Moran J L, Homan S, O'Fathartaigh M, Jackson M, Leppard P
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia.
Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(3):148-54. doi: 10.1007/BF01709238.
Inspiratory work imposed by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machines has been a matter of concern. The imposed inspiratory work of CPAP machine circuits (Wcir) and the effect of the total breathing apparatus with endotracheal tube (ETT) and connector included in the circuit (Wapp), were measured in three continuous flow (CF) and various configurations of three demand flow (DF) CPAP machines. The performance was assessed at 0, 5, 10 and 15 cmH2O CPAP using a Michigan Instruments Test Lung Model 1600, internal compliance set at 50 ml/cmH2O, driven at square wave inspiratory flows (VI) of 20, 40 and 60 l/min at a tidal volume of 500 ml. Work, expressed in mJ/l, was calculated from the area of pressure-volume loops. Inspiratory work, Wcir and Wapp, was dependent upon the particular CPAP machine, VI and ETT size, but not upon CPAP level, being maximum at VI 601/min and with ETT 7.0 mm i.d. Work values (Wcir) varied from 50 to 325 mJ/l with both CF and DF machines and up to 1100 mJ/l with ETT and connector (Wapp). No consistent advantage of CF over DF machines was demonstrated. There was little advantage of high gas flows (greater than 5 l/min) in various DF circuits. Within an individual machine maximum negative pressures generated during inspiration correlated with both Wcir and Wapp.
持续气道正压通气(CPAP)机器施加的吸气功一直是人们关注的问题。在三台连续流(CF)和三种按需流(DF)CPAP机器的各种配置中,测量了CPAP机器回路施加的吸气功(Wcir)以及包括气管内导管(ETT)和回路中的连接器在内的整个呼吸装置的效果(Wapp)。使用密歇根仪器测试肺模型1600在0、5、10和15 cmH2O的CPAP水平下评估性能,内部顺应性设定为50 ml/cmH2O,在潮气量为500 ml时以20、40和60 l/min的方波吸气流量(VI)驱动。以mJ/l表示的功由压力-容积环的面积计算得出。吸气功、Wcir和Wapp取决于特定的CPAP机器、VI和ETT尺寸,但不取决于CPAP水平,在VI为60 l/min且ETT内径为7.0 mm时最大。CF和DF机器的功值(Wcir)在50至325 mJ/l之间变化,加上ETT和连接器时(Wapp)高达1100 mJ/l。未证明CF机器相对于DF机器有一致的优势。在各种DF回路中,高气体流量(大于5 l/min)几乎没有优势。在单个机器内,吸气过程中产生的最大负压与Wcir和Wapp都相关。