Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭合并左束支传导阻滞患者的心脏磁共振成像特征

CMR characterization of patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.

作者信息

Tomoaia Raluca, Harrison Peter, Bevis Lydia, Wahab Ali, Thompson Patrick, Saunderson Christopher E D, Levelt Eylem, Dall'Armellina Erica, Garg Pankaj, Greenwood John P, Plein Sven, Swoboda Peter P

机构信息

Biomedical Imaging Sciences Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS2 9JT, UK.

Cardiology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024 May 17;2(1):qyae047. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae047. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

AIMS

We aimed to identify the distinctive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) features of patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) of presumed non-ischaemic aetiology. The secondary aim was to determine whether these individuals exhibit characteristics that could potentially serve as predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery as compared with patients without LBBB.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively recruited patients with HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 40%) on echocardiography who were referred for early CMR examination. Patients with an established diagnosis of coronary artery disease and known structural or congenital heart disease were excluded. LV recovery was defined as achieving ≥10% absolute improvement to ≥40% in LVEF between baseline evaluation to CMR. A total of 391 patients were recruited including 115 (29.4%) with LBBB. Compared with HF patients without LBBB, those with LBBB exhibited larger left ventricles and smaller right ventricles, but no differences were observed with respect to LVEF (35.8 ± 12 vs. 38 ± 12%, = 0.105). The overall rate of LV recovery from baseline echocardiogram to CMR (70 [42-128] days) was not significantly different between LBBB and non-LBBB patients (27.8% vs. 31.5%, = 0.47). Reduced LVEF remained an independent predictor of LV non-recovery only in patients with LBBB.

CONCLUSION

Patients presenting with HFrEF and LBBB had larger LV cavities and smaller RV cavities than those without LBBB but no difference in prevalence of scar or ischaemia. The rates of LV recovery were similar between both groups, which supports current guidelines to defer device therapy until 3-6 months of guideline-directed medical therapy, rather than early CMR and device implantation.

摘要

目的

我们旨在识别左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)及射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)且病因推测为非缺血性患者独特的心血管磁共振(CMR)特征。次要目的是确定与无LBBB患者相比,这些个体是否具有可能作为左心室射血分数(LVEF)恢复预测指标的特征。

方法与结果

我们前瞻性招募了经超声心动图检查确诊为HFrEF(LVEF≤40%)并被转诊接受早期CMR检查的患者。排除已确诊冠状动脉疾病以及已知有结构性或先天性心脏病的患者。左心室恢复定义为从基线评估到CMR时LVEF实现≥10%的绝对改善且≥40%。共招募了391例患者,其中115例(29.4%)有LBBB。与无LBBB的心力衰竭患者相比,有LBBB的患者左心室更大,右心室更小,但LVEF方面未观察到差异(35.8±12对38±12%,P = 0.105)。从基线超声心动图到CMR(70[42 - 128]天)左心室恢复的总体发生率在LBBB和非LBBB患者之间无显著差异(27.8%对31.5%,P = 0.47)。仅在LBBB患者中,LVEF降低仍然是左心室未恢复的独立预测指标。

结论

与无LBBB的患者相比,伴有HFrEF和LBBB的患者左心室腔更大,右心室腔更小,但瘢痕或缺血的患病率无差异。两组左心室恢复率相似,这支持当前指南将器械治疗推迟至指南指导的药物治疗3 - 6个月后,而非早期进行CMR和器械植入。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d57/11195765/76ca66ebe9ef/qyae047_ci.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验