• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄罗斯精神卫生专业人员参与世界卫生组织《国际疾病分类第11版》的制定工作。

Engagement of Russian Mental Health Professionals in the Development of WHO's ICD-11.

作者信息

Rebello Tahilia J, Kulygina Maya A, Krasnov Valery N, Pike Kathleen M, Reed Geoffrey M

出版信息

Consort Psychiatr. 2021 May 25;2(2):17-22. doi: 10.17816/CP79. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.17816/CP79
PMID:39070738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11272319/
Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) has officially approved the next version of its global diagnostic system, the (ICD-11). Processes to implement the ICD-11 are now underway. Developing the ICD-11 chapter on Mental, Behavioural and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, in line with WHO's core priorities to enhance the clinical utility, reliability, and global applicability of the guidelines, necessitated a large-scale scientifically-rigorous research program. Such a program of global field studies engaged mental health professionals from across the world, with substantial contributions from clinicians in the Russian Federation. This paper systematically highlights the substantive roles played by Russian clinicians in all steps of development of the mental, behavioural, and neurodevelopmental disorder guidelines, including their participation in the following: 1) early formative field studies that informed the organizing principles and overarching structure of the ICD-11; 2) large-scale online studies that used a case-controlled methodology to evaluate the guideline's clinical utility and the accuracy with which the new ICD-11 guidelines could be applied by global clinicians; 3) an online network of mental health professionals who provided direct feedback on the ICD-11 to WHO (also known as the Global Clinical Practice Network, www.globalclinicalpractice.net) with over 16,000 members from 160 countries, and with the Russian Federation being in the top five most represented countries in the network; 4) clinic-based field studies that tested the reliability and clinical utility of the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines; and 5) development and participation in training programs that prepare clinicians in implementing the diagnostic guidelines in clinical settings. In these many ways, Russian clinicians have substantively and directly contributed to efforts to maximize the clinical usefulness, consistency, acceptability, and applicability of the ICD-11's mental, behavioural, and neurodevelopmental disorder guidelines. This substantial engagement of clinicians will conceivably facilitate the adoption and use of the guidelines by clinicians in the Russian Federation and other Russian-speaking countries, as the ICD-11 is implemented over the coming years.

摘要

世界卫生组织(WHO)已正式批准其全球诊断系统的下一版本,即《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)。目前,ICD - 11的实施工作正在进行中。根据WHO提高指南的临床实用性、可靠性和全球适用性的核心优先事项,制定ICD - 11中关于精神、行为和神经发育障碍的章节需要开展大规模科学严谨的研究项目。这样一个全球实地研究项目吸引了来自世界各地的心理健康专业人员参与,俄罗斯联邦的临床医生也做出了重大贡献。本文系统地突出了俄罗斯临床医生在精神、行为和神经发育障碍指南制定的各个步骤中所发挥的重要作用,包括他们参与以下方面:1)早期形成性实地研究,为ICD - 11的组织原则和总体结构提供了依据;2)大规模在线研究,采用病例对照方法评估指南的临床实用性以及全球临床医生应用新ICD - 11指南的准确性;3)一个心理健康专业人员在线网络,该网络为WHO提供了关于ICD - 11的直接反馈(也称为全球临床实践网络,网址为www.globalclinicalpractice.net),有来自160个国家的16000多名成员,俄罗斯联邦是该网络中代表人数最多的五个国家之一;4)基于诊所的实地研究,测试ICD - 11诊断指南的可靠性和临床实用性;5)开发并参与培训项目,帮助临床医生在临床环境中实施诊断指南。通过这些多种方式,俄罗斯临床医生为最大限度地提高ICD - 11精神、行为和神经发育障碍指南的临床实用性、一致性、可接受性和适用性做出了实质性且直接的贡献。随着ICD - 11在未来几年的实施,临床医生的这种大量参与有望促进俄罗斯联邦和其他说俄语国家的临床医生采用和使用这些指南。

相似文献

1
Engagement of Russian Mental Health Professionals in the Development of WHO's ICD-11.俄罗斯精神卫生专业人员参与世界卫生组织《国际疾病分类第11版》的制定工作。
Consort Psychiatr. 2021 May 25;2(2):17-22. doi: 10.17816/CP79. eCollection 2021.
2
Anxiety and Fear-Related Disorders in the ICD-11: Results from a Global Case-controlled Field Study.《ICD-11 中的焦虑和恐惧相关障碍:一项全球性病例对照现场研究的结果》。
Arch Med Res. 2019 Nov;50(8):490-501. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
3
Letter to the Editor: EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE ICD-11 CHAPTER ON MENTAL DISORDERS.致编辑的信:与 ICD-11 精神障碍章节相关的教育活动。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):291-292. doi: 10.5080/u26898.
4
The classification of feeding and eating disorders in the ICD-11: results of a field study comparing proposed ICD-11 guidelines with existing ICD-10 guidelines.《ICD-11 中喂养和进食障碍的分类:一项现场研究的结果,该研究比较了拟议的 ICD-11 指南与现有的 ICD-10 指南》。
BMC Med. 2019 May 14;17(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1327-4.
5
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
6
Developing a science of clinical utility in diagnostic classification systems field study strategies for ICD-11 mental and behavioral disorders.在诊断分类系统领域中发展临床实用性科学:ICD-11 精神和行为障碍的现场研究策略。
Am Psychol. 2016 Jan;71(1):3-16. doi: 10.1037/a0039972.
7
Mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders in the ICD-11: an international perspective on key changes and controversies.《国际疾病分类第 11 版中的精神、行为和神经发育障碍:关键变化和争议的国际视角》
BMC Med. 2020 Jan 27;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-1495-2.
8
[Web-based field studies on diagnostic classification and code assignment of mental disorders: comparison of ICD-11 and ICD-10].[基于网络的精神障碍诊断分类与编码赋值实地研究:ICD-11与ICD-10的比较]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2018 Mar;86(3):163-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-100508. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders.《国际疾病分类第11版》中精神、行为和神经发育障碍分类的创新与变化。
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):3-19. doi: 10.1002/wps.20611.
10
The Italian ICD-11 field trial: clinical utility of diagnostic guidelines for schizophrenia and related disorders.意大利国际疾病分类第11版现场试验:精神分裂症及相关障碍诊断指南的临床实用性
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Jan 24;14:4. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-0338-z. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of diagnostic judgments using ICD-11 vs. ICD-10 diagnostic guidelines for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders.使用 ICD-11 与 ICD-10 诊断指南对强迫症及相关障碍进行诊断判断的准确性。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Aug 1;273:328-340. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.103. Epub 2020 May 18.
2
Anxiety and Fear-Related Disorders in the ICD-11: Results from a Global Case-controlled Field Study.《ICD-11 中的焦虑和恐惧相关障碍:一项全球性病例对照现场研究的结果》。
Arch Med Res. 2019 Nov;50(8):490-501. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
3
Mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders in the ICD-11: an international perspective on key changes and controversies.《国际疾病分类第 11 版中的精神、行为和神经发育障碍:关键变化和争议的国际视角》
BMC Med. 2020 Jan 27;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-1495-2.
4
The reliability and clinical utility of ICD-11 schizoaffective disorder: A field trial.ICD-11 分裂情感障碍的可靠性和临床实用性:一项现场试验。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jun;208:235-241. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
5
Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders.《国际疾病分类第11版》中精神、行为和神经发育障碍分类的创新与变化。
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):3-19. doi: 10.1002/wps.20611.
6
Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians' decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies.用于研究临床医生决策的案例法:在国际疾病分类第11版实地研究中的有效性、实用性及应用
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015 May-Aug;15(2):160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
Clinical utility of ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for high-burden mental disorders: results from mental health settings in 13 countries.国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)中高负担精神障碍诊断指南的临床实用性:来自13个国家心理健康机构的结果
World Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;17(3):306-315. doi: 10.1002/wps.20581.
8
The ICD-11 developmental field study of reliability of diagnoses of high-burden mental disorders: results among adult patients in mental health settings of 13 countries.国际疾病分类第11版高负担精神障碍诊断可靠性的发育领域研究:13个国家心理健康机构成年患者的研究结果
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):174-186. doi: 10.1002/wps.20524.
9
Do mental health professionals use diagnostic classifications the way we think they do? A global survey.心理健康专业人员使用诊断分类的方式是我们所认为的那样吗?一项全球调查。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):187-195. doi: 10.1002/wps.20525.
10
Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC).理解和分类精神障碍的三种方法:ICD-11、DSM-5 和国家精神卫生研究所的研究领域标准 (RDoC)。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Sep;18(2):72-145. doi: 10.1177/1529100617727266.