• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Quantitative Clinical Decision-Support Strategy Identifying Which Patients With Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer May Benefit the Most From Proton Radiation Therapy.一种定量临床决策支持策略,用于确定哪些口咽头颈部癌症患者可能从质子放射治疗中获益最大。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 1;104(3):540-552. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.039. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
2
Individualized quality of life benefit and cost-effectiveness estimates of proton therapy for patients with oropharyngeal cancer.质子治疗口咽癌患者的个体化生活质量获益和成本效益估计。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan 21;16(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01745-1.
3
A Model-Based Approach to Predict Short-Term Toxicity Benefits With Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer.基于模型的方法预测质子治疗口咽癌的短期毒性获益。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 1;104(3):553-562. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.055. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
4
Protons in head-and-neck cancer: bridging the gap of evidence.头颈部癌症中的质子治疗:填补证据空白。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Apr 1;85(5):1282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.11.006. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
5
Patient-specific bolus for range shifter air gap reduction in intensity-modulated proton therapy of head-and-neck cancer studied with Monte Carlo based plan optimization.基于蒙特卡罗的计划优化研究头颈部癌症调强质子治疗中用于减小射程漂移器气隙的个体化推注剂量。
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jul;128(1):161-166. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
6
The price of robustness; impact of worst-case optimization on organ-at-risk dose and complication probability in intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients.稳健性的代价;最坏情况优化对调强质子治疗口咽癌患者危及器官剂量和并发症概率的影响。
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jul;120(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.038. Epub 2016 May 10.
7
Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.点扫描质子弧形治疗可降低口咽癌患者的毒性。
Med Phys. 2023 Mar;50(3):1305-1317. doi: 10.1002/mp.16098. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
8
NTCP reduction for advanced head and neck cancer patients using proton therapy for complete or sequential boost treatment versus photon therapy.对于晚期头颈癌患者,使用质子治疗进行完整或序贯增敏治疗与光子治疗相比时的正常组织并发症概率降低情况。
Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1658-64. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1071920. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
9
Clinical outcome after pencil beam scanning proton therapy and dysphagia/xerostomia NTCP calculations of proton and photon radiotherapy delivered to patients with cancer of the major salivary glands.大涎腺癌质子和光子调强放疗的铅笔束扫描质子治疗和吞咽困难/口干 NTCP 计算的临床结果。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Aug;96(1148):20220672. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220672. Epub 2023 May 2.
10
Impact of model and dose uncertainty on model-based selection of oropharyngeal cancer patients for proton therapy.模型和剂量不确定性对基于模型选择口咽癌患者进行质子治疗的影响。
Acta Oncol. 2017 Nov;56(11):1444-1450. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1355113. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.口咽鳞状细胞癌的质子束放射治疗
Int J Part Ther. 2023 Apr 27;9(4):243-252. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-22-00030.1. eCollection 2023 Spring.
2
Redefine the Role of Proton Beam Therapy for the Locally-Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Assisting the Reduction of Acute Hematologic Toxicity.重新定义质子束治疗在局部晚期非小细胞肺癌中的作用,以协助降低急性血液学毒性。
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 30;12:812031. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.812031. eCollection 2022.
3
Proton Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Early Clinical Experience and Current Challenges.头颈部鳞状细胞癌的质子治疗:早期临床经验与当前挑战
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 24;14(11):2587. doi: 10.3390/cancers14112587.
4
Predictive performance of different NTCP techniques for radiation-induced esophagitis in NSCLC patients receiving proton radiotherapy.不同 NTCP 技术预测 NSCLC 患者接受质子放疗后放射性食管炎的预测性能。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 2;12(1):9178. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12898-8.
5
Proton Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients: Dosimetric and NTCP Evaluation Supporting Clinical Decision.鼻咽癌患者的质子放射治疗:支持临床决策的剂量学和正常组织并发症概率评估
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 22;14(5):1109. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051109.
6
Investigate the Dosimetric and Potential Clinical Benefits Utilizing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Comparison Between Photon and Proton Beam Therapy.利用立体定向体部放射治疗联合同步整合加量技术治疗局部晚期胰腺癌的剂量学及潜在临床获益研究:光子束与质子束治疗的比较
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 22;11:747532. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.747532. eCollection 2021.
7
A scoping review of patient selection methods for proton therapy.质子治疗患者选择方法的范围综述。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2022 Mar;69(1):108-121. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.540. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
8
Optimizing oropharyngeal cancer management by using proton beam therapy: trends of cost-effectiveness.利用质子束疗法优化口咽癌治疗:成本效益趋势
BMC Cancer. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08638-2.
9
Development and Implementation of Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Challenges and Perspectives.霍奇金淋巴瘤质子治疗的发展与实施:挑战与展望
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 26;13(15):3744. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153744.
10
Cost-Effectiveness Models of Proton Therapy for Head and Neck: Evaluating Quality and Methods to Date.头颈部质子治疗的成本效益模型:评估当前的质量和方法。
Int J Part Ther. 2021 Jun 25;8(1):339-353. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00058.1. eCollection 2021 Summer.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic Review of Normal Tissue Complication Models Relevant to Standard Fractionation Radiation Therapy of the Head and Neck Region Published After the QUANTEC Reports.基于 QUANTEC 报告发布之后的头颈部标准分割放射治疗相关正常组织并发症模型的系统评价
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Feb 1;100(2):391-407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.041. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
2
Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers.质子治疗头颈部癌症。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jan;28(1):53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.08.004.
3
Development and Validation of Nomograms Predictive of Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer.口咽癌患者总生存和无进展生存预测列线图的开发与验证
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 20;35(36):4057-4065. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0748. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
4
Contribution of submandibular gland and swallowing structure sparing to post-radiation therapy PEG dependence in oropharynx cancer patients treated with split-neck IMRT technique.下颌下腺及吞咽结构保留对采用分颈调强放疗技术治疗的口咽癌患者放疗后经皮内镜下胃造口术依赖的影响
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Nov 15;11(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0726-3.
5
Toward a model-based patient selection strategy for proton therapy: External validation of photon-derived normal tissue complication probability models in a head and neck proton therapy cohort.迈向基于模型的质子治疗患者选择策略:头颈部质子治疗队列中光子衍生的正常组织并发症概率模型的外部验证。
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Dec;121(3):381-386. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.022. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
6
Strategy of Using Intratreatment Hypoxia Imaging to Selectively and Safely Guide Radiation Dose De-escalation Concurrent With Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.采用治疗期间缺氧成像技术选择性且安全地指导局部晚期人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽癌同步放化疗中放射剂量降低的策略
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Sep 1;96(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.04.027. Epub 2016 May 7.
7
Intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for patients with oropharynx cancer - A case matched analysis.口咽癌患者的调强质子束治疗(IMPT)与调强光子治疗(IMRT)——病例匹配分析
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jul;120(1):48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.022. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
8
Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modelling using spatial dose metrics and machine learning methods for severe acute oral mucositis resulting from head and neck radiotherapy.使用空间剂量指标和机器学习方法对头部和颈部放疗导致的严重急性口腔黏膜炎进行正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)建模。
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jul;120(1):21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 27.
9
Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Disease Recurrence After Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma.口咽鳞状细胞癌调强质子治疗后的临床结果及疾病复发模式
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):360-367. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Quality of Life and Value Considerations in Head and Neck Proton Beam Therapy: The Holy Grail at Last, or the Quest Continues?头颈部质子束治疗中的生活质量与价值考量:终得圣杯,还是仍在探索?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):40-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.12.378.

一种定量临床决策支持策略,用于确定哪些口咽头颈部癌症患者可能从质子放射治疗中获益最大。

A Quantitative Clinical Decision-Support Strategy Identifying Which Patients With Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer May Benefit the Most From Proton Radiation Therapy.

机构信息

Institute for Onco-Physics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.

Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 1;104(3):540-552. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.039. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.039
PMID:30496877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8171291/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Developing a quantitative decision-support strategy estimating the impact of normal tissue complications from definitive radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). We developed this strategy to identify patients with oropharyngeal HNC who may benefit most from receiving proton RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Recent normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for dysphagia, esophagitis, hypothyroidism, xerostomia, and oral mucositis were used to estimate NTCP for 33 patients with oropharyngeal HNC previously treated with photon intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Comparative proton therapy plans were generated using clinical protocols for HNC RT at a collaborating proton center. Organ-at-risk (OAR) doses from photon and proton RT plans were used to calculate NTCPs; Monte Carlo sampling 10,000 times was used for each patient to account for model parameter uncertainty. The latency and duration of each complication were modeled from calculated NTCP, accounting for age-, sex-, smoking- and p16-specific conditional survival probability. Complications were then assigned quality-adjustment factors based on severity to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost from each complication.

RESULTS

Based on our institutional-delivered photon IMRT doses and the achievable proton therapy doses, the average QALY reduction from all HNC RT complications for photon and proton therapy was 1.52 QALYs versus 1.15 QALYs, with proton therapy sparing 0.37 QALYs on average (composite 95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.53 QALYs). Long-term complications (dysphagia and xerostomia) contributed most to the QALY reduction. The QALYs spared with proton RT varied considerably among patients, ranging from 0.06 to 0.84 QALYs. Younger patients with p16-positive tumors who smoked ≤10 pack-years may benefit most from proton therapy, although this finding should be validated using larger patient series. A sensitivity analysis reducing photon IMRT doses to all OARs by 20% resulted in no overall estimated benefit with proton therapy with -0.02 QALYs spared, although some patients still had an estimated benefit in this scenario, ranging from -0.50 to 0.43 QALYs spared.

CONCLUSIONS

This quantitative decision-support strategy allowed us to identify patients with oropharyngeal cancer who might benefit the most from proton RT, although the estimated benefit of proton therapy ultimately depends on the OAR doses achievable with modern photon IMRT solutions. These results can help radiation oncologists and proton therapy centers optimize resource allocation and improve quality of life for patients with HNC.

摘要

目的

开发一种定量决策支持策略,以估计头颈部癌症(HNC)根治性放疗(RT)引起的正常组织并发症的影响。我们开发了这种策略,以确定接受质子放疗可能获益最大的口咽 HNC 患者。

方法与材料

使用最近的吞咽困难、食管炎、甲状腺功能减退、口干和口腔粘膜炎的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)模型,估算 33 例接受光子调强放疗(IMRT)治疗的口咽 HNC 患者的 NTCP。使用合作质子中心的 HNC RT 临床方案生成质子治疗计划。使用光子和质子 RT 计划的危及器官(OAR)剂量计算 NTCP;对每位患者进行 10,000 次蒙特卡罗抽样,以考虑模型参数不确定性。根据计算的 NTCP 对每种并发症的潜伏期和持续时间进行建模,同时考虑年龄、性别、吸烟和 p16 特异性条件生存概率。然后根据严重程度为并发症分配质量调整因素,以计算每种并发症导致的质量调整生命年(QALY)损失。

结果

根据我们机构提供的光子 IMRT 剂量和可实现的质子治疗剂量,光子和质子治疗引起的所有 HNC RT 并发症导致的平均 QALY 减少量为 1.52 QALY 与 1.15 QALY,质子治疗平均节省 0.37 QALY(复合 95%置信区间,0.27-2.53 QALY)。长期并发症(吞咽困难和口干)对 QALY 减少的贡献最大。质子治疗节省的 QALY 在患者之间差异很大,范围为 0.06 至 0.84 QALY。p16 阳性肿瘤且吸烟量≤10 包年的年轻患者可能从质子治疗中获益最大,尽管这一发现需要使用更大的患者系列进行验证。一项敏感性分析将所有 OAR 的光子 IMRT 剂量降低 20%,结果显示质子治疗无总体获益,节省了-0.02 QALY,尽管在这种情况下,一些患者仍有估计的获益,范围为-0.50 至 0.43 QALY。

结论

这种定量决策支持策略使我们能够识别出口咽癌患者,他们可能从质子放疗中获益最大,尽管质子治疗的估计获益最终取决于现代光子调强放疗解决方案所能达到的 OAR 剂量。这些结果可以帮助放射肿瘤学家和质子治疗中心优化资源分配,并提高 HNC 患者的生活质量。