• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

稳健性的代价;最坏情况优化对调强质子治疗口咽癌患者危及器官剂量和并发症概率的影响。

The price of robustness; impact of worst-case optimization on organ-at-risk dose and complication probability in intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients.

机构信息

Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Section Radiation Detection and Medical Imaging, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jul;120(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.038. Epub 2016 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.038
PMID:27178142
Abstract

PURPOSE

To quantify the impact of the degree of robustness against setup errors and range errors on organ-at-risk (OAR) dose and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) in intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For 20 oropharyngeal cases (10 unilateral and 10 bilateral), robust treatment plans were generated using 'minimax' worst-case optimization. We varied the robustness against setup errors ('setup robustness') from 1 to 7mm and the robustness against range errors ('range robustness') from 1% to 7% (+1mm). We evaluated OAR doses and NTCP-values for xerostomia, dysphagia and larynx edema.

RESULTS

Varying the degree of setup robustness was found to have a considerably larger impact than varying the range robustness. Increasing setup robustness from 1mm to 3, 5, and 7mm resulted in average NTCP-values to increase by 1.9, 4.4 and 7.5 percentage point, whereas they increased by only 0.4, 0.8 and 1.2 percentage point when increasing range robustness from 1% to 3%, 5% and 7%. The degree of setup robustness was observed to have a clinically significant impact in bilateral cases in particular.

CONCLUSIONS

For oropharyngeal cancer patients, minimizing setup errors should be given a higher priority than minimizing range errors.

摘要

目的

量化在针对口咽癌患者的调强质子治疗中,针对摆位误差和射程误差的稳健程度对危及器官(OAR)剂量和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)的影响。

材料与方法

针对 20 例口咽癌病例(10 例单侧,10 例双侧),使用“最小最大”最坏情况优化生成稳健的治疗计划。我们将针对摆位误差的稳健程度(“摆位稳健性”)从 1mm 变化到 7mm,将针对射程误差的稳健程度(“射程稳健性”)从 1%变化到 7%(+1mm)。我们评估了口干、吞咽困难和喉水肿的 OAR 剂量和 NTCP 值。

结果

与改变射程稳健性相比,改变摆位稳健性对结果的影响要大得多。将摆位稳健性从 1mm 增加到 3mm、5mm 和 7mm,平均 NTCP 值分别增加 1.9、4.4 和 7.5 个百分点,而将射程稳健性从 1%增加到 3%、5%和 7%时,平均 NTCP 值仅分别增加 0.4、0.8 和 1.2 个百分点。在双侧病例中,摆位稳健性的程度观察到具有显著的临床影响。

结论

对于口咽癌患者,应优先考虑最小化摆位误差,而不是最小化射程误差。

相似文献

1
The price of robustness; impact of worst-case optimization on organ-at-risk dose and complication probability in intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients.稳健性的代价;最坏情况优化对调强质子治疗口咽癌患者危及器官剂量和并发症概率的影响。
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jul;120(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.038. Epub 2016 May 10.
2
Impact of setup and range uncertainties on TCP and NTCP following VMAT or IMPT of oropharyngeal cancer patients.头颈部肿瘤 VMAT 或 IMPT 治疗中摆位和靶区范围不确定性对 TCP 和 NTCP 的影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Apr 23;64(9):095001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1459.
3
A Quantitative Clinical Decision-Support Strategy Identifying Which Patients With Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer May Benefit the Most From Proton Radiation Therapy.一种定量临床决策支持策略,用于确定哪些口咽头颈部癌症患者可能从质子放射治疗中获益最大。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 1;104(3):540-552. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.039. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
4
Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.多场优化在鼻咽癌铅笔束质子治疗中的稳健性优于单场优化:增强稳健性分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Nov 1;99(3):738-749. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Robustness Recipes for Minimax Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients.用于口咽癌患者调强质子治疗的最小最大鲁棒优化的鲁棒性方法。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.035. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.点扫描质子弧形治疗可降低口咽癌患者的毒性。
Med Phys. 2023 Mar;50(3):1305-1317. doi: 10.1002/mp.16098. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
Robust Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Increases Estimated Clinical Benefit in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.稳健的调强质子治疗(IMPT)增加了头颈癌患者的估计临床获益。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152477. eCollection 2016.
8
The impact of treatment accuracy on proton therapy patient selection for oropharyngeal cancer patients.治疗精度对口腔咽癌患者质子治疗选择的影响。
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Dec;125(3):520-525. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.028. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
9
Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.用于调强质子治疗剂量分布的“最坏情况剂量”和“极小极大”稳健优化的线性和非线性规划方法比较
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Mar;18(2):15-25. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12033. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
10
Evaluating the effect of setup uncertainty reduction and adaptation to geometric changes on normal tissue complication probability using online adaptive head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy.使用在线自适应头颈部强度调制质子治疗评估摆位不确定性降低和适应几何变化对正常组织并发症概率的影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2023 May 30;68(11):115018. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acd433.

引用本文的文献

1
A planning approach for online adaptive proton therapy to cope with cone beam computed tomography inaccuracies.一种用于应对锥束计算机断层扫描不准确问题的在线自适应质子治疗的规划方法。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Mar 20;34:100752. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100752. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Benefit of range uncertainty reduction in robust optimisation for proton therapy of brain, head-and-neck and breast cancer patients.减少范围不确定性在脑癌、头颈癌和乳腺癌患者质子治疗稳健优化中的益处。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug 21;31:100632. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100632. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
A review of the clinical introduction of 4D particle therapy research concepts.
4D粒子治疗研究概念的临床引入综述。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jan 10;29:100535. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100535. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Clinical benefit of range uncertainty reduction in proton treatment planning based on dual-energy CT for neuro-oncological patients.基于双能 CT 的神经肿瘤患者质子治疗计划中范围不确定性降低的临床获益。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Sep;96(1149):20230110. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20230110. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
5
A survey of practice patterns for adaptive particle therapy for interfractional changes.关于自适应粒子治疗分次间变化的实践模式调查。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023 Apr 28;26:100442. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100442. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
A hybrid multi-particle approach to range assessment-based treatment verification in particle therapy.一种基于范围评估的混合多粒子方法在粒子治疗中的治疗验证。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 25;13(1):6709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33777-w.
7
Evaluating the effect of setup uncertainty reduction and adaptation to geometric changes on normal tissue complication probability using online adaptive head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy.使用在线自适应头颈部强度调制质子治疗评估摆位不确定性降低和适应几何变化对正常组织并发症概率的影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2023 May 30;68(11):115018. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acd433.
8
Online adaptive planning methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.在线自适应调强放疗计划方法。
Phys Med Biol. 2023 May 11;68(10). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/accdb2.
9
IMPT of head and neck cancer: unsupervised machine learning treatment planning strategy for reducing radiation dermatitis.头颈部癌症的 IMPT:用于减少放射性皮炎的无监督机器学习治疗计划策略。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jan 14;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02201-y.
10
Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.小光斑与大光斑:在笔形束扫描质子治疗肺癌中对计划质量的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Feb;23(2):e13512. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13512. Epub 2022 Jan 6.