From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):884e-891e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004987.
For children with cleft lip and/or palate, access to care is vital for optimizing speech, appearance, and psychosocial outcomes. The authors posited that inadequate access to care negatively impacts outcomes in this population.
Sixty caregivers of children with cleft lip and palate were surveyed to assess perceived barriers using the validated Barriers to Care questionnaire. The questionnaire includes 39 items divided into five subscales, with higher scores indicating fewer barriers. Caregiver-reported outcomes were assessed using the Cleft Evaluation Profile, which captures cleft-specific appearance- and speech-related outcomes. Higher scores correspond to less satisfactory outcomes. Desire for revision surgery was assessed as a binary outcome among caregivers. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the relationship of barriers to care, caregiver-reported outcomes, and desire for revision, adjusting for clinical and demographic covariates.
Sixty percent of caregivers perceived barriers to care, and caregivers who reported poorer access to care described poorer cleft-related outcomes (r = 0.19, p = 0.024). Caregivers with poorer skills (r = 0.17, p = 0.037), expectations (r = 0.17, p = 0.045), and pragmatics (r = 0.18, p = 0.026) subscale scores were associated with worse Cleft Evaluation Profile scores. Barriers were also negatively associated with aesthetic item scores (r = 0.11, p = 0.025). Finally, caregivers reporting fewer barriers were 21.2 percent less likely to express interest in revision surgery.
Barriers to care were associated with poorer appearance-related outcomes and increased interest in revision among caregivers of cleft patients. Enhancing access to care is critical in order to effectively meet goals of care for these families.
对于唇腭裂儿童来说,获得治疗至关重要,这对于优化其语音、外貌和心理社会结果具有重要意义。作者推测,获得治疗的机会不足会对该人群的结果产生负面影响。
对 60 名唇腭裂儿童的照顾者进行了调查,以使用经过验证的《护理障碍问卷》评估其感知障碍。该问卷包含 39 个项目,分为 5 个分量表,分数越高表示障碍越少。使用《唇裂评估量表》评估照顾者报告的结果,该量表可捕捉唇裂特有的外貌和语音相关结果。分数越高表示结果越不令人满意。将照顾者的修正手术需求评估为二元结果。采用多变量回归分析评估护理障碍、照顾者报告的结果和修正手术需求之间的关系,调整了临床和人口统计学协变量。
60%的照顾者认为存在治疗障碍,而那些报告治疗机会较差的照顾者描述的唇裂相关结果较差(r = 0.19,p = 0.024)。技能(r = 0.17,p = 0.037)、期望(r = 0.17,p = 0.045)和语用学(r = 0.18,p = 0.026)分量表评分较差的照顾者与较差的《唇裂评估量表》评分相关。障碍也与美学项目评分呈负相关(r = 0.11,p = 0.025)。最后,报告障碍较少的照顾者对修正手术的兴趣减少了 21.2%。
治疗障碍与照顾者对唇裂患者外貌相关结果的不满和对修正手术的兴趣增加有关。为了有效满足这些家庭的治疗目标,增加治疗机会至关重要。