• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电击枪与现代可植入心脏起搏器

Electrical Stun Gun and Modern Implantable Cardiac Stimulators.

机构信息

1Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.

Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Health Phys. 2019 Jan;116(1):18-26. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000942.

DOI:10.1097/HP.0000000000000942
PMID:30489364
Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate systematically the possible interactions between two types of stun guns and last-generation pacemakers and implantable defibrillators. Experimental measurements were performed on pacemakers and implantable defibrillators from five leading manufacturers, considering the effect of stun gun dart positioning, sensing modality, stun gun shock duration, and defibrillation energy level. More than 300 measurements were collected. No damage or permanent malfunction was observed in either pacemakers or implantable defibrillators. During the stun gun shock, most of the pacemakers entered into the noise reversion mode. However, complete inhibition of the pacing activity was also observed in some of the pacemakers and in all the implantable defibrillators. In implantable defibrillators, standard stun gun shock (duration 5 s) caused the detection of a shockable rhythm and the start of a charging cycle. Prolonged stun gun shocks (10-15 s) triggered the inappropriate delivery of defibrillation therapy in all the implantable defibrillators tested. Also in this case, no damage or permanent malfunction was observed. For pacemakers, in most cases, the stun guns caused them either to switch to the noise reversion mode or to exhibit partial or total pacing inhibition. For implantable defibrillators, in all cases, the stun guns triggered a ventricular fibrillation event detection. No risks resulted when the stun gun was used by a person wearing a pacemaker or an implantable defibrillator. This work provides novel and up-to-date evidence useful for the evaluation of risks to pacemaker/implantable defibrillator wearers due to stun guns.

摘要

本研究旨在系统地研究两种电击枪与最新一代起搏器和植入式除颤器之间可能存在的相互作用。实验测量在五个主要制造商的起搏器和植入式除颤器上进行,考虑了电击枪飞镖定位、感应模式、电击枪电击持续时间和除颤能量水平的影响。共收集了 300 多次测量数据。在起搏器和植入式除颤器中,均未观察到任何损坏或永久性故障。在电击枪电击期间,大多数起搏器进入噪声反转模式。然而,在一些起搏器和所有植入式除颤器中,也观察到起搏活动完全抑制。在植入式除颤器中,标准电击枪电击(持续时间 5 秒)导致检测到可电击节律并开始充电周期。延长的电击枪电击(10-15 秒)在所有测试的植入式除颤器中引发了不适当的除颤治疗的实施。在这种情况下,也未观察到任何损坏或永久性故障。对于起搏器,在大多数情况下,电击枪要么使它们切换到噪声反转模式,要么导致部分或完全起搏抑制。对于植入式除颤器,在所有情况下,电击枪都会引发心室颤动事件的检测。当佩戴起搏器或植入式除颤器的人使用电击枪时,不会产生任何风险。这项工作提供了新颖和最新的证据,有助于评估电击枪对起搏器/植入式除颤器佩戴者的风险。

相似文献

1
Electrical Stun Gun and Modern Implantable Cardiac Stimulators.电击枪与现代可植入心脏起搏器
Health Phys. 2019 Jan;116(1):18-26. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000942.
2
Electrical Stun Gun and Modern Implantable Cardiac Stimulators: Update for a New Stun Gun Model.电击枪与现代植入式心脏刺激器:新型电击枪模型的最新情况
Health Phys. 2021 Mar 1;120(3):344-349. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001332.
3
Do electrical stun guns (TASER-X26) affect the functional integrity of implantable pacemakers and defibrillators?电击枪(泰瑟X26型)会影响植入式心脏起搏器和除颤器的功能完整性吗?
Europace. 2007 Jul;9(7):551-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum058. Epub 2007 May 9.
4
Virtual clinics for follow-up of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children.儿童起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器随访的虚拟诊所。
Cardiol Young. 2019 Oct;29(10):1243-1247. doi: 10.1017/S1047951119001823. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
5
[Leadless pacemakers and subcutaneously implantable cardioverter defibrillators].[无导线起搏器和皮下植入式心律转复除颤器]
Internist (Berl). 2018 Oct;59(10):999-1010. doi: 10.1007/s00108-018-0476-4.
6
Implanted automatic defibrillators: effects of drugs and pacemakers.植入式自动除颤器:药物和起搏器的作用
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Dec;11(12):2250-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05992.x.
7
Remote Monitoring of Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.远程监测永久起搏器和植入式心脏除颤器。
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2021 Sep;13(3):449-457. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
8
Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).大多数植入式心脏复律除颤器/心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者可行无诱导或有限电击测试:多中心ASSURE研究(心律失常单次电击除颤阈值测试与易损性上限:植入式心脏复律除颤器植入的风险降低评估)结果
Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.663112. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
9
[Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the perioperative phase].围手术期的心脏起搏器与植入式心脏复律除颤器
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1993 Jun;28(4):199-212. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-998909.
10
Combined leadless pacemaker and subcutaneous implantable defibrillator therapy: feasibility, safety, and performance.无导线起搏器与皮下植入式除颤器联合治疗:可行性、安全性及性能
Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1740-1747. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv457. Epub 2016 Mar 3.