Mattei Eugenio, Censi Federica, Calcagnini Giovanni
Italian National Institute of Health, Department of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases and Aging, Rome, Italy.
Health Phys. 2021 Mar 1;120(3):344-349. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001332.
In 2017, the Italian National Institute of Health conducted a study to evaluate the potential risks of Conducted Electrical Weapons (CEW, AKA "stun guns") for users bearing a pacemaker (PM) or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The study addressed two specific models of stun guns: the TASER model X2 and AXON model X26P. In 2019, the same experimental protocol and testing procedure was adopted to evaluate the risk for another model of stun gun, the MAGEN model 5 (MAGEN, Israel). The MAGEN 5 differs from the previous stun guns tested in terms of peak voltage generated, duration of the shock, and trigger modality for repeated shocks. This note is an update of the previous study results, including the measurements on the MAGEN 5 stun gun. Despite the differences between the stun gun models, the effects on the PM/ICD behavior were the same as previously observed for the TASER stun guns.
2017年，意大利国家卫生研究院开展了一项研究，以评估电击武器（CEW，又称“眩晕枪”）对佩戴起搏器（PM）或植入式心脏复律除颤器（ICD）的使用者的潜在风险。该研究涉及两种特定型号的眩晕枪：泰瑟X2型和Axon X26P型。2019年，采用相同的实验方案和测试程序来评估另一种型号眩晕枪——Magen 5型（以色列Magen公司）的风险。Magen 5型与之前测试的眩晕枪在产生的峰值电压、电击持续时间以及重复电击的触发方式方面有所不同。本报告是之前研究结果的更新，包括对Magen 5型眩晕枪的测量。尽管眩晕枪型号不同，但对PM/ICD行为的影响与之前观察到的泰瑟眩晕枪的影响相同。
