• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)国际创伤问卷的项目反应模型验证

Item Response Model Validation of the German ICD-11 International Trauma Questionnaire for PTSD and CPTSD.

作者信息

Christen Daniel, Killikelly Clare, Maercker Andreas, Augsburger Mareike

机构信息

Division of Psychopathology, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Eur. 2021 Dec 23;3(4):e5501. doi: 10.32872/cpe.5501. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.32872/cpe.5501
PMID:36398291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9667225/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and the complex variant (CPTSD) were newly conceptualised. The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) was developed as a brief self-report measure to screen for both disorders. The English original version has been rigorously tested and presents convincing psychometric properties. The aim of the current study was to validate the German version by means of item response theory (IRT).

METHOD

This is a secondary analysis of a representative, trauma-exposed adult sample from the German general population (N = 500). 1- and 2-parameter logistic IRT models (i.e. examination on an item level), diagnostic rates and confirmatory factor analyses were calculated.

RESULTS

All items showed good model fit and acceptable to good performance aligning with the items of the English original except for item C1 (Long time to calm down) which had a high endorsement rate and a low discriminatory power yielding low information gain. CPTSD diagnostic rate of 3.2% was lower than in comparable literature. Confirmatory factor analysis deemed the six first-order, two second-order factors model superior.

CONCLUSION

Measurement and factorial validity of the German version of the ITQ was confirmed. The German translation matches the English original in most psychometric properties and can thus be used for research and clinical practice.

摘要

背景

在《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD - 11)中,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂型创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)有了新的概念。国际创伤问卷(ITQ)被开发出来作为一种简短的自我报告测量工具,用于筛查这两种障碍。其英文原版已经过严格测试,呈现出令人信服的心理测量特性。本研究的目的是通过项目反应理论(IRT)验证德文版。

方法

这是对来自德国普通人群的具有代表性的受过创伤的成年样本(N = 500)进行的二次分析。计算了单参数和双参数逻辑IRT模型(即项目层面的检验)、诊断率和验证性因素分析。

结果

除项目C1(平静下来需要很长时间)外,所有项目均显示出良好的模型拟合,且表现与英文原版项目相符,该项目认可率高但区分度低,信息增益低。CPTSD诊断率为3.2%,低于可比文献中的诊断率。验证性因素分析认为六因素一阶、两因素二阶模型更优。

结论

确认了德文版ITQ的测量和因素效度。德文翻译在大多数心理测量特性上与英文原版匹配,因此可用于研究和临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e727/9667225/fe95e68ece14/cpe-03-5501-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e727/9667225/eb70595ed31b/cpe-03-5501-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e727/9667225/fe95e68ece14/cpe-03-5501-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e727/9667225/eb70595ed31b/cpe-03-5501-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e727/9667225/fe95e68ece14/cpe-03-5501-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
Item Response Model Validation of the German ICD-11 International Trauma Questionnaire for PTSD and CPTSD.德国创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)国际创伤问卷的项目反应模型验证
Clin Psychol Eur. 2021 Dec 23;3(4):e5501. doi: 10.32872/cpe.5501. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Symptom structure of ICD-11 Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) in trauma-exposed foster children: examining the International Trauma Questionnaire - Child and Adolescent Version (ITQ-CA).遭受创伤的寄养儿童中国际疾病分类第11版复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的症状结构:对儿童和青少年版国际创伤问卷(ITQ-CA)的检验
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Nov 5;11(1):1818974. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1818974.
3
Psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) examined in a Norwegian trauma-exposed clinical sample.在挪威遭受创伤的临床样本中对国际创伤问卷(ITQ)的心理测量特性进行了检验。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Aug 14;11(1):1796187. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1796187.
4
Translation and validation of the Chinese ICD-11 International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) for the Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD).用于评估创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的中文版国际创伤问卷(ITQ)的翻译与验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 May 15;10(1):1608718. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1608718. eCollection 2019.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch International Trauma Questionnaire for the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases posttraumatic stress disorder and complex posttraumatic stress disorder.《荷兰国际创伤问卷的心理计量学评估:用于国际疾病分类第 11 版创伤后应激障碍和复杂型创伤后应激障碍》
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Nov;16(8):1347-1356. doi: 10.1037/tra0001576. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
6
Translation and validation of the Dari International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) in Afghan asylum seekers and refugees.达利国际创伤问卷(ITQ)在阿富汗寻求庇护者和难民中的翻译和验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2158428. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2158428.
7
Examination of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire - Child and Adolescent version (ITQ-CA) in a sample of Danish children and adolescents exposed to abuse.使用国际创伤问卷-儿童和青少年版(ITQ-CA)对丹麦受虐待的儿童和青少年样本中 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的检查。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2178761. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2178761.
8
Validation of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in foster children using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷对寄养儿童的 ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 进行验证。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jan;141(1):60-73. doi: 10.1111/acps.13100. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
9
Measuring post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder using the International Trauma Questionnaire: results from a Hungarian clinical and non-clinical sample.使用国际创伤问卷测量创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍:来自匈牙利临床和非临床样本的结果。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2152929. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2152929.
10
Validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire-Child and Adolescent Version (ITQ-CA) in a Chinese mental health service seeking adolescent sample.国际创伤问卷儿童及青少年版(ITQ-CA)在中国寻求心理健康服务的青少年样本中的效度验证。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022 Aug 12;16(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13034-022-00497-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Complex Trauma and Strengths Questionnaire: psychometric evaluation.原住民及托雷斯海峡岛民复杂创伤与优势问卷:心理测量学评估
Aust J Psychol. 2024 May 23;76(1):2335917. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2024.2335917. eCollection 2024.
2
Long-Term Improvements of Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) Symptoms After Multimodal Psychodynamic Inpatient Rehabilitation Treatment-An Observational Single Center Pilot Study.多模式心理动力住院康复治疗后复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)症状的长期改善——一项单中心观察性试点研究
J Clin Psychol. 2025 Aug;81(8):739-754. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23809. Epub 2025 May 12.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic literature review of factor analytic and mixture models of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.采用国际创伤问卷对 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的因子分析和混合模型的系统文献回顾。
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Apr;79:102381. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102381. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
Symptom structure of ICD-11 Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) in trauma-exposed foster children: examining the International Trauma Questionnaire - Child and Adolescent Version (ITQ-CA).遭受创伤的寄养儿童中国际疾病分类第11版复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的症状结构:对儿童和青少年版国际创伤问卷(ITQ-CA)的检验
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Nov 5;11(1):1818974. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1818974.
3
Mentalization-based treatment versus bona fide treatment for patients with borderline personality disorder in Germany (MAGNET): study protocol of a prospective, multi-centre randomized controlled trial.
德国边缘型人格障碍患者的基于心理化的治疗与真诚治疗对比研究(MAGNET):一项前瞻性、多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06809-0.
4
Polish adaptation and validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) for PTSD and cPTSD according to ICD-11 in non-clinical and clinical samples.根据国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11),在非临床和临床样本中对用于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(cPTSD)的国际创伤问卷(ITQ)进行波兰语改编及验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2468116. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2468116. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
5
BDSM and masochistic sexual fantasies in women with borderline personality disorder: simply on the spectrum of "normality" or source of suffering?边缘型人格障碍女性中的BDSM及受虐性性幻想:仅仅处于“正常”范围内,还是痛苦之源?
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2025 Feb 22;12(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40479-025-00283-6.
6
Predicting PTSD and complex PTSD from interpersonal violence in Japanese school-based extracurricular sports activities: using the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ).利用国际创伤问卷(ITQ)从日本校内课外体育活动中的人际暴力预测创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍(complex PTSD)
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 6;15:1463641. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1463641. eCollection 2024.
7
Mapping the availability of translated versions of posttraumatic stress disorder screening questionnaires for adults: A scoping review.成人创伤后应激障碍筛查问卷翻译版本的可及性映射:一项范围综述
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Dec;13(2):2143019. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2143019. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
8
Utilization of Mental Health Provision, Epistemic Stance and Comorbid Psychopathology of Individuals with Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders (CPTSD)-Results from a Representative German Observational Study.复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)患者的心理健康服务利用情况、认知立场及共病精神病理学——一项德国代表性观察性研究的结果
J Clin Med. 2024 May 7;13(10):2735. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102735.
9
Assessing complex PTSD and PTSD: validation of the German version of the International Trauma Interview (ITI).评估复杂创伤后应激障碍和创伤后应激障碍:国际创伤访谈(ITI)德语版的验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2344364. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2344364. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
Improvements of complex post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms during a multimodal psychodynamic inpatient rehabilitation treatment - results of an observational single-centre pilot study.复杂创伤后应激障碍症状在多模式心理动力学住院康复治疗中的改善 - 一项观察性单中心试点研究的结果。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2333221. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2333221. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD among organized violence survivors in modern South Korean history of political oppression.
《政治压迫下现代韩国历史中组织性暴力幸存者的 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂 PTSD》
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Mar;34(2):203-214. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1839889. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
4
COVID-19-related fear and stress among individuals who experienced child abuse: The mediating effect of complex posttraumatic stress disorder.COVID-19 相关恐惧和压力在经历过儿童虐待的个体中的表现:复杂创伤后应激障碍的中介作用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Dec;110(Pt 2):104694. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104694. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
5
Traumatic experiences, ICD-11 PTSD, ICD-11 complex PTSD, and the overlap with ICD-10 diagnoses.创伤经历、ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍、ICD-11 复杂创伤后应激障碍,以及与 ICD-10 诊断的重叠。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 May;141(5):421-431. doi: 10.1111/acps.13161. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
6
ICD-11 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the United States: A Population-Based Study.美国基于人群的研究:ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Dec;32(6):833-842. doi: 10.1002/jts.22454. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
7
Examining the boundaries between ICD-11 PTSD/CPTSD and depression and anxiety symptoms: A network analysis perspective.审视国际疾病分类第11版中创伤后应激障碍/复杂创伤后应激障碍与抑郁和焦虑症状之间的界限:网络分析视角
J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 1;262:429-439. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.060. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
8
The relationship between ICD-11 PTSD, complex PTSD and dissociative experiences.ICD-11 PTSD、复杂性 PTSD 和分离体验之间的关系。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2020 Jan-Feb;21(1):62-72. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2019.1675113. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
9
Risk factors and comorbidity of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD: Findings from a trauma-exposed population based sample of adults in the United Kingdom.ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 的风险因素和共病:英国基于创伤暴露人群的成年人样本的研究结果。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Sep;36(9):887-894. doi: 10.1002/da.22934. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
10
A Cross-Cultural Comparison of ICD-11 Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Networks in Austria, the United Kingdom, and Lithuania.奥地利、英国和立陶宛ICD-11复杂创伤后应激障碍症状网络的跨文化比较
J Trauma Stress. 2020 Feb;33(1):41-51. doi: 10.1002/jts.22361. Epub 2019 Jan 28.