Suppr超能文献

二甲双胍单药治疗的2型糖尿病患者加用抗糖尿病药物方案的疗效和安全性比较:一项网状荟萃分析

Comparative efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drug regimens added to metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Mearns Elizabeth S, Sobieraj Diana M, White C Michael, Saulsberry Whitney J, Kohn Christine G, Doleh Yunes, Zaccaro Eric, Coleman Craig I

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America; Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, United States of America.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Saint Joseph, Hartford, Connecticut, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 28;10(4):e0125879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125879. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

When first line therapy with metformin is insufficient for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the optimal adjunctive therapy is unclear. We assessed the efficacy and safety of adjunctive antidiabetic agents in patients with inadequately controlled T2D on metformin alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, regulatory websites was performed. We included randomized controlled trials of 3-12 months duration, evaluating Food and Drug Administration or European Union approved agents (noninsulin and long acting, once daily basal insulins) in patients experiencing inadequate glycemic control with metformin monotherapy (≥ 1500 mg daily or maximally tolerated dose for ≥ 4 weeks). Random-effects network meta-analyses were used to compare the weighted mean difference for changes from baseline in HbA1c, body weight (BW) and systolic blood pressure (SBP), and the risk of developing hypoglycemia, urinary (UTI) and genital tract infection (GTI).

RESULTS

Sixty-two trials evaluating 25 agents were included. All agents significantly reduced HbA1c vs. placebo; albeit not to the same extent (range, 0.43% for miglitol to 1.29% for glibenclamide). Glargine, sulfonylureas (SUs) and nateglinide were associated with increased hypoglycemia risk vs. placebo (range, 4.00-11.67). Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, miglitol and empagliflozin/linagliptin significantly reduced BW (range, 1.15-2.26 kg) whereas SUs, thiazolindinediones, glargine and alogliptin/pioglitazone caused weight gain (range, 1.19-2.44 kg). SGLT2 inhibitors, empagliflozin/linagliptin, liraglutide and sitagliptin decreased SBP (range, 1.88-5.43 mmHg). No therapy increased UTI risk vs. placebo; however, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of GTI (range, 2.16-8.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding different AHAs to metformin was associated with varying effects on HbA1c, BW, SBP, hypoglycemia, UTI and GTI which should impact clinician choice when selecting adjunctive therapy.

摘要

引言

对于2型糖尿病(T2D)患者,当一线治疗药物二甲双胍疗效不足时,最佳的辅助治疗方案尚不明确。我们评估了在仅使用二甲双胍血糖控制不佳的患者中,辅助抗糖尿病药物的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

检索了MEDLINE、CENTRAL、clinicaltrials.gov以及监管机构网站。我们纳入了为期3至12个月的随机对照试验,这些试验评估了美国食品药品监督管理局或欧盟批准的药物(非胰岛素类药物以及长效、每日一次的基础胰岛素),受试患者为仅接受二甲双胍单药治疗(每日≥1500 mg或最大耐受剂量≥4周)但血糖控制不佳的患者。采用随机效应网络荟萃分析来比较糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、体重(BW)和收缩压(SBP)自基线变化的加权平均差,以及发生低血糖、泌尿系统感染(UTI)和生殖道感染(GTI)的风险。

结果

纳入了62项评估25种药物的试验。与安慰剂相比,所有药物均显著降低了HbA1c;尽管降低程度有所不同(范围为:米格列醇降低0.43%,格列本脲降低1.29%)。与安慰剂相比,甘精胰岛素、磺脲类药物(SUs)和那格列奈增加了低血糖风险(范围为4.00 - 11.67)。钠 - 葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽 - 1类似物、米格列醇和恩格列净/利格列汀显著降低了体重(范围为1.15 - 2.26 kg),而SUs、噻唑烷二酮类药物、甘精胰岛素和阿格列汀/吡格列酮导致体重增加(范围为1.19 - 2.44 kg)。SGLT2抑制剂、恩格列净/利格列汀、利拉鲁肽和西他列汀降低了收缩压(范围为1.88 - 5.43 mmHg)。与安慰剂相比,没有哪种治疗增加了UTI风险;然而,SGLT2抑制剂与GTI风险增加相关(范围为2.16 - 8.03)。

结论

在二甲双胍基础上加用不同的抗高血糖药物(AHAs)对HbA1c、BW、SBP、低血糖、UTI和GTI有不同影响,这在选择辅助治疗时应会影响临床医生的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/059a/4412636/a4efbe4a715e/pone.0125879.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验