• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Rigor in health-related research: toward an expanded conceptualization.

作者信息

Ratcliffe J W, Gonzalez-del-Valle A

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1988;18(3):361-92. doi: 10.2190/E6E5-R0TP-PB1C-V4PK.

DOI:10.2190/E6E5-R0TP-PB1C-V4PK
PMID:3049406
Abstract

When the research process is viewed not merely as a set of methods for data collection and analysis but, instead, as an integrated series of arbitrary choices made by the researcher, it quickly becomes apparent that the prevailing conceptualization of rigor is much too narrow; indeed, the way rigor is currently conceptualized may well be responsible for the many errors that are commonly made in the research process. An expanded conceptualization of rigor is presented, and its implications for research into some critical health issues are discussed in some detail.

摘要

相似文献

1
Rigor in health-related research: toward an expanded conceptualization.
Int J Health Serv. 1988;18(3):361-92. doi: 10.2190/E6E5-R0TP-PB1C-V4PK.
2
It is time to revise the Cochrane criteria.是时候修订Cochrane标准了。
Qual Health Res. 2006 Mar;16(3):315-7. doi: 10.1177/1049732305285495.
3
Mixing qualitative methods: quality assurance or qualitative quagmire?混合定性方法:质量保证还是定性困境?
Qual Health Res. 1998 May;8(3):352-61. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800306.
4
Health services utilization among older adults: conceptual, measurement, and modeling issues in secondary analysis.老年人的医疗服务利用:二次分析中的概念、测量与建模问题
Gerontologist. 1994 Aug;34(4):470-5. doi: 10.1093/geront/34.4.470.
5
Why we know so little about prenatal care nationwide: an assessment of required methodology.为何我们对全国范围内的产前护理知之甚少:所需方法的评估。
Health Serv Res. 1988 Aug;23(3):359-80.
6
Challenges in measuring patient outcomes.测量患者预后的挑战。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;32(3):495-512.
7
Toward a culture of qualitative thinking in health services research.迈向卫生服务研究中的质性思维文化。
Med Care Res Rev. 2011 Feb;68(1):49-55. doi: 10.1177/1077558710383431. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
8
Development of a quality-of-life rating scale for use in health-care evaluation.
Eval Health Prof. 1987 Jun;10(2):186-200. doi: 10.1177/016327878701000203.
9
Hypothesis: the research page. Participatory methods to facilitate research.假设:研究页面。促进研究的参与式方法。
Can Fam Physician. 2002 Mar;48:548-9, 553-4.
10
Comparing outcomes: comparing systems.
Med Care. 1999 Jun;37(6):527-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199906000-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dialogic Health Systems Research Framework (DHSRF): A tool for facilitating self-criticality, researcher interactions and knowledge management in Health Systems Research & Policy Studies.对话式卫生系统研究框架(DHSRF):一种促进卫生系统研究与政策研究中的自我批判性、研究者互动及知识管理的工具。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Sep 19;5(9):e0004209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004209. eCollection 2025.
2
Has National Medical Commission Short-Changed the Subject of Community Medicine in Its Latest Minimum Requirements for Indian Medical Graduates? A Systems Review.国家医学委员会在其最新的印度医学毕业生最低要求中是否亏待了社区医学学科?一项系统评价。
Indian J Community Med. 2021 Oct-Dec;46(4):587-591. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_112_21. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
3
Biomedical waste disposal: A systems analysis.生物医学废物处理:系统分析
Med J Armed Forces India. 2013 Oct;69(4):351-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
4
Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations.医疗保健质性研究的评价标准:争议与建议。
Ann Fam Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;6(4):331-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.818.
5
Methodological, practical, and ethical challenges to inner-city health research.市中心区健康研究面临的方法学、实践和伦理挑战。
J Urban Health. 2002 Dec;79(4 Suppl 1):S35-42. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.suppl_1.s35.
6
The CARE-CDC health initiative: a model for global participatory research.CARE-美国疾病控制与预防中心健康倡议:全球参与性研究的一个典范
Am J Public Health. 2001 Oct;91(10):1549-52. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.10.1549.
7
Closing the gap, opening the process: why study social contributors to preterm delivery among black women.缩小差距,开启进程:为何要研究黑人女性早产的社会影响因素
Matern Child Health J. 2001 Jun;5(2):71-4. doi: 10.1023/a:1011392830732.
8
[Study of parental participation in curricular and extracurricular activities].[家长参与课程和课外活动的研究]
Can J Public Health. 1997 May-Jun;88(3):184-91. doi: 10.1007/BF03403885.