Suppr超能文献

中文版内部、个人和情境归因问卷(C-IPSAQ)的心理计量学研究。

A psychometric investigation of the Chinese version of the Internal, Personal and Situational Attributions Questionnaire (C-IPSAQ).

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, P. R. China.

Department of Psychiatry, Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310013, P. R. China.

出版信息

Transl Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 28;8(1):256. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0314-4.

Abstract

The IPSAQ is a self-administered instrument designed to evaluate individuals' attributional style (AS). The purpose of this study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Internal, Personal and Situational Attributions Questionnaire (C-IPSAQ). We also investigate if patients with depression and patients with delusions exhibit attributional biases. The English version of IPSAQ was translated into Chinese and back-translated into English for use in this study. 200 normal control individuals, 47 depressed patients, and 41 delusional patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were recruited for this study. Psychometric properties of this questionnaire were evaluated. The IPSAQ was found to have good internal consistency as a scale. The mean Cronbach's alpha of the six subscales was 0.697. The inter-rater reliability was also acceptable. The concurrent validity analysis revealed that the C-IPSAQ was significantly correlated with ASQ. The group-comparison analyses showed differences in attributional style between patients with depression and patients with delusions compared to normal controls. We confirmed the reliability and validity of the C-IPSAQ, and that the instrument can discriminate specific attributional biases between different patient populations. The C-IPSAQ is a valid instrument to assess attributional style in delusional and depressed patients.

摘要

IPSAS 是一个自我管理的工具,旨在评估个体的归因风格(AS)。本研究的目的是检验中文版内部、个人和情境归因问卷(C-IPSAQ)的心理测量特性。我们还调查了抑郁患者和妄想患者是否存在归因偏差。IPSAS 的英文版本被翻译成中文,并回译为英文,用于本研究。本研究共招募了 200 名正常对照组、47 名抑郁患者和 41 名被诊断为精神分裂症的妄想患者。评估了该问卷的心理测量特性。IPSAS 作为一个量表具有良好的内部一致性。六个分量表的平均 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.697。评分者间信度也可以接受。同时效度分析显示,C-IPSAQ 与 ASQ 显著相关。组间比较分析显示,与正常对照组相比,抑郁患者和妄想患者的归因方式存在差异。我们证实了 C-IPSAQ 的可靠性和有效性,并且该工具可以区分不同患者群体之间的特定归因偏差。C-IPSAQ 是评估妄想和抑郁患者归因风格的有效工具。

相似文献

7
Attributional biases, paranoia, and depression in early psychosis.早期精神病中的归因偏见、妄想和抑郁。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2013 Nov;52(4):408-23. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12026. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
9
Persecutory delusions and attributional style.被害妄想与归因风格。
Br J Med Psychol. 1989 Jun;62(2):191-8. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1989.tb02826.x.
10
Depressive attributional style: the role of self-esteem.抑郁归因风格:自尊的作用。
J Pers. 1987 Dec;55(4):631-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00456.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Attributional style among youth at clinical risk for psychosis.青年精神分裂症高危人群的归因风格。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;7(1):84-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2012.00347.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
2
Attribution style as a factor in psychosis and symptom resolution.归因方式作为精神病及症状缓解的一个因素。
Schizophr Res. 2008 Sep;104(1-3):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 Jul 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验