文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

两人同行,优惠加倍?夫妻干预对 2 型糖尿病患者伴侣的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Two for one? Effects of a couples intervention on partners of persons with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2019 Apr;36(4):473-481. doi: 10.1111/dme.13871. Epub 2019 Jan 8.


DOI:10.1111/dme.13871
PMID:30485516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6408270/
Abstract

AIMS: To compare the outcomes of partners who participated in a telephone couples behavioural intervention to improve glycaemic control in persons with Type 2 diabetes with those of untreated partners of participants in an individual intervention or education; to explore 'ripple effects', i.e. positive behaviour changes seen in untreated partners. METHODS: The Diabetes Support Project was a three-arm randomized telephone intervention trial comparing outcomes of couples calls (CC), individual calls (IC) and diabetes education calls (DE). Couples included one partner with Type 2 diabetes and HbA ≥ 58 mmol/mol (7.5%). All arms received self-management education (two calls). CC and IC arms participated in 10 additional behaviour change calls. CC included partners, emphasizing partner communication, collaboration and support. Blinded assessments were performed at 4, 8 and 12 months. Partner outcomes were psychosocial (diabetes distress, relationship satisfaction, depressive symptoms), medical (BMI, blood pressure) and behavioural (fat intake, activity). RESULTS: Partners' (N = 268) mean age was 55.8 years, 64.6% were female and 29.9% were from minority ethnic groups. CC (vs. IC and DE) partners had greater reductions in diabetes distress, greater increases in marital satisfaction (4 and 8 months), and some improvements in diastolic BP. There were no consistent differences among arms in other outcomes. There was no evidence of a dietary or activity behaviour ripple effect on untreated partners, i.e. comparing partners in the IC and DE arms. CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative couples intervention resulted in significant improvements in partner diabetes distress and relationship satisfaction. There were no consistent effects on behavioural or medical partner outcomes, and no evidence of diet or activity behaviour ripple effects, suggesting that partners should be targeted directly to achieve these changes. (Clinical Trial Registry No: NCT01017523).

摘要

目的:比较参与电话伴侣行为干预以改善 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的伴侣与接受个体干预或教育的参与者未治疗伴侣的结局;探索“涟漪效应”,即未治疗伴侣中观察到的积极行为变化。

方法:糖尿病支持项目是一项三臂随机电话干预试验,比较了伴侣电话(CC)、个体电话(IC)和糖尿病教育电话(DE)的结局。夫妇中包括一名 2 型糖尿病伴 HbA≥58mmol/mol(7.5%)的患者。所有组均接受自我管理教育(2 次电话)。CC 和 IC 组参加了另外 10 次行为改变电话。CC 包括伴侣,强调伴侣沟通、协作和支持。在 4、8 和 12 个月时进行盲法评估。伴侣结局为心理社会(糖尿病困扰、关系满意度、抑郁症状)、医学(BMI、血压)和行为(脂肪摄入、活动)。

结果:伴侣(N=268)的平均年龄为 55.8 岁,64.6%为女性,29.9%来自少数民族群体。与 IC 和 DE 相比,CC(与 IC 和 DE)的伴侣的糖尿病困扰程度降低更大,婚姻满意度增加更大(4 和 8 个月),舒张压也有所改善。各组在其他结局上没有一致的差异。IC 和 DE 组的未治疗伴侣中没有饮食或活动行为涟漪效应的证据。

结论:协作式伴侣干预可显著改善伴侣的糖尿病困扰和关系满意度。对行为或医学伴侣结局没有一致的影响,也没有饮食或活动行为涟漪效应的证据,这表明应该直接针对伴侣来实现这些变化。(临床试验注册号:NCT01017523)。

相似文献

[1]
Two for one? Effects of a couples intervention on partners of persons with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

Diabet Med. 2019-1-8

[2]
Health and Psychosocial Outcomes of a Telephonic Couples Behavior Change Intervention in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Diabetes Care. 2016-12

[3]
Promoting couples collaboration in type 2 diabetes: the diabetes support project pilot data.

Fam Syst Health. 2011-9

[4]
A Couples-Based Approach for Increasing Physical Activity Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Diabetes Educ. 2019-10-16

[5]
Outcomes of New York City Care Calls: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial of Telephone-Delivered Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Support.

Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2024-6

[6]
Inter-relations among negative social control, self-efficacy, and physical activity in healthy couples.

Br J Health Psychol. 2018-3-8

[7]

2017-7

[8]
Does Length of Relationship or Gender Predict Response to Behavioral Diabetes Intervention?

Diabetes Educ. 2017-4

[9]
A randomized clinical trial of a psychoeducational intervention to improve outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Arthritis Rheum. 2004-6

[10]

2018-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Using places of worship to recruit and retain couples for the 'Diabetes Together' intervention.

Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2025-7-21

[2]
Multilevel Interventions Demonstrate Mixed Effectiveness for Improving Blood Pressure Outcomes: A Rapid Review.

Healthcare (Basel). 2025-6-11

[3]
A Couple-Based Intervention for Chinese Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Netw Open. 2025-1-2

[4]
Examining Share plus-A Continuous Glucose Monitoring Plus Data-Sharing Intervention in Older Adults and Their Care Partners: Protocol for a Randomized Control Study.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024-12-16

[5]
The effectiveness of couples' lifestyle interventions on weight change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Nutr Health. 2025-3

[6]
Outcomes from Partner2Lose: a randomized controlled trial to evaluate 24-month weight loss in a partner-assisted intervention.

BMC Public Health. 2024-7-20

[7]
Practicing Interoceptive Sensitivity as a Couple: A Mixed-Methods Acceptance Analysis of a Dyadic vs. Single Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nutrients. 2024-6-19

[8]
Spousal Involvement in Collaborative Management and Glycemic Behavior Change among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

SAGE Open Nurs. 2024-4-18

[9]
Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Data Sharing to Encourage Collaboration Among Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Care Partners: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

JMIR Nurs. 2023-7-26

[10]
Cognitive Abilities and Collaboration in Couples in Type 1 Diabetes Management.

Diabetes Spectr. 2023

本文引用的文献

[1]
"Miscarried helping" in adults with Type 2 diabetes: Helping for Health Inventory-Couples.

Fam Syst Health. 2017-12

[2]
Health and Psychosocial Outcomes of a Telephonic Couples Behavior Change Intervention in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Diabetes Care. 2016-12

[3]
Health as a Family Affair.

N Engl J Med. 2016-5-12

[4]
Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis.

Clin Psychol Rev. 2015-7-29

[5]
When does Spousal Social Control Provoke Negative Reactions in the Context of Chronic Illness?: The Pivotal Role of Patients' Expectations.

J Soc Pers Relat. 2011-9

[6]
Examining a ripple effect: do spouses' behavior changes predict each other's weight loss?

J Obes. 2013

[7]
Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): cross-national benchmarking indicators for family members living with people with diabetes.

Diabet Med. 2013-7

[8]
Interrelation between adult persons with diabetes and their family: a systematic review of the literature.

J Fam Nurs. 2013-1-3

[9]
Promoting couples collaboration in type 2 diabetes: the diabetes support project pilot data.

Fam Syst Health. 2011-9

[10]
Psychological family intervention for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Am J Manag Care. 2011-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索