Suppr超能文献

两人同行,优惠加倍?夫妻干预对 2 型糖尿病患者伴侣的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Two for one? Effects of a couples intervention on partners of persons with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2019 Apr;36(4):473-481. doi: 10.1111/dme.13871. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare the outcomes of partners who participated in a telephone couples behavioural intervention to improve glycaemic control in persons with Type 2 diabetes with those of untreated partners of participants in an individual intervention or education; to explore 'ripple effects', i.e. positive behaviour changes seen in untreated partners.

METHODS

The Diabetes Support Project was a three-arm randomized telephone intervention trial comparing outcomes of couples calls (CC), individual calls (IC) and diabetes education calls (DE). Couples included one partner with Type 2 diabetes and HbA ≥ 58 mmol/mol (7.5%). All arms received self-management education (two calls). CC and IC arms participated in 10 additional behaviour change calls. CC included partners, emphasizing partner communication, collaboration and support. Blinded assessments were performed at 4, 8 and 12 months. Partner outcomes were psychosocial (diabetes distress, relationship satisfaction, depressive symptoms), medical (BMI, blood pressure) and behavioural (fat intake, activity).

RESULTS

Partners' (N = 268) mean age was 55.8 years, 64.6% were female and 29.9% were from minority ethnic groups. CC (vs. IC and DE) partners had greater reductions in diabetes distress, greater increases in marital satisfaction (4 and 8 months), and some improvements in diastolic BP. There were no consistent differences among arms in other outcomes. There was no evidence of a dietary or activity behaviour ripple effect on untreated partners, i.e. comparing partners in the IC and DE arms.

CONCLUSIONS

A collaborative couples intervention resulted in significant improvements in partner diabetes distress and relationship satisfaction. There were no consistent effects on behavioural or medical partner outcomes, and no evidence of diet or activity behaviour ripple effects, suggesting that partners should be targeted directly to achieve these changes. (Clinical Trial Registry No: NCT01017523).

摘要

目的

比较参与电话伴侣行为干预以改善 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的伴侣与接受个体干预或教育的参与者未治疗伴侣的结局;探索“涟漪效应”,即未治疗伴侣中观察到的积极行为变化。

方法

糖尿病支持项目是一项三臂随机电话干预试验,比较了伴侣电话(CC)、个体电话(IC)和糖尿病教育电话(DE)的结局。夫妇中包括一名 2 型糖尿病伴 HbA≥58mmol/mol(7.5%)的患者。所有组均接受自我管理教育(2 次电话)。CC 和 IC 组参加了另外 10 次行为改变电话。CC 包括伴侣,强调伴侣沟通、协作和支持。在 4、8 和 12 个月时进行盲法评估。伴侣结局为心理社会(糖尿病困扰、关系满意度、抑郁症状)、医学(BMI、血压)和行为(脂肪摄入、活动)。

结果

伴侣(N=268)的平均年龄为 55.8 岁,64.6%为女性,29.9%来自少数民族群体。与 IC 和 DE 相比,CC(与 IC 和 DE)的伴侣的糖尿病困扰程度降低更大,婚姻满意度增加更大(4 和 8 个月),舒张压也有所改善。各组在其他结局上没有一致的差异。IC 和 DE 组的未治疗伴侣中没有饮食或活动行为涟漪效应的证据。

结论

协作式伴侣干预可显著改善伴侣的糖尿病困扰和关系满意度。对行为或医学伴侣结局没有一致的影响,也没有饮食或活动行为涟漪效应的证据,这表明应该直接针对伴侣来实现这些变化。(临床试验注册号:NCT01017523)。

相似文献

3
Promoting couples collaboration in type 2 diabetes: the diabetes support project pilot data.
Fam Syst Health. 2011 Sep;29(3):253-61. doi: 10.1037/a0024564.
6
Inter-relations among negative social control, self-efficacy, and physical activity in healthy couples.
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Sep;23(3):580-596. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12305. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
7
8
Does Length of Relationship or Gender Predict Response to Behavioral Diabetes Intervention?
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Apr;43(2):216-222. doi: 10.1177/0145721717691147. Epub 2017 Feb 5.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Using places of worship to recruit and retain couples for the 'Diabetes Together' intervention.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2025 Jul 21;17(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4947.
2
Multilevel Interventions Demonstrate Mixed Effectiveness for Improving Blood Pressure Outcomes: A Rapid Review.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;13(12):1397. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121397.
3
A Couple-Based Intervention for Chinese Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2452168. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52168.
8
Spousal Involvement in Collaborative Management and Glycemic Behavior Change among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Apr 18;10:23779608241245196. doi: 10.1177/23779608241245196. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
Cognitive Abilities and Collaboration in Couples in Type 1 Diabetes Management.
Diabetes Spectr. 2023 Winter;36(1):33-40. doi: 10.2337/ds21-0057. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
"Miscarried helping" in adults with Type 2 diabetes: Helping for Health Inventory-Couples.
Fam Syst Health. 2017 Dec;35(4):409-419. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000289.
3
Health as a Family Affair.
N Engl J Med. 2016 May 12;374(19):1804-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1604456.
4
Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:28-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
6
Examining a ripple effect: do spouses' behavior changes predict each other's weight loss?
J Obes. 2013;2013:297268. doi: 10.1155/2013/297268. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
8
Interrelation between adult persons with diabetes and their family: a systematic review of the literature.
J Fam Nurs. 2013 Feb;19(1):3-28. doi: 10.1177/1074840712471899. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
9
Promoting couples collaboration in type 2 diabetes: the diabetes support project pilot data.
Fam Syst Health. 2011 Sep;29(3):253-61. doi: 10.1037/a0024564.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验