Suppr超能文献

达格列净联合沙格列汀与西格列汀联合二甲双胍治疗未能控制的 2 型糖尿病患者的持续 52 周疗效和安全性。

Sustained 52-week efficacy and safety of triple therapy with dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin versus dual therapy with sitagliptin added to metformin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Metabolic Institute of America, Tarzana, California.

Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):883-892. doi: 10.1111/dom.13594. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and safety of an intensification strategy of early triple combination therapy with dapagliflozin (DAPA) plus saxagliptin (SAXA) to a dual therapy strategy with sitagliptin (SITA) in patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled with metformin (MET) monotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multinational, active-controlled, parallel-group phase 3b trial randomized 461 patients, at least 18 years of age, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 8%-10.5% (64-91 mmol/mol), to either DAPA plus SAXA or SITA, added to MET, for a 26-week double-blind treatment period and an extension of a 26-week blinded treatment period.

RESULTS

Mean (± SD) baseline HbA1c was 8.8% ± 0.9% (73.0 ± 9.3 mmol/mol). DAPA plus SAXA (n = 232) provided a greater reduction from baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 26 and 52 compared with SITA (n = 229) (adjusted mean ± SE change, Week 26: -1.41 ± 0.07% vs -1.07 ± 0.07% [-15.4 ± 0.8 mmol/mol vs 11.7 ± 0.8 mmol/mol]; P = 0.0008; Week 52: -1.29 ± 0.08% vs -0.81 ± 0.09% [14.1 ± 0.9 mmol/mol vs 8.9 ± 1.0 mmol/mol]). The between-group difference in adjusted mean (95% CI) change from baseline in HbA1c increased from -0.34 (-0.54, -0.14) at Week 26 to -0.48 (-0.71, -0.25) at Week 52. DAPA plus SAXA was generally well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Early intensification to triple therapy with DAPA plus SAXA results in better, more durable glycaemic control than addition of SITA only (dual therapy) in patients with high HbA1c levels who are uncontrolled with MET monotherapy.

摘要

目的

比较强化早期三联疗法(达格列净[DAPA]加沙格列汀[SAXA])与二甲双胍(MET)单药治疗血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的二甲双胍加西他列汀[SITA](双重治疗)的疗效和安全性。

材料和方法

这项多中心、活性对照、平行组 3b 期试验将 461 名年龄至少 18 岁、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)为 8%-10.5%(64-91mmol/mol)的患者随机分为两组,分别接受 DAPA 加 SAXA 或 SITA 联合 MET 治疗,为期 26 周的双盲治疗期和 26 周的盲法治疗期。

结果

平均(±SD)基线 HbA1c 为 8.8%±0.9%(73.0±9.3mmol/mol)。与 SITA(n=229)相比,DAPA 加 SAXA(n=232)在第 26 周和第 52 周时从基线水平HbA1c 下降幅度更大(调整后的平均(±SE)变化,第 26 周:-1.41±0.07%比-1.07±0.07%[-15.4±0.8mmol/mol 比 11.7±0.8mmol/mol];P=0.0008;第 52 周:-1.29±0.08%比-0.81±0.09%[14.1±0.9mmol/mol 比 8.9±1.0mmol/mol])。两组间从基线水平 HbA1c 变化的调整平均(95%CI)差异从第 26 周的-0.34(-0.54,-0.14)增加到第 52 周的-0.48(-0.71,-0.25)。DAPA 加 SAXA 通常具有良好的耐受性,且在两种治疗组中的不良事件发生率相似。

结论

在 MET 单药治疗血糖控制不佳的高 HbA1c 水平患者中,早期强化三联疗法(DAPA 加 SAXA)可改善血糖控制,且效果优于加用 SITA(双重治疗)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/6667916/93dabfb45198/DOM-21-883-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验