Keeley Jared W, Reed Geoffrey M, Roberts Michael C, Evans Spencer C, Robles Rebeca, Matsumoto Chihiro, Brewin Chris R, Cloitre Marylène, Perkonigg Axel, Rousseau Cécile, Gureje Oye, Lovell Anne M, Sharan Pratap, Maercker Andreas
Mississippi State University, USA.
World Health Organization, Switzerland.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016 May-Aug;16(2):109-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
As part of the development of the Eleventh Revision of International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11), the World Health Organization Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse is conducting a series of case-controlled field studies using a new and powerful method to test the application by clinicians of the proposed ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for mental and behavioural disorders. This article describes the case-controlled field study for Disorders Specifically Associated with Stress. Using a vignette-based experimental methodology, 1,738 international mental health professionals diagnosed standardized cases designed to test key differences between the proposed diagnostic guidelines for ICD-11 and corresponding guidelines for ICD-10. Across eight comparisons, several proposed changes for ICD-11, including the addition of Complex PTSD and Prolonged Grief Disorder, produced significantly improved diagnostic decisions and clearer application of diagnostic guidelines compared to ICD-10. However, several key areas were also identified, such as the description of the diagnostic requirement of re-experiencing in PTSD, in which the guidelines were not consistently applied as intended. These results informed specific revisions to improve the clarity of the proposed ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines. The next step will be to further test these guidelines in clinic-based studies using real patients in relevant settings.
作为《国际疾病和相关健康问题分类》第十一次修订版(ICD - 11)制定工作的一部分,世界卫生组织精神卫生和药物滥用司正在开展一系列病例对照实地研究,采用一种全新且强大的方法来测试临床医生对拟议的ICD - 11精神和行为障碍诊断指南的应用情况。本文描述了与压力特别相关的障碍的病例对照实地研究。采用基于病例 vignette 的实验方法,1738 名国际精神卫生专业人员对标准化病例进行了诊断,这些病例旨在测试拟议的 ICD - 11 诊断指南与 ICD - 10 相应指南之间的关键差异。在八项比较中,与 ICD - 10 相比,ICD - 11 的几项拟议更改,包括增加复杂性创伤后应激障碍和持续性悲伤障碍,显著改善了诊断决策并使诊断指南的应用更加清晰。然而,也确定了几个关键领域,例如创伤后应激障碍中重新体验诊断要求的描述,其中指南并未如预期那样始终如一地应用。这些结果为改进拟议的 ICD - 11 诊断指南的清晰度提供了具体修订依据。下一步将在相关环境中使用真实患者的临床研究中进一步测试这些指南。