Kitagawa Satoshi, Osada Takashi, Kaneko Kimihiko, Takahashi Toshiyuki, Suzuki Norihiro, Nakahara Jin
Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine.
Department of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine.
Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2018 Dec 21;58(12):737-744. doi: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001184. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
We report an 18 year-old-male, who had been aware of decreased visual acuity for 6 months, newly presented with paresis and sensory disturbance in his right leg. On admission, his critical flicker frequency was reduced bilaterally, and his spinal cord MRI revealed T-hyperintense lesions in cervical and thoracic cord with occasional contrast enhancements, but none of them were longitudinally extensive. There was no evidence of T-hyperintense in his brain MRI. Anti-aquapolin-4 (AQP4) antibody was negative but the patient was positive for oligoclonal bands in his cerebrospinal fluid. The patient was tentatively diagnosed as opticospinal multiple sclerosis (OSMS). However, he later tuned out to be positive for anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody. The 2017 revised McDonald criteria don't take anti-MOG antibody into account in detail as to how clinicians should deal with patients fulfilling the MS criteria when they were also positive for anti-MOG antibody, because of its difficult problem of independence. So, we need to accumulate knowledge about these cases.
我们报告一名18岁男性,其视力下降6个月,近期出现右腿轻瘫和感觉障碍。入院时,他双侧临界闪烁频率降低,脊髓MRI显示颈髓和胸髓T2高信号病变,偶尔有强化,但均无纵向广泛分布。其脑部MRI未显示T2高信号。抗水通道蛋白4(AQP4)抗体阴性,但患者脑脊液寡克隆带阳性。该患者初步诊断为视神经脊髓型多发性硬化(OSMS)。然而,他后来抗髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白(MOG)抗体检测呈阳性。由于抗MOG抗体存在难以独立鉴别的问题,2017年修订的麦克唐纳标准未详细说明临床医生应如何处理符合MS标准且抗MOG抗体也呈阳性的患者。因此,我们需要积累关于这些病例的知识。