Bakke S J, Nakstad P H, Aakhus T
Department of Radiology, Rikshospitalet, University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eur J Radiol. 1988 Aug;8(3):140-4.
A study of the diagnostic utility of both intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV-DSA) and conventional angiography of precerebral and cerebral arteries is presented. The series comprised 60 patients with TIA, who underwent the two procedures with a mean interval of 16 days. Conventional angiography was generally superior to IV-DSA, and this was particularly marked in the siphons and cerebral arteries. Only the excellent IV-DSA examinations obtained in a few patients with TIA could be accepted as final pre-operative procedures. Accurate imaging of the lesions and collateral flow pattern usually required intra-arterial injections, and intra-arterial DSA is now usually preferred.
本文介绍了一项关于静脉数字减影血管造影(IV-DSA)以及脑前和脑动脉传统血管造影诊断效用的研究。该系列研究纳入了60例短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者,他们接受了这两种检查,平均间隔时间为16天。传统血管造影通常优于IV-DSA,在虹吸部和脑动脉中这一点尤为明显。只有少数TIA患者获得的优质IV-DSA检查结果可被接受作为最终术前检查。病变和侧支血流模式的精确成像通常需要动脉内注射,目前动脉内DSA通常更受青睐。