• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国老年男性样本中由于治疗率低导致骨质疏松症筛查效果有限。

Limited Osteoporosis Screening Effectiveness Due to Low Treatment Rates in a National Sample of Older Men.

机构信息

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Durham VA Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Durham, NC.

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Dec;93(12):1749-1759. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.06.024.

DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.06.024
PMID:30497697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6338211/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing for osteoporosis and subsequent fractures in US male veterans without a previous fracture.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a propensity score-matched observational study using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Veterans Affairs (VA) data from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2010, with a mean follow-up time of 4.7 years (range, 0-10 years). Men receiving VA primary care aged 65 to 99 years without a previous fracture (N=2,539,812) were included. Men undergoing DXA testing were propensity score matched with untested controls in a 1:3 ratio, indicating the probability of DXA testing within the next year. Time to first clinical fracture was the primary outcome. Comorbidities, demographic characteristics, medications, DXA results, and osteoporosis treatment were defined using administrative data and natural language processing. A landmark analysis contingent on surviving to 12 months after screening was completed, accounting for competing risk of mortality.

RESULTS

During follow-up of 153,311 men tested by DXA and 390,158 controls, 56,083 (10.3%) had sustained a fracture and 111,774 (20.6%) died. Overall, DXA testing was not associated with a decrease in fractures; conclusions are limited by unmeasured confounders and low medication initiation and adherence in those meeting treatment thresholds (12% of follow-up time). In contrast, DXA testing in prespecified subgroups was associated with a lower risk of fracture in comparison to the overall population who underwent DXA testing: androgen deprivation therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.89), glucocorticoids (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84), age 80 years and older (HR, 0.85; 0.81-0.90), 1 or more VA guideline risk factors (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.95), and high Fracture Risk Assessment Tool using body mass index score (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.95).

CONCLUSION

Current VA DXA testing practices are ineffective overall; interventions to improve treatment adherence are needed. Targeted DXA testing in higher-risk men was associated with a lower fracture risk.

摘要

目的

确定在美国无既往骨折的男性退伍军人中,双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)骨质疏松检测与随后骨折之间的关联。

患者和方法

这是一项使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心以及退伍军人事务部(VA)数据的倾向评分匹配观察性研究,从 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 12 月 31 日,平均随访时间为 4.7 年(范围,0-10 年)。纳入了年龄在 65 至 99 岁、无既往骨折(N=2539812)且接受 VA 初级保健的男性。对 DXA 检测者进行倾向评分匹配,以未检测者为对照,比例为 1:3,表明下一年进行 DXA 检测的可能性。首次临床骨折时间为主要结局。共病、人口统计学特征、药物、DXA 结果和骨质疏松症治疗均采用行政数据和自然语言处理进行定义。在完成筛选后 12 个月进行了基于生存的 landmark 分析,以考虑死亡的竞争风险。

结果

在对 153311 名接受 DXA 检测的男性和 390158 名对照者进行随访期间,有 56083 名(10.3%)发生了骨折,有 111774 名(20.6%)死亡。总体而言,DXA 检测并未降低骨折风险;由于存在无法测量的混杂因素以及在符合治疗阈值的患者中药物起始和依从性较低(占随访时间的 12%),结论受到限制。相比之下,在预先指定的亚组中,DXA 检测与接受 DXA 检测的总体人群相比,骨折风险较低:雄激素剥夺治疗(HR,0.77;95%CI,0.66-0.89)、糖皮质激素(HR,0.77;95%CI,0.72-0.84)、年龄 80 岁及以上(HR,0.85;0.81-0.90)、1 个或更多 VA 指南风险因素(HR,0.91;95%CI,0.87-0.95)和使用体重指数评分的高骨折风险评估工具(HR,0.90;95%CI,0.86-0.95)。

结论

目前 VA 的 DXA 检测实践总体上无效;需要采取干预措施提高治疗依从性。对高风险男性进行有针对性的 DXA 检测与较低的骨折风险相关。

相似文献

1
Limited Osteoporosis Screening Effectiveness Due to Low Treatment Rates in a National Sample of Older Men.全国老年男性样本中由于治疗率低导致骨质疏松症筛查效果有限。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Dec;93(12):1749-1759. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.06.024.
2
Association of Bone Mineral Density Testing With Risk of Major Osteoporotic Fractures Among Older Men Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy to Treat Localized or Regional Prostate Cancer.接受雄激素剥夺疗法治疗局限性或区域性前列腺癌的老年男性中,骨密度检测与主要骨质疏松性骨折风险的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e225432. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5432.
3
Bone health in women with premature ovarian insufficiency/early menopause: a 23-year longitudinal analysis.早发性卵巢功能不全/早绝经女性的骨骼健康:23 年的纵向分析。
Hum Reprod. 2024 May 2;39(5):1013-1022. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae037.
4
Adherence and efficacy of screening for low bone mineral density among ulcerative colitis patients treated with corticosteroids.接受皮质类固醇治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者中低骨矿物质密度筛查的依从性和疗效。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;109(4):572-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.486. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
5
Utility of DXA screening for diagnosis of osteoporosis in US veterans aged 70 years and older.双能X线吸收法(DXA)筛查在美国70岁及以上退伍军人骨质疏松症诊断中的应用
J Investig Med. 2018 Feb;66(2):298-303. doi: 10.1136/jim-2017-000557. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
6
Screening for osteoporosis in men: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians guideline.男性骨质疏松症筛查:美国医师学会指南的系统评价
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 6;148(9):685-701. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-9-200805060-00009.
7
Association of Bisphosphonate Therapy With Incident of Lower Extremity Fractures in Persons With Spinal Cord Injuries or Disorders.双膦酸盐治疗与脊髓损伤或疾病患者下肢骨折事件的关联。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr;101(4):633-641. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.12.010. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
8
Predicting osteoporosis medication receipt in Veterans with a spinal cord injury: A retrospective cohort study.预测脊髓损伤退伍军人的骨质疏松症药物使用情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Nov;42(6):760-767. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1584259. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
9
A comparison of electronic and manual fracture risk assessment tools in screening elderly male US veterans at risk for osteoporosis.电子和手动骨折风险评估工具在筛查美国老年男性退伍军人骨质疏松风险中的比较。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Nov;28(11):3107-3111. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4172-3. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
10
Risk of Osteoporosis and Fractures in Patients with Thyroid Cancer: A Case-Control Study in U.S. Veterans.甲状腺癌患者的骨质疏松症和骨折风险:美国退伍军人的病例对照研究。
Oncologist. 2019 Sep;24(9):1166-1173. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0234. Epub 2019 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Remote Bone Health Service for Osteoporosis Screening in High-Risk Men: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.针对高危男性骨质疏松症筛查的远程骨骼健康服务:一项整群随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.4150.
2
Osteoporosis in Older Men: Informing Patient Management and Improving Health-Related Outcomes.老年男性骨质疏松症:为患者管理提供信息并改善健康相关结局
Drugs Aging. 2025 Jan;42(1):21-38. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01163-4. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
3
Rationale for osteoporosis screening in men.男性骨质疏松症筛查的基本原理。
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Feb;36(2):163-166. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07337-5. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
4
Trends in hip fracture rates in US male veterans.美国男性退伍军人髋部骨折发生率的趋势。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Dec;35(12):2137-2144. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07236-9. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
5
Validation of Biomechanical Computed Tomography for Fracture Risk Classification in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer.生物力学计算机断层扫描在转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌骨折风险分类中的验证
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Aug;7(4):794-803. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.016. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
6
Engagement in Primary Prevention Program among Rural Veterans With Osteoporosis Risk.骨质疏松症风险农村退伍军人参与初级预防项目情况
JBMR Plus. 2022 Oct 3;6(10):e10682. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10682. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Protocol for the models of primary osteoporosis screening in men (MOPS) cluster randomized trial.男性原发性骨质疏松症筛查模型(MOPS)群组随机试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jan;112:106634. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106634. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
8
Factors Associated With Adherence to Osteoporosis Medications Among Male Veterans.男性退伍军人中与骨质疏松症药物依从性相关的因素
JBMR Plus. 2021 Jun 30;5(8):e10498. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10498. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Temporal change in the diagnosis and treatment rates of osteoporosis: results from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.骨质疏松症诊断和治疗率的时间变化:来自韩国国家健康和营养检查调查的结果。
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Sep;32(9):1777-1784. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05864-z. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
10
Factors Associated with Osteoporosis Management Among Veterans Who Received Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.接受前列腺癌雄激素剥夺治疗的退伍军人中与骨质疏松管理相关的因素
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):3270-3272. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06418-5. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial.社区筛查以减少老年女性骨折(SCOOP):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2018 Feb 24;391(10122):741-747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32640-5. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
2
Treatment of Low Bone Density or Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures in Men and Women: A Clinical Practice Guideline Update From the American College of Physicians.治疗男性和女性的低骨密度或骨质疏松症以预防骨折:美国医师学院临床实践指南更新。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jun 6;166(11):818-839. doi: 10.7326/M15-1361. Epub 2017 May 9.
3
Use and Interpretation of Propensity Scores in Aging Research: A Guide for Clinical Researchers.衰老研究中倾向得分的应用与解读:临床研究人员指南
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Oct;64(10):2065-2073. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14253. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
4
A Crisis in the Treatment of Osteoporosis.骨质疏松症治疗中的一场危机
J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Aug;31(8):1485-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2888. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
5
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in Older Men: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS).老年男性髋部骨折的危险因素:男性骨质疏松性骨折研究(MrOS)
J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Oct;31(10):1810-1819. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2836. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
6
Estimating the Time to Benefit for Preventive Drugs with the Statistical Process Control Method: An Example with Alendronate.用统计过程控制方法估算预防性药物的获益时间:以阿仑膦酸盐为例
Drugs Aging. 2016 May;33(5):347-53. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0344-7.
7
Are Men at High Risk for Osteoporosis Underscreened? A Quality Improvement Project.骨质疏松症高危男性的筛查不足吗?一项质量改进项目。
Perm J. 2016 Winter;20(1):60-4. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-190.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening Strategies for Men.男性骨质疏松症筛查策略的成本效益
J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Jun;31(6):1189-99. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2784. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
9
Geographic scope and accessibility of a centralized, electronic consult program for patients with recent fracture.针对近期骨折患者的集中式电子会诊项目的地理范围和可及性。
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):3440. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
10
Residual effect after oral bisphosphonate treatment and healthy adherer effects--the Swedish Adherence Register Analysis (SARA).口服双膦酸盐治疗后的残留效应及健康依从者效应——瑞典依从性登记分析(SARA)
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Jan;26(1):315-25. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2900-5. Epub 2014 Oct 9.