Hooper Lee, Al-Khudairy Lena, Abdelhamid Asmaa S, Rees Karen, Brainard Julii S, Brown Tracey J, Ajabnoor Sarah M, O'Brien Alex T, Winstanley Lauren E, Donaldson Daisy H, Song Fujian, Deane Katherine Ho
Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, UK, NR4 7TJ.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 29;11(11):CD011094. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011094.pub4.
Omega-6 fats are polyunsaturated fats vital for many physiological functions, but their effect on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is debated.
To assess effects of increasing omega-6 fats (linoleic acid (LA), gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA) and arachidonic acid (AA)) on CVD and all-cause mortality.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase to May 2017 and clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to September 2016, without language restrictions. We checked trials included in relevant systematic reviews.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing higher versus lower omega-6 fat intake in adults with or without CVD, assessing effects over at least 12 months. We included full texts, abstracts, trials registry entries and unpublished studies. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, CVD events, risk factors (blood lipids, adiposity, blood pressure), and potential adverse events. We excluded trials where we could not separate omega-6 fat effects from those of other dietary, lifestyle or medication interventions.
Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts, assessed trials for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of included trials. We wrote to authors of included studies. Meta-analyses used random-effects analysis, while sensitivity analyses used fixed-effects and limited analyses to trials at low summary risk of bias. We assessed GRADE quality of evidence for 'Summary of findings' tables.
We included 19 RCTs in 6461 participants who were followed for one to eight years. Seven trials assessed the effects of supplemental GLA and 12 of LA, none DGLA or AA; the omega-6 fats usually displaced dietary saturated or monounsaturated fats. We assessed three RCTs as being at low summary risk of bias.Primary outcomes: we found low-quality evidence that increased intake of omega-6 fats may make little or no difference to all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.12, 740 deaths, 4506 randomised, 10 trials) or CVD events (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.15, 1404 people experienced events of 4962 randomised, 7 trials). We are uncertain whether increasing omega-6 fats affects CVD mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.55, 472 deaths, 4019 randomised, 7 trials), coronary heart disease events (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.17, 1059 people with events of 3997 randomised, 7 trials), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.20, 817 events, 2879 participants, 2 trials) or stroke (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.45 to 4.11, 54 events, 3730 participants, 4 trials), as we assessed the evidence as being of very low quality. We found no evidence of dose-response or duration effects for any primary outcome, but there was a suggestion of greater protection in participants with lower baseline omega-6 intake across outcomes.Additional key outcomes: we found increased intake of omega-6 fats may reduce myocardial infarction (MI) risk (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.02, 609 events, 4606 participants, 7 trials, low-quality evidence). High-quality evidence suggests increasing omega-6 fats reduces total serum cholesterol a little in the long term (mean difference (MD) -0.33 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.16, I = 81%; heterogeneity partially explained by dose, 4280 participants, 10 trials). Increasing omega-6 fats probably has little or no effect on adiposity (body mass index (BMI) MD -0.20 kg/m, 95% CI -0.56 to 0.16, 371 participants, 1 trial, moderate-quality evidence). It may make little or no difference to serum triglycerides (MD -0.01 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.21, 834 participants, 5 trials), HDL (MD -0.01 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.02, 1995 participants, 4 trials) or low-density lipoprotein (MD -0.04 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.14, 244 participants, 2 trials, low-quality evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This is the most extensive systematic assessment of effects of omega-6 fats on cardiovascular health, mortality, lipids and adiposity to date, using previously unpublished data. We found no evidence that increasing omega-6 fats reduces cardiovascular outcomes other than MI, where 53 people may need to increase omega-6 fat intake to prevent 1 person from experiencing MI. Although benefits of omega-6 fats remain to be proven, increasing omega-6 fats may be of benefit in people at high risk of MI. Increased omega-6 fats reduce serum total cholesterol but not other blood fat fractions or adiposity.
ω-6脂肪酸是对许多生理功能至关重要的多不饱和脂肪,但其对心血管疾病(CVD)风险的影响存在争议。
评估增加ω-6脂肪酸(亚油酸(LA)、γ-亚麻酸(GLA)、二高-γ-亚麻酸(DGLA)和花生四烯酸(AA))对心血管疾病和全因死亡率的影响。
我们检索了截至2017年5月的Cochrane系统评价数据库、MEDLINE和Embase,以及截至2016年9月的ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台,无语言限制。我们检查了相关系统评价中纳入的试验。
我们纳入了比较有或无心血管疾病的成年人中较高与较低ω-6脂肪酸摄入量的随机对照试验(RCT),评估至少12个月的影响。我们纳入了全文、摘要、试验注册条目和未发表的研究。结局包括全因死亡率、心血管疾病死亡率、心血管疾病事件、风险因素(血脂、肥胖、血压)和潜在不良事件。我们排除了无法将ω-6脂肪酸的影响与其他饮食、生活方式或药物干预的影响区分开来的试验。
两位作者独立筛选标题/摘要,评估试验是否纳入,提取数据,并评估纳入试验的偏倚风险。我们写信给纳入研究的作者。荟萃分析采用随机效应分析,敏感性分析采用固定效应分析,并对偏倚汇总风险较低的试验进行有限分析。我们评估了“结果总结”表中证据的GRADE质量。
我们纳入了19项RCT,共6461名参与者,随访1至8年。7项试验评估了补充GLA的效果,12项评估了LA的效果,没有评估DGLA或AA的效果;ω-6脂肪酸通常替代饮食中的饱和或单不饱和脂肪。我们评估3项RCT的偏倚汇总风险较低。
我们发现低质量证据表明,增加ω-6脂肪酸摄入量对全因死亡率(风险比(RR)1.00,95%置信区间(CI)0.88至1.12,740例死亡,4506例随机分组,10项试验)或心血管疾病事件(RR 0.97,95%CI 0.81至1.15,4962例随机分组中有1404人发生事件,7项试验)可能几乎没有影响。我们不确定增加ω-6脂肪酸是否会影响心血管疾病死亡率(RR 1.09,95%CI 0.76至1.55,472例死亡,4019例随机分组,7项试验)、冠心病事件(RR 0.88,95%CI 0.66至1.17,3997例随机分组中有1059人发生事件,7项试验)、主要不良心脑血管事件(RR 0.84,95%CI 0.59至1.20,817例事件,2879名参与者,2项试验)或中风(RR 1.36,95%CI 0.45至4.11,54例事件,3730名参与者,4项试验),因为我们评估这些证据质量非常低。我们没有发现任何主要结局存在剂量反应或持续时间效应的证据,但有迹象表明,在所有结局中,基线ω-6摄入量较低的参与者得到的保护更大。
我们发现增加ω-6脂肪酸摄入量可能会降低心肌梗死(MI)风险(RR 0.88,95%CI 0.76至1.02,609例事件,4606名参与者,7项试验,低质量证据)。高质量证据表明,增加ω-6脂肪酸从长期来看会使总血清胆固醇略有降低(平均差(MD)-0.33 mmol/L,95%CI -0.50至-0.16,I² = 8I%;异质性部分由剂量解释,4280名参与者,10项试验)。增加ω-6脂肪酸可能对肥胖几乎没有影响(体重指数(BMI)MD -0.20 kg/m²,95%CI -0.56至0.16,371名参与者,1项试验,中等质量证据)。它对血清甘油三酯(MD -0.01 mmol/L,95%CI -0.23至0.21,834名参与者,5项试验)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)(MD -0.01 mmol/L,95%CI -0.03至0.02,1995名参与者,4项试验)或低密度脂蛋白(MD -0.04 mmol/L,95%CI -0.21至0.14,244名参与者,2项试验,低质量证据)可能几乎没有影响。
这是迄今为止对ω-6脂肪酸对心血管健康、死亡率、血脂和肥胖影响的最广泛系统评估,使用了之前未发表的数据。我们没有发现证据表明增加ω-6脂肪酸除了降低心肌梗死风险外还能降低心血管疾病结局,即每增加53人摄入ω-6脂肪酸可预防1人发生心肌梗死。虽然ω-6脂肪酸的益处仍有待证实,但增加ω-6脂肪酸摄入量可能对心肌梗死高危人群有益。增加ω-6脂肪酸可降低血清总胆固醇,但对其他血脂成分或肥胖无影响。