Suppr超能文献

乳腺病变的细胞学评分及与组织病理学结果的比较。

Cytological Scoring of Breast Lesions and Comparison with Histopathological Findings.

作者信息

Abraham Betty, Sarojini T R

机构信息

Department of Cytology and Radiology, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Tiruvalla, Kerala, India.

出版信息

J Cytol. 2018 Oct-Dec;35(4):217-222. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_84_17.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Cytological assessment using various morphological parameters helps segregate breast lesions in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) into different categories. The prognosis and the line of management of each category differ accordingly.

AIMS

This study aims at assessing the validity of Modified Masood's Scoring Index (MMSI) by the evaluation of cytomorphological features of various breast lesions compared with histopathological findings.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study done in 65 female patients with palpable or nonpalpable breast lesions, undergoing FNAC and biopsy over a period of 18 months from December 1, 2012, to May 31, 2014.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MMSI categorizes breast lesions, based on six cytological parameters into different categories such as nonproliferative breast disease (NPBD), proliferative breast disease (PBD) without atypia, PBD with atypia, and malignancy. The findings are compared with gold standard histopathological diagnosis.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Percentage of agreement, Kappa statistics, and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Of the total 65 cases, all cases in MMSI category I and IV showed good histopathological correlation. The agreement between MMSI and histopathology was 93.8% which is more when compared with 72.3% agreement between cytology without scoring and histopathology. MMSI has increased the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC to 93.8% from 80%.

CONCLUSION

The scoring system is easily reproducible, simple, and reliable. MMSI proved good histopathological correlation in category I and IV. This scoring technique has clearly demarcated those cases requiring surgical management. It is applicable for palpable and nonpalpable cases.

摘要

背景

在细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)中,利用各种形态学参数进行细胞学评估有助于将乳腺病变分为不同类别。相应地,每类病变的预后和处理方法也有所不同。

目的

本研究旨在通过评估各种乳腺病变的细胞形态学特征,并与组织病理学结果进行比较,来评估改良马苏德评分指数(MMSI)的有效性。

设置与设计

这是一项横断面研究,对65例有可触及或不可触及乳腺病变的女性患者进行了研究,这些患者在2012年12月1日至2014年5月31日的18个月期间接受了FNAC和活检。

材料与方法

MMSI根据六个细胞学参数将乳腺病变分为不同类别,如非增殖性乳腺疾病(NPBD)、无异型增生的增殖性乳腺疾病(PBD)、有异型增生的PBD和恶性肿瘤。将结果与金标准组织病理学诊断进行比较。

所用统计分析方法

一致性百分比、卡方统计和卡方检验。

结果

在总共65例病例中,MMSI I类和IV类中的所有病例均显示出良好的组织病理学相关性。MMSI与组织病理学之间的一致性为93.8%,与未评分细胞学和组织病理学之间72.3%的一致性相比更高。MMSI已将FNAC的诊断准确性从80%提高到93.8%。

结论

该评分系统易于重复、简单且可靠。MMSI在I类和IV类中证明了良好的组织病理学相关性。这种评分技术清楚地划分了那些需要手术处理的病例。它适用于可触及和不可触及的病例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b5/6210810/33e50ec895d1/JCytol-35-217-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验