Pinsky M R, Hrehocik D, Culpepper J A, Snyder J V
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine.
Chest. 1988 Oct;94(4):788-91. doi: 10.1378/chest.94.4.788.
We measured the flow-resistance of five commercially available 10 cm H2O expiratory positive-pressure (EPP) valves (n = five per valve type) at bias flows of between 0 and 2,000 ml/s. We found that individual valves of each type and manufacturer functioned similarly. Different valve types, however, functioned differently: with one type, system pressure was higher than rated (p less than 0.05), and with another type, system pressure was significantly flow-dependent (p less than 0.01). The remaining types of valves had no flow-resistive properties and maintained a system pressure of 10 cmH2O. We conclude that system pressure is not similar in all continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) systems using bias flow and EPP valves. The work of breathing imposed by CPAP circuits will be increased in systems whose EPP valves have flow-dependent properties.
我们在0至2000毫升/秒的偏置流量下测量了五种市售的10厘米水柱呼气正压(EPP)阀的流动阻力(每种阀型n = 5)。我们发现,每种类型和制造商的单个阀门功能相似。然而,不同的阀型功能不同:一种阀型的系统压力高于额定值(p < 0.05),另一种阀型的系统压力明显依赖于流量(p < 0.01)。其余类型的阀门没有流动阻力特性,并保持10厘米水柱的系统压力。我们得出结论,在所有使用偏置流量和EPP阀的持续气道正压通气(CPAP)系统中,系统压力并不相似。在EPP阀具有流量依赖性特性的系统中,CPAP回路施加的呼吸功将会增加。