1 Center for Food Safety, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, Georgia 30223-1797.
2 Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, 2360 Rainwater Road, Tifton, Georgia 31793-5766, USA.
J Food Prot. 2018 Dec;81(12):2074-2081. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-344.
Cucumbers are frequently consumed raw and have been implicated in several recent foodborne outbreaks. Because this item may become contaminated at the farm, it is vital to explore the fate of attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium or Escherichia coli O157:H7 sprayed onto foliage, flowers, and fruit in fields and determine whether pre- or postcontamination spray interventions could minimize contamination. After spraying cucumber plants with contaminated irrigation water (3.8 log CFU/mL of Salmonella Typhimurium and E. coli O157:H7), 60 to 78% of cucumber fruit were not contaminated because the plant's canopy likely prevented many of the underlying fruit from being exposed to the water. Subsequent exposure of contaminated cucumber plants to a simulated shower event did not appear to dislodge pathogens from contaminated foliage onto the fruit, nor did it appear to consistently wash either pathogen from the fruit. Spraying flowers and attached ovaries directly with a pathogen inoculum (4.6 log CFU/mL) initially led to 100% and 65 to 90% contamination, respectively. Within 3 days, 30 to 40% of the flowers were still contaminated; however, contamination of ovaries was minimal (≤10%), suggesting it was unlikely that internalization occurred through the flower to the ovary with these pathogen strains. In another study, both pathogens were found on a withered flower but not on the fruit to which the flower was attached, suggesting that this contaminated flower could serve as a source of cross-contamination in a storage bin if harvested with the fruit. Because pre- and postcontamination acetic acid-based spray treatments failed to reduce pathogen prevalence, the probability that fruit initially contaminated at 1.3 to 2.8 log CFU of Salmonella Typhimurium or E. coli O157:H7 per cucumber would be positive by enrichment culture decreased by a factor of 1.6 and 1.9 for Salmonella Typhimurium and E. coli O157:H7, respectively, for every day the fruit was held in the field ( P ≤ 0.0001). Hence, to reduce the prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium on cucumbers below 5%, more than 1 week would be required.
黄瓜经常被生吃,并且已经牵连到几起近期的食源性疾病爆发事件中。因为该物品在农场时可能受到污染,所以探索减毒鼠伤寒沙门氏菌或大肠杆菌 O157:H7 被喷洒到田间的枝叶、花朵和果实上的命运至关重要,并确定预污染或后污染喷雾干预是否可以最小化污染。用受污染的灌溉水(鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌 O157:H7 的 3.8 对数 CFU/mL)喷洒黄瓜植株后,有 60%到 78%的黄瓜果实没有被污染,因为植物冠层可能阻止了许多果实暴露在水中。随后,受污染的黄瓜植株受到模拟喷淋事件的暴露,似乎并没有将病原体从污染的枝叶转移到果实上,也没有将这两种病原体从果实上冲洗掉。直接将病原体接种物(4.6 对数 CFU/mL)喷洒到花朵和附着的子房上,最初分别导致 100%和 65%到 90%的污染。在 3 天内,仍有 30%到 40%的花朵受到污染;然而,子房的污染程度很低(≤10%),这表明在这些病原体菌株中,内部化不太可能通过花朵进入子房。在另一项研究中,两种病原体都存在于一朵枯萎的花朵上,但不存在于与花朵相连的果实上,这表明如果与果实一起收获,这种受污染的花朵可能成为储存箱中交叉污染的来源。因为预污染和后污染的基于醋酸的喷雾处理未能降低病原体的流行率,所以受污染的水果在田间放置的时间每增加一天,最初受污染的鼠伤寒沙门氏菌或大肠杆菌 O157:H7 数量为每根黄瓜 1.3 到 2.8 对数 CFU,通过富集培养呈阳性的可能性就会分别降低 1.6 和 1.9 倍(P≤0.0001)。因此,要将鼠伤寒沙门氏菌在黄瓜上的流行率降低到 5%以下,需要超过 1 周的时间。