• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种包含不适用字符的离散字符矩阵的相似性度量新家族及其在歧异研究中的重要性。

A new family of dissimilarity metrics for discrete character matrices that include inapplicable characters and its importance for disparity studies.

机构信息

Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA

Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Nov 28;285(1892):20181784. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1784.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2018.1784
PMID:30487309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6283942/
Abstract

The use of discrete character data for disparity analyses has become more popular, partially due to the recognition that character data describe variation at large taxonomic scales, as well as the increasing availability of both character matrices co-opted from phylogenetic analysis and software tools. As taxonomic scope increases, the need to describe variation leads to some characters that may describe traits not found across all the taxa. In such situations, it is common practice to treat inapplicable characters as missing data when calculating dissimilarity matrices for disparity studies. For commonly used dissimilarity metrics like Wills's GED and Gower's coefficient, this can lead to the reranking of pairwise dissimilarities, resulting in taxa that share more primary character states being assigned larger dissimilarity values than taxa that share fewer. We introduce a family of metrics that proportionally weight primary characters according to the secondary characters that describe them, effectively eliminating this problem, and compare their performance to common dissimilarity metrics and previously proposed weighting schemes. When applied to empirical datasets, we confirm that choice of dissimilarity metric frequently affects the rank order of pairwise distances, differentially influencing downstream macroevolutionary inferences.

摘要

离散字符数据在视差分析中的应用变得越来越流行,部分原因是人们认识到字符数据可以描述较大的分类尺度上的变异,而且字符矩阵越来越多地来自系统发育分析和软件工具。随着分类范围的扩大,描述变异的需要导致一些字符可能描述了所有类群中都没有的特征。在这种情况下,当为视差研究计算不相似性矩阵时,通常将不可应用的字符视为缺失数据。对于常用的不相似性度量,如威尔斯的 GED 和高尔系数,这可能导致成对不相似性的重新排序,导致共享更多主要特征状态的分类单元被分配更大的不相似性值,而共享较少主要特征状态的分类单元则被分配更小的不相似性值。我们引入了一组度量标准,根据描述它们的次要特征对主要特征进行比例加权,有效地解决了这个问题,并将其性能与常用的不相似性度量标准和先前提出的加权方案进行了比较。当应用于经验数据集时,我们证实不相似性度量标准的选择经常影响成对距离的排序,从而对下游的宏观进化推断产生不同的影响。

相似文献

1
A new family of dissimilarity metrics for discrete character matrices that include inapplicable characters and its importance for disparity studies.一种包含不适用字符的离散字符矩阵的相似性度量新家族及其在歧异研究中的重要性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Nov 28;285(1892):20181784. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1784.
2
Incorporating Hierarchical Characters into Phylogenetic Analysis.将层次字符纳入系统发育分析。
Syst Biol. 2021 Oct 13;70(6):1163-1180. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syab005.
3
Joined at the hip: linked characters and the problem of missing data in studies of disparity.紧密相连:关联特征与差异研究中的数据缺失问题
Evolution. 2014 Aug;68(8):2386-400. doi: 10.1111/evo.12435. Epub 2014 May 22.
4
Increasing the number of discrete character states for continuous characters generates well-resolved trees that do not reflect phylogeny.增加连续性状的离散性状状态数量会生成不能反映系统发育的分辨率良好的树。
Integr Zool. 2014 Aug;9(4):531-41. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12076.
5
Handling Logical Character Dependency in Phylogenetic Inference: Extensive Performance Testing of Assumptions and Solutions Using Simulated and Empirical Data.处理系统发育推断中的逻辑字符相关性:使用模拟和经验数据对假设和解决方案进行广泛的性能测试。
Syst Biol. 2023 Jun 17;72(3):662-680. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syad006.
6
Discrete and morphometric traits reveal contrasting patterns and processes in the macroevolutionary history of a clade of scorpions.离散和形态测量特征揭示了蝎子一个分支宏观进化历史中的对比模式和过程。
J Evol Biol. 2017 Apr;30(4):814-825. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13050. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Scorpion higher phylogeny and classification, taxonomic anarchy, and standards for peer review in online publishing.蝎子的高级系统发育与分类、分类学混乱以及在线出版中的同行评审标准。
Cladistics. 2005 Oct;21(5):446-494. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00073.x.
8
Use of Continuous Traits Can Improve Morphological Phylogenetics.连续性状的使用可以改进形态系统发生学。
Syst Biol. 2018 Mar 1;67(2):328-339. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syx072.
9
Reassessing the role of morphology in bryophyte phylogenetics: Combined data improves phylogenetic inference despite character conflict.重新评估形态在苔藓植物系统发育学中的作用:尽管存在特征冲突,但组合数据仍能改善系统发育推断。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020 Feb;143:106662. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106662. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
10
Morphometric variation in the hominoid orbital aperture: a case study with implications for the use of variable characters in Miocene catarrhine systematics.类人猿眼眶孔径的形态测量变异:一项对中新世狭鼻猿系统分类中可变特征应用有启示意义的案例研究。
J Hum Evol. 2001 Apr;40(4):301-18. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0455.

引用本文的文献

1
Morphological innovation did not drive diversification in Mesozoic-Cenozoic brachiopods.中生代-新生代腕足动物的形态创新并未推动其多样化。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct;8(10):1948-1958. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02491-9. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
The better to eat you with: morphological disparity and enamel ultrastructure in odontocetes.吃得更好:齿鲸类的形态差异和牙釉质超微结构。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 8;13(1):16969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44112-8.
3
Morphological volatility precedes ecological innovation in early echinoderms.形态变化的不稳定性先于早期棘皮动物的生态创新。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar;6(3):263-272. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01656-0. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
4
Selectivity and the effect of mass extinctions on disparity and functional ecology.选择性以及大规模灭绝事件对差异度和功能生态学的影响。
Sci Adv. 2021 May 5;7(19). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf4072. Print 2021 May.
5
Fossil palm reading: using fruits to reveal the deep roots of palm diversity.化石掌纹学:利用果实揭示手掌多样性的深厚根源。
Am J Bot. 2021 Mar;108(3):472-494. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1616. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
6
The patterns and modes of the evolution of disparity in Mesozoic birds.中生代鸟类差异演化的模式与方式。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Feb 10;288(1944):20203105. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3105. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Character Coding and Inapplicable Data.字符编码与不适用数据。
Cladistics. 1999 Dec;15(4):363-371. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00272.x.
2
Exploring Phylogenetic Relationships within Myriapoda and the Effects of Matrix Composition and Occupancy on Phylogenomic Reconstruction.探索多足纲内部的系统发育关系以及矩阵组成和占有率对系统发育基因组重建的影响。
Syst Biol. 2016 Sep;65(5):871-89. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw041. Epub 2016 May 9.
3
Use of secondary data in numerical taxonomy of the genus Erwinia.欧文氏菌属数值分类中二次数据的应用。
J Bacteriol. 1965 Dec;90(6):1638-44. doi: 10.1128/jb.90.6.1638-1644.1965.