Runyon B A, Canawati H N, Akriviadis E A
Liver Unit, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles.
Gastroenterology. 1988 Nov;95(5):1351-5. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(88)90372-1.
The conventional method of ascitic fluid culture detects bacteria in only 42%-65% of patients who have neutrocytic ascites and suspected spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. In this study ascitic fluid was cultured by the conventional method as well as by a new method consisting of bedside inoculation of blood culture bottles with ascites. The conventional cultures grew bacteria in only 13 (43%) of 30 episodes of neutrocytic ascites, whereas the blood culture bottles grew bacteria in 28 (93%); this difference was significant (p less than 0.0001). The blood culture bottle method also resulted in more rapid detection of bacterial growth. The median concentration of bacteria in infected ascites was one organism per milliliter. Bedside inoculation of blood culture bottles with ascitic fluid is more sensitive than the conventional method in detecting bacterial peritonitis. The insensitivity of the conventional method is probably due to the low concentration of bacteria in infected ascites and the small volume of ascites cultured by this method.
传统的腹水培养方法仅能在42%-65%有中性粒细胞性腹水且怀疑自发性细菌性腹膜炎的患者中检测到细菌。在本研究中,腹水采用传统方法以及一种新方法进行培养,新方法是在床边将腹水接种到血培养瓶中。传统培养法在30例中性粒细胞性腹水病例中仅13例(43%)培养出细菌,而血培养瓶法有28例(93%)培养出细菌;这种差异具有显著性(p<0.0001)。血培养瓶法还能更快地检测到细菌生长。感染腹水中细菌的中位浓度为每毫升一个菌落。床边将腹水接种到血培养瓶中在检测细菌性腹膜炎方面比传统方法更敏感。传统方法的不敏感性可能是由于感染腹水中细菌浓度低以及该方法培养的腹水体积小。