Stanley Claire, Baillargeon Amanda, Selk Amanda
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019 Jan;48(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of women during pregnancy and the postpartum period related to placentophagy.
Mixed methods study (cross-sectional survey and online discussions).
We used social media to advertise the study to mother/parenting groups. Online discussion groups were conducted through Google Groups.
Women during pregnancy and in the postpartum period and placenta encapsulation specialists with Internet access.
We summarized descriptive data and analyzed subgroups with the use of chi-square tests. We conducted a binary logistic regression to compare placentophagy with demographic variables and used constant comparative analysis to analyze online discussion group themes.
Overall, 271 of 1,088 (24.9%) respondents consumed their placentas. Canadian respondents and those who experienced pregnancy/birth-related complications were significantly (p < .05) less likely to consume their placentas than respondents from the United States (odds ratio = 0.48, 95% confidence interval [0.28, 0.82]) and those who had no complications (odds ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [0.37, 0.85]). Increased iron stores (521/1,030, 50.6%), prevention of postpartum depression (519/1,030, 50.4%), and increased energy/decreased fatigue (460/1,030, 44.7%) were the most commonly listed perceived benefits. Infection and improper handling/preparation of the placenta were important concerns, and hospital policy was noted as a barrier to placentophagy.
Respondents who engaged in placentophagy were primarily motivated by unproven benefits, such as the prevention of postpartum depression and anemia, for which there are other management alternatives. Although placentophagy is gaining popularity, it remains unregulated, and safety and efficacy data are limited. A safe, standardized preparation process is needed to minimize potential harm before further efficacy studies can be done. Targeted educational material surrounding placentophagy is needed to improve woman-centered care.
评估孕期及产后女性对胎盘食疗法的认知、态度和信念。
混合方法研究(横断面调查和在线讨论)。
我们利用社交媒体向母亲/育儿群体宣传该研究。在线讨论组通过谷歌群组进行。
孕期及产后女性以及可上网的胎盘封装专家。
我们汇总描述性数据,并使用卡方检验分析亚组。我们进行二元逻辑回归以比较胎盘食疗法与人口统计学变量,并使用持续比较分析来分析在线讨论组的主题。
总体而言,1088名受访者中有271名(24.9%)食用了自己的胎盘。加拿大受访者以及经历过与怀孕/分娩相关并发症的受访者比美国受访者(优势比 = 0.48,95%置信区间[0.28, 0.82])和未出现并发症的受访者(优势比 = 0.56,95%置信区间[0.37, 0.85])食用胎盘的可能性显著降低(p < 0.05)。铁储备增加(521/1030,50.6%)、预防产后抑郁(519/1030,50.4%)以及精力增加/疲劳减轻(460/1030,44.7%)是最常被提及的感知益处。感染以及胎盘处理/制备不当是重要问题,医院政策被视为胎盘食疗法的一个障碍。
采用胎盘食疗法的受访者主要动机是一些未经证实的益处,如预防产后抑郁和贫血,而针对这些情况有其他管理方法。尽管胎盘食疗法越来越流行,但它仍未得到规范,安全性和有效性数据有限。在进行进一步的疗效研究之前,需要一个安全、标准化的制备过程以尽量减少潜在危害。需要有针对性的关于胎盘食疗法的教育材料来改善以女性为中心的护理。