• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于不完全属性的损失厌恶 3PL 的激励反向拍卖的机制设计。

Mechanism design of incentive-based reverse auctions with loss-averse 3PLs under incomplete attributes.

机构信息

College of Management, Research Institute of Business Analytics & Supply Chain Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207937. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0207937
PMID:30485358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6261608/
Abstract

As a supply chain solution integrator, fourth party logistics (4PL) has become an important focus for improving the operational efficiency of the logistics industry in recent days. This paper addresses the mechanism design problem of the 4PL for selecting a third party logistics (3PL) provider who involves loss-averse behavior to form a longer-term strategic partnership in multi-attribute reverse auctions. Due to fluctuating costs of energy or labor and unintentional delivery failures like traffic jam or technology malfunctions, we consider two incomplete attributes, namely cost uncertainty and delivery risk. Integrating the loss-averse behavior of 3PLs, based on the prospect theory, the bid decision model is constructed to obtain 3PLs' bidding strategies. The corresponding efficient and optimal scoring auctions that consist of cost-sharing contract and contingent penalty are developed to maximize the ex ante expected profit of the system or the 4PL depending on whether the 4PL is willing to cooperate or not. Theoretical analysis verified by numerical examples illustrates the advantage of the proposed mechanisms. Impacts of model parameters on the 4PL's decision are also investigated and managerial insights are presented.

摘要

作为供应链解决方案集成商,第四方物流(4PL)已成为提高物流行业运营效率的重要关注点。本文针对涉及损失厌恶行为的第三方物流(3PL)供应商选择问题,研究了在多属性逆向拍卖中 4PL 的机制设计问题,以形成更长期的战略合作伙伴关系。由于能源或劳动力成本波动以及交通堵塞或技术故障等非故意交付失败等原因,我们考虑了两个不完整的属性,即成本不确定性和交付风险。结合 3PL 的损失厌恶行为,基于前景理论构建了投标决策模型,以获取 3PL 的投标策略。开发了包含成本分担合同和应急罚款的有效和最优评分拍卖,以最大化系统或 4PL 的预期利润,具体取决于 4PL 是否愿意合作。通过数值示例进行的理论分析验证了所提出机制的优势。还研究了模型参数对 4PL 决策的影响,并提出了管理见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c17/6261608/312a49adfb6f/pone.0207937.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c17/6261608/563adb5bfefc/pone.0207937.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c17/6261608/1811e8db9424/pone.0207937.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c17/6261608/f0d02557fe53/pone.0207937.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c17/6261608/312a49adfb6f/pone.0207937.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c17/6261608/563adb5bfefc/pone.0207937.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c17/6261608/1811e8db9424/pone.0207937.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c17/6261608/f0d02557fe53/pone.0207937.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c17/6261608/312a49adfb6f/pone.0207937.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanism design of incentive-based reverse auctions with loss-averse 3PLs under incomplete attributes.基于不完全属性的损失厌恶 3PL 的激励反向拍卖的机制设计。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207937. eCollection 2018.
2
Cooperation and coopetition among retailers-third party logistics providers alliances under different risk behaviors, uncertainty demand and environmental considerations.不同风险行为、需求不确定性和环境因素下零售商与第三方物流提供商联盟之间的合作与竞合关系
Environ Dev Sustain. 2023;25(6):5597-5633. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02282-x. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
3
Is environmental sustainability a strategic priority for logistics service providers?环境可持续性是物流服务提供商的战略重点吗?
J Environ Manage. 2017 Aug 1;198(Pt 1):353-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.096. Epub 2017 May 8.
4
Advantages of 3PLs as healthcare supply chain orchestrators.第三方物流作为医疗供应链协调者的优势。
Comput Ind Eng. 2021 Nov;161:107628. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107628. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
Green winner determination method based on environmental performance and minimum adjustment consensus in 4PL transportation service procurement.基于环境绩效和最小调整共识的 4PL 运输服务采购绿色赢家确定方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(12):34518-34535. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24364-z. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
Smarter than others? Conjectures in lowest unique bid auctions.比别人更聪明?关于次低价位拍卖的猜想。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0122923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122923. eCollection 2015.
7
Grey-Theory-Based Optimization Model of Emergency Logistics Considering Time Uncertainty.基于灰色理论的考虑时间不确定性的应急物流优化模型
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 29;10(9):e0139132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139132. eCollection 2015.
8
Coordinating a supply chain with a loss-averse retailer and effort dependent demand.协调一个包含厌恶损失零售商和努力依赖需求的供应链。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:231041. doi: 10.1155/2014/231041. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
9
Biased Random-Key Genetic Algorithms for the Winner Determination Problem in Combinatorial Auctions.组合拍卖中赢家确定问题的有偏随机键遗传算法。
Evol Comput. 2015 Summer;23(2):279-307. doi: 10.1162/EVCO_a_00138. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
10
Study on Benefit Coordination of Supply Chain Network Based on Green Development.基于绿色发展的供应链网络效益协调研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 24;16(8):1458. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081458.

引用本文的文献

1
A sampling-based winner determination model and algorithm for logistics service procurement auctions under double uncertainty.双重不确定性下基于抽样的物流服务采购拍卖中标者确定模型与算法
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 8;15(1):12054. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94748-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Grey-Theory-Based Optimization Model of Emergency Logistics Considering Time Uncertainty.基于灰色理论的考虑时间不确定性的应急物流优化模型
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 29;10(9):e0139132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139132. eCollection 2015.