Cranfield University, Martell House, Cranfield, Bedford, MK43 0TR, United Kingdom.
Cranfield University, Martell House, Cranfield, Bedford, MK43 0TR, United Kingdom.
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jan;74:221-232. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.028. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
Technological advances have led to physiological measurement being increasingly used to measure and predict operator states. Mental workload (MWL) in particular has been characterised using a variety of physiological sensor data. This systematic review contributes a synthesis of the literature summarising key findings to assist practitioners to select measures for use in evaluation of MWL. We also describe limitations of the methods to assist selection when being deployed in applied or laboratory settings. We detail fifty-eight peer reviewed journal articles which present original data using physiological measures to include electrocardiographic, respiratory, dermal, blood pressure and ocular. Electroencephalographic measures have been included if they are presented with another measure to constrain scope. The literature reviewed covers a range of applied and experimental studies across various domains, safety-critical applications being highly represented in the sample of applied literature reviewed. We present a summary of the six measures and provide an evidence base which includes how to deploy each measure, and characteristics that can affect or preclude the use of a measure in research. Measures can be used to discriminate differences in MWL caused by task type, task load, and in some cases task difficulty. Varying ranges of sensitivity to sudden or gradual changes in taskload are also evident across the six measures. We conclude that there is no single measure that clearly discriminates mental workload but there is a growing empirical basis with which to inform both science and practice.
技术进步使得生理测量越来越多地被用于测量和预测操作人员的状态。特别是,已经使用各种生理传感器数据来描述脑力工作负荷(MWL)。本系统评价综合了文献,总结了关键发现,以帮助从业人员选择用于评估 MWL 的测量方法。我们还描述了在应用或实验室环境中部署时选择方法的局限性。我们详细介绍了 58 篇经过同行评审的期刊文章,这些文章使用生理测量方法提供了原始数据,包括心电图、呼吸、皮肤、血压和眼部。如果脑电图测量与其他测量方法一起呈现以限制范围,则包括脑电图测量方法。综述的文献涵盖了各种应用和实验研究,涉及多个领域,安全关键应用在应用文献综述样本中占很大比例。我们总结了这六种测量方法,并提供了一个证据基础,其中包括如何部署每种测量方法,以及可能影响或排除在研究中使用测量方法的特征。这些测量方法可以用于区分任务类型、任务负荷和在某些情况下任务难度引起的 MWL 差异。六种测量方法在对任务负荷的突然或逐渐变化的敏感性方面也存在不同的范围。我们的结论是,没有一种单一的测量方法可以清楚地区分脑力工作负荷,但有越来越多的经验基础可以为科学和实践提供信息。