Nettesheim Neal, Powell Doug, Vasios William, Mbuthia Jennifer, Davis Konrad, Yourk Dan, Waibel Kirk, Kral Daniel, McVeigh Francis, Pamplin Jeremy C
Department of Emergency Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA.
3rd Special Forces Group (Airborne), Fort Bragg, NC.
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e462-e470. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy127.
U.S. military forces have engaged in combat in mature areas of operations (AOs) in Iraq and Afghanistan that allow for casualty evacuation to definitive surgical care within "The Golden Hour." Future combat casualty care will be complex and challenging. Facing the medical demand of the Multi-Domain Battlefield remains an uncertain problem set. What can be anticipated is that a near peer adversary will not allow freedom of movement, air superiority, or uninterrupted communications. Telemedicine is one solution that can aid in this environment because it can reduce the medical footprint in a theater of operation by bringing the remote expert's knowledge and experience to the point of need.
Telemedicine can augment the capabilities of caregivers in austere, operational settings using synchronous or asynchronous technology to optimize the care of casualties who are delayed in evacuation to higher levels of care. These technologies have been implemented and tested over the past 30 yr. We reviewed the historical literature about military telemedicine and assembled current leaders in military telemedicine to write this review.
This manuscript reviews the history of and current capabilities of military telemedicine.
Broad implementation of telemedicine in the operational setting is challenged by network limitations and cyber security concerns. Reliable, high bandwidth, low latency, secure communications that is necessary for advanced telemedicine capabilities (i.e., procedural telementoring) will not likely be available at all times during future engagements. The military must develop and train a full spectrum of telemedical support options that include low-to-high bandwidth solutions. Telemedicine is not a substitute for deploying anticipated medical resources or optimizing training: telemedicine is plan B where plan A is training, deployment, and casualty evacuation. Nevertheless, when network and communications resources are sufficient, telemedicine brings advanced expertise to austere, resource-limited contexts when timely evacuation is not possible.
美国军队在伊拉克和阿富汗的成熟作战区域参与了战斗,这些区域具备在“黄金一小时”内将伤员疏散至确定性外科治疗机构的条件。未来的战斗伤员护理将复杂且具有挑战性。应对多域战场的医疗需求仍是一个不确定的问题集。可以预见的是,近乎同等水平的对手不会允许行动自由、空中优势或不间断通信。远程医疗是一种可在这种环境中提供帮助的解决方案,因为它可以通过将远程专家的知识和经验带到需求点,减少作战区域的医疗足迹。
远程医疗可利用同步或异步技术增强在严峻作战环境中护理人员的能力,以优化那些在疏散至更高护理级别时被延误的伤员的护理。这些技术在过去30年中已得到应用和测试。我们回顾了有关军事远程医疗的历史文献,并召集了军事远程医疗领域的现任领军人物撰写本综述。
本手稿回顾了军事远程医疗的历史和当前能力。
远程医疗在作战环境中的广泛应用受到网络限制和网络安全问题的挑战。先进远程医疗能力(即程序性远程指导)所需的可靠、高带宽、低延迟、安全通信在未来作战期间不太可能随时可用。军队必须开发并培训包括低到高带宽解决方案在内的全谱远程医疗支持选项。远程医疗并非部署预期医疗资源或优化培训的替代品:远程医疗是在A计划为培训、部署和伤员疏散的情况下的B计划。然而,当网络和通信资源充足时,在无法及时疏散的情况下,远程医疗可将先进专业知识带到严峻、资源有限的环境中。