Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Diabet Med. 2019 Apr;36(4):473-481. doi: 10.1111/dme.13871. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
AIMS: To compare the outcomes of partners who participated in a telephone couples behavioural intervention to improve glycaemic control in persons with Type 2 diabetes with those of untreated partners of participants in an individual intervention or education; to explore 'ripple effects', i.e. positive behaviour changes seen in untreated partners. METHODS: The Diabetes Support Project was a three-arm randomized telephone intervention trial comparing outcomes of couples calls (CC), individual calls (IC) and diabetes education calls (DE). Couples included one partner with Type 2 diabetes and HbA ≥ 58 mmol/mol (7.5%). All arms received self-management education (two calls). CC and IC arms participated in 10 additional behaviour change calls. CC included partners, emphasizing partner communication, collaboration and support. Blinded assessments were performed at 4, 8 and 12 months. Partner outcomes were psychosocial (diabetes distress, relationship satisfaction, depressive symptoms), medical (BMI, blood pressure) and behavioural (fat intake, activity). RESULTS: Partners' (N = 268) mean age was 55.8 years, 64.6% were female and 29.9% were from minority ethnic groups. CC (vs. IC and DE) partners had greater reductions in diabetes distress, greater increases in marital satisfaction (4 and 8 months), and some improvements in diastolic BP. There were no consistent differences among arms in other outcomes. There was no evidence of a dietary or activity behaviour ripple effect on untreated partners, i.e. comparing partners in the IC and DE arms. CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative couples intervention resulted in significant improvements in partner diabetes distress and relationship satisfaction. There were no consistent effects on behavioural or medical partner outcomes, and no evidence of diet or activity behaviour ripple effects, suggesting that partners should be targeted directly to achieve these changes. (Clinical Trial Registry No: NCT01017523).
目的:比较参与电话伴侣行为干预以改善 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的伴侣与接受个体干预或教育的参与者未治疗伴侣的结局;探索“涟漪效应”,即未治疗伴侣中观察到的积极行为变化。
方法:糖尿病支持项目是一项三臂随机电话干预试验,比较了伴侣电话(CC)、个体电话(IC)和糖尿病教育电话(DE)的结局。夫妇中包括一名 2 型糖尿病伴 HbA≥58mmol/mol(7.5%)的患者。所有组均接受自我管理教育(2 次电话)。CC 和 IC 组参加了另外 10 次行为改变电话。CC 包括伴侣,强调伴侣沟通、协作和支持。在 4、8 和 12 个月时进行盲法评估。伴侣结局为心理社会(糖尿病困扰、关系满意度、抑郁症状)、医学(BMI、血压)和行为(脂肪摄入、活动)。
结果:伴侣(N=268)的平均年龄为 55.8 岁,64.6%为女性,29.9%来自少数民族群体。与 IC 和 DE 相比,CC(与 IC 和 DE)的伴侣的糖尿病困扰程度降低更大,婚姻满意度增加更大(4 和 8 个月),舒张压也有所改善。各组在其他结局上没有一致的差异。IC 和 DE 组的未治疗伴侣中没有饮食或活动行为涟漪效应的证据。
结论:协作式伴侣干预可显著改善伴侣的糖尿病困扰和关系满意度。对行为或医学伴侣结局没有一致的影响,也没有饮食或活动行为涟漪效应的证据,这表明应该直接针对伴侣来实现这些变化。(临床试验注册号:NCT01017523)。
Fam Syst Health. 2011-9
Br J Health Psychol. 2018-3-8
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2025-7-21
Healthcare (Basel). 2025-6-11
Diabetes Spectr. 2023
Fam Syst Health. 2017-12
N Engl J Med. 2016-5-12
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015-7-29
Fam Syst Health. 2011-9
Am J Manag Care. 2011-2