• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"Miscarried helping" in adults with Type 2 diabetes: Helping for Health Inventory-Couples.2型糖尿病成人中的“错误帮助”:健康帮助量表-夫妻版
Fam Syst Health. 2017 Dec;35(4):409-419. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000289.
2
The Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication questionnaire: an instrument to measure affect specific to blood glucose monitoring.血糖监测交流问卷:一种测量特定于血糖监测的情感的工具。
Diabetes Care. 2004 Nov;27(11):2610-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.11.2610.
3
Internal structure and psychometric properties of Diabetes Distress Scale for Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病患者糖尿病痛苦量表的内部结构及心理测量学特性
Psychiatriki. 2020 Oct-Dec;31(4):302-309. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2020.314.302.
4
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
5
Optimizing Diabetes Self-management Using the Novel Skills, Confidence, and Preparedness Index (SCPI).利用新型技能、信心和准备指数(SCPI)优化糖尿病自我管理。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Oct;42(10):1873-1878. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0699. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
6
Assessing Diabetes Distress in Emerging Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Development and Validation of the Problem Areas in Diabetes-Emerging Adult Version.评估初发 1 型糖尿病成年患者的糖尿病困扰:糖尿病-成年初发患者版问题领域的制定与验证。
Can J Diabetes. 2022 Jul;46(5):503-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
7
Assessing helpful and harmful family and friend involvement in adults' type 2 diabetes self-management.评估家庭和朋友对成年人 2 型糖尿病自我管理的有益和有害影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jul;102(7):1380-1388. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.027. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
8
Validity and reliability of an adolescent and parent rating scale of type 1 diabetes adherence behaviors: the Self-Care Inventory (SCI).1型糖尿病依从行为青少年及家长评定量表的效度与信度:自我护理量表(SCI)
J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Oct;34(9):999-1007. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp032. Epub 2009 May 7.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R)--a measure of symptom distress.糖尿病症状清单修订版(DSC-R)的心理计量学评估——一种症状困扰的测量工具。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1168-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00571.x. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
10
Serial mediation roles of empowerment and self-care activities connecting health literacy, quality of life, and glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes.授权和自我保健活动在连接 2 型糖尿病患者的健康素养、生活质量和血糖控制方面的连续中介作用。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024 Jun;21(3):330-337. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12684. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.糖尿病家族评估工具:测量属性的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;20(2):1325. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021325.
2
How to identify clinically significant diabetes distress using the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale in adults with diabetes treated in primary or secondary care? Evidence for new cut points based on latent class analyses.如何使用初级或二级保健治疗的糖尿病患者的糖尿病困扰问题量表(PAID)识别临床显著的糖尿病困扰?基于潜在类别分析的新切点证据。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 11;12(3):e056304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056304.
3
Assessing helpful and harmful family and friend involvement in adults' type 2 diabetes self-management.评估家庭和朋友对成年人 2 型糖尿病自我管理的有益和有害影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jul;102(7):1380-1388. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.027. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Two for one? Effects of a couples intervention on partners of persons with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.两人同行,优惠加倍?夫妻干预对 2 型糖尿病患者伴侣的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Diabet Med. 2019 Apr;36(4):473-481. doi: 10.1111/dme.13871. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Health and Psychosocial Outcomes of a Telephonic Couples Behavior Change Intervention in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的电话夫妻行为改变干预的健康和心理社会结局:一项随机临床试验。
Diabetes Care. 2016 Dec;39(12):2165-2173. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0035. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
2
Adults with type 1 diabetes: Partner relationships and outcomes.1型糖尿病成人患者:伴侣关系与结局。
J Health Psychol. 2017 Mar;22(4):446-456. doi: 10.1177/1359105315605654. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
3
When helping hurts: miscarried helping in families of youth with chronic pain.当帮助造成伤害时:对患有慢性疼痛的青少年家庭的不当帮助
J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 May;39(4):427-37. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu003. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
4
When does Spousal Social Control Provoke Negative Reactions in the Context of Chronic Illness?: The Pivotal Role of Patients' Expectations.在慢性病背景下,配偶的社会控制何时会引发负面反应?患者期望的关键作用。
J Soc Pers Relat. 2011 Sep;28(6). doi: 10.1177/0265407510391335.
5
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012.2012 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1033-46. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2625. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
6
Challenges and Lessons Learned in the Development and Implementation of a Couples-Focused Telephone Intervention for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: The Diabetes Support Project.2型糖尿病成人伴侣聚焦电话干预措施开发与实施中的挑战及经验教训:糖尿病支持项目
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Sep 1;1(3):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0057-8.
7
Support behavior and relationship satisfaction in couples dealing with diabetes: main and moderating effects.支持患有糖尿病的夫妇的行为和关系满意度:主要和调节作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):578-86. doi: 10.1037/a0021009.
8
The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population.PHQ-8作为一般人群当前抑郁状况的一种测量工具。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
9
Relationship satisfaction in women: a longitudinal case-control study about the role of breast cancer, personal assertiveness, and partners' relationship-focused coping.女性的关系满意度:一项关于乳腺癌、个人自信以及伴侣以关系为中心应对方式作用的纵向病例对照研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Nov;13(Pt 4):737-54. doi: 10.1348/135910707X252431. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
10
Improving self-management in insulin-treated adults participating in diabetes education. The role of overprotection by the partner.改善参与糖尿病教育的胰岛素治疗成年患者的自我管理。伴侣过度保护的作用。
Diabet Med. 2006 Mar;23(3):271-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01794.x.

2型糖尿病成人中的“错误帮助”:健康帮助量表-夫妻版

"Miscarried helping" in adults with Type 2 diabetes: Helping for Health Inventory-Couples.

作者信息

Tanaka Rika, Trief Paula M, Scales Kasandra, Weinstock Ruth S

机构信息

Behavioural Cardiology Research Unit, Toronto General Hospital.

Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Upstate Medical University.

出版信息

Fam Syst Health. 2017 Dec;35(4):409-419. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000289.

DOI:10.1037/fsh0000289
PMID:29283609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5751933/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Family-partner support has been associated with better blood glucose control, self-care adherence, and quality of life in adult patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D). "Miscarried helping" has described interactions between youth with chronic diseases and their family members, in which a family member is helpful, but efforts are perceived as negative by the patient. Miscarried helping has not, however, been measured in adults with diabetes, which was the purpose of our study.

METHOD

Data from a randomized clinical trial (n = 268) were analyzed to establish the psychometric properties and correlates of an adaptation of a measure of miscarried helping developed in pediatric populations, for use with adults with T2D.

RESULTS

The Helping for Health Inventory-Couples Version (HHI-C) was found to have three underlying factors and demonstrated adequate internal consistency across time (α at baseline = .86, 4 months = .87, 8 months = .86, and 12 months = .83) and showed high test-retest reliability (p < .01) over a 12-month period. Convergent validity was partially supported, because baseline HHI-C was positively associated with maladaptive conflict resolution strategies (p = .03) and negatively associated with adaptive conflict resolution strategies (p = .04) and diabetes knowledge (p < .01). The HHI-C did not correlate with body mass index or hemoglobin A1c, a measure of glycemic control. The HHI-C was positively associated with diabetes distress (p < .01) and depressive symptoms (p = .01).

DISCUSSION

This study is the 1st known reporting of the psychometric properties of a measure of miscarried helping for adults with T2D. This valid measure of miscarried helping could be useful in future studies evaluating novel, relationship-based approaches to assist adults with T2D in disease management. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

目的

家庭伴侣支持与成年2型糖尿病(T2D)患者更好的血糖控制、自我护理依从性及生活质量相关。“流产式帮助”描述了患有慢性病的青少年与其家庭成员之间的互动,即家庭成员虽提供了帮助,但患者却将这些努力视为负面的。然而,尚未对成年糖尿病患者的流产式帮助进行测量,这正是我们这项研究的目的。

方法

对一项随机临床试验(n = 268)的数据进行分析,以确定一种适用于儿科人群的流产式帮助测量方法改编版的心理测量特性及其相关因素,该改编版用于成年T2D患者。

结果

健康帮助量表-伴侣版(HHI-C)被发现有三个潜在因素,且在不同时间点均表现出足够的内部一致性(基线时α = 0.86,4个月时 = 0.87,8个月时 = 0.86,12个月时 = 0.83),并在12个月期间显示出较高的重测信度(p < 0.01)。收敛效度得到部分支持,因为基线HHI-C与适应不良的冲突解决策略呈正相关(p = 0.03),与适应性冲突解决策略呈负相关(p = 0.04),与糖尿病知识呈负相关(p < 0.01)。HHI-C与体重指数或糖化血红蛋白(一种血糖控制指标)无关。HHI-C与糖尿病困扰呈正相关(p < 0.01),与抑郁症状呈正相关(p = 0.01)。

讨论

本研究是首次报道针对成年T2D患者的流产式帮助测量方法的心理测量特性。这种有效的流产式帮助测量方法可能有助于未来评估基于关系的新方法以协助成年T2D患者进行疾病管理的研究。(PsycINFO数据库记录