Suppr超能文献

左束支传导阻滞时的射血分数相对于心肌瘢痕量而言减少得不成比例。

Ejection fraction in left bundle branch block is disproportionately reduced in relation to amount of myocardial scar.

作者信息

Axelsson Jimmy, Wieslander Björn, Jablonowski Robert, Klem Igor, Nijveldt Robin, Schelbert Erik B, Sörensson Peder, Sigfridsson Andreas, Chaudhry Uzma, Platonov Pyotr G, Borgquist Rasmus, Engblom Henrik, Strauss David G, Arheden Håkan, Atwater Brett D, Ugander Martin

机构信息

Department of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2018 Nov-Dec;51(6):1071-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and LV myocardial scar can identify potentially reversible causes of LV dysfunction. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) alters the electrical and mechanical activation of the LV. We hypothesized that the relationship between LVEF and scar extent is different in LBBB compared to controls.

METHODS

We compared the relationship between LVEF and scar burden between patients with LBBB and scar (n = 83), and patients with chronic ischemic heart disease and scar but no electrocardiographic conduction abnormality (controls, n = 90), who had undergone cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at one of three centers. LVEF (%) was measured in CMR cine images. Scar burden was quantified by CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and expressed as % of LV mass (%LVM). Maximum possible LVEF (LVEFmax) was defined as the function describing the hypotenuse in the LVEF versus myocardial scar extent scatter plot. Dysfunction index was defined as LVEFmax derived from the control cohort minus the measured LVEF.

RESULTS

Compared to controls with scar, LBBB with scar had a lower LVEF (median [interquartile range] 27 [19-38] vs 36 [25-50] %, p < 0.001), smaller scar (4 [1-9] vs 11 [6-20] %LVM, p < 0.001), and greater dysfunction index (39 [30-52] vs 21 [12-35] % points, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among LBBB patients referred for CMR, LVEF is disproportionately reduced in relation to the amount of scar. Dyssynchrony in LBBB may thus impair compensation for loss of contractile myocardium.

摘要

引言

左心室(LV)射血分数(EF)与LV心肌瘢痕之间的关系可识别LV功能障碍潜在的可逆病因。左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)会改变LV的电激活和机械激活。我们推测,与对照组相比,LBBB患者中LVEF与瘢痕范围之间的关系有所不同。

方法

我们比较了LBBB合并瘢痕患者(n = 83)与慢性缺血性心脏病合并瘢痕但无心电图传导异常患者(对照组,n = 90)之间LVEF与瘢痕负荷的关系,这些患者均在三个中心之一接受了心血管磁共振(CMR)成像检查。通过CMR电影图像测量LVEF(%)。通过CMR延迟钆增强(LGE)对瘢痕负荷进行定量,并表示为LV质量的百分比(%LVM)。最大可能LVEF(LVEFmax)定义为描述LVEF与心肌瘢痕范围散点图中斜边的函数。功能障碍指数定义为对照组得出的LVEFmax减去测量的LVEF。

结果

与合并瘢痕的对照组相比,合并瘢痕的LBBB患者LVEF较低(中位数[四分位间距]27[19 - 38]%对36[25 - 50]%,p < 0.001),瘢痕较小(4[1 - 9]%LVM对11[6 - 20]%LVM,p < 0.001),功能障碍指数更大(39[30 - 52]个百分点对21[12 - 35]个百分点,p < 0.001)。

结论

在因CMR检查而转诊的LBBB患者中,LVEF相对于瘢痕量不成比例地降低。因此,LBBB中的不同步可能会损害对收缩性心肌损失的代偿。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验