Suppr超能文献

人类和非人类哺乳动物食用胎盘:有益和不良影响

Consumption of Maternal Placenta in Humans and Nonhuman Mammals: Beneficial and Adverse Effects.

作者信息

Mota-Rojas Daniel, Orihuela Agustín, Strappini Ana, Villanueva-García Dina, Napolitano Fabio, Mora-Medina Patricia, Barrios-García Hugo B, Herrera Yuridia, Lavalle Eunice, Martínez-Burnes Julio

机构信息

Neurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), 04960 Mexico City, Mexico.

Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, 62209 Morelos, Mexico.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 15;10(12):2398. doi: 10.3390/ani10122398.

Abstract

Placentophagia is a common mammalian behavior, and the first scientific study of the potential effects of human maternal placentophagia on lactation was in 1917. More recently, in the 1970s, human placentophagia was reported in North America with a trend toward increased consumption. There are different hypotheses about the women and nonhuman mammals' motivation towards placentophagia, but few have been subject to hypotheses testing. In women, the controversy continues; on the one hand, researchers attribute benefits like increased breast milk, weight gain in newborns, decreased postpartum depression and fatigue, and improved mothers' mood. In contrast, bacterial or viral infections, hormonal, or trace elements that could become toxic for both the mother and baby are reported as possible health risks. Other reports argue a lack of scientific rigor to support the self-reported benefits of placentophagia. Also, the way the placenta is prepared (raw, cooked, dehydrated, processed, or encapsulated) alters its components, and thus the desired effects. This review provides relevant information and the different hypotheses and points of view around placentophagia. However, there are still questions to be resolved, and more studies are needed to confirm or reject the data generated so far about placentophagia in humans and nonhuman mammals.

摘要

食胎盘是一种常见的哺乳动物行为,对人类产妇食胎盘对泌乳潜在影响的首次科学研究是在1917年。最近,在20世纪70年代,北美报道了人类食胎盘现象,且有食用量增加的趋势。关于女性和非人类哺乳动物食胎盘的动机有不同的假设,但很少有经过假设检验的。在女性中,争议仍在继续;一方面,研究人员认为食胎盘有诸多益处,如增加母乳分泌、新生儿体重增加、产后抑郁和疲劳减轻以及母亲情绪改善。相反,细菌或病毒感染、激素或可能对母婴都有毒性的微量元素被报道为可能的健康风险。其他报告认为缺乏科学严谨性来支持食胎盘自我报告的益处。此外,胎盘的制备方式(生、熟、脱水、加工或制成胶囊)会改变其成分,从而影响预期效果。本综述提供了有关食胎盘的相关信息以及不同的假设和观点。然而,仍有问题有待解决,需要更多研究来证实或否定目前关于人类和非人类哺乳动物食胎盘所产生的数据。

相似文献

2
Placentophagia and the Tao of POEF.食胎与 POEF 之道。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Feb;145:104992. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104992. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
3
A Literature Review on the Practice of Placentophagia.关于胎盘食性实践的文献综述
Nurs Womens Health. 2016 Oct-Nov;20(5):476-483. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2016.08.005.
5
Placentophagy: therapeutic miracle or myth?胎盘食疗法:治疗奇迹还是无稽之谈?
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015 Oct;18(5):673-80. doi: 10.1007/s00737-015-0538-8. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
6
Human placentophagy: a review.人类食胎盘:综述。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;218(4):401.e1-401.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

4
Non-human primate birth and human birth.非人灵长类动物的分娩与人类的分娩。
Primates. 2023 Nov;64(6):551-556. doi: 10.1007/s10329-023-01097-2. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
7
Vicissitudes in the Placental Cotyledon Number in a Singleton Pregnancy with Gestational Diabetes.妊娠期糖尿病单胎妊娠胎盘小叶数量的变化
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2022 Jan-Mar;12(1):24-29. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_230_21. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
The placenta as a target of opioid drugs†.胎盘作为阿片类药物的靶标†。
Biol Reprod. 2022 Apr 26;106(4):676-686. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioac003.

本文引用的文献

2
No. 378-Placentophagy.第378号——食胎盘行为。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 May;41(5):679-682. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.10.006.
4
Understanding Placentophagy.了解胎盘食性。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019 Jan;48(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
Whelping and Dystocia: Maximizing Success of Medical Management.分娩与难产:最大化医疗处理的成功率
Top Companion Anim Med. 2018 Mar;33(1):12-16. doi: 10.1053/j.tcam.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
10
Placentophagia: Revolution in Postpartum Medicine, or Just a Trend?食胎盘行为:产后医学的变革,还是仅仅是一种潮流?
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Mar;40(3):286. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验