Bennett J M, Muss H B, Doroshow J H, Wolff S, Krementz E T, Cartwright K, Dukart G, Reisman A, Schoch I
Medical Oncology Unit, University of Rochester Cancer Center, NY 14642.
J Clin Oncol. 1988 Oct;6(10):1611-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.10.1611.
Three hundred thirty-one women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive combination chemotherapy with either cyclophosphamide, Novantrone (mitoxantrone; Lederle Laboratories, Wayne, NJ), and fluorouracil (CNF) or cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and fluorouracil (CAF). Patients could not have had prior chemotherapy, although adjuvant chemotherapy was acceptable. Initial doses were 500 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide and 500 mg/m2 of fluorouracil with either 10 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone or 50 mg/m2 of doxorubicin, administered intravenously (IV) on day 1 and repeated every 3 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in pretreatment or prior therapy characteristics between the groups. For patients assigned to the CNF and CAF groups, respectively, 25 (18%) were premenopausal, 39 (40%) were estrogen receptor (ER) negative, 39 (38%) had a disease-free interval less than 1 year, and 24 (26%) had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were compared for response rate, duration of response, time to progression or death, time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival. None of these parameters were statistically significant favoring one regimen over the other. The response rate (complete [CR] and partial response [PR]) was 29% for the CNF group (95% confidence interval of 22% to 37%) and 37% for the CAF group (95% confidence interval of 29% to 45%). The median response duration and TTF were 171 days and 125 days for the CNF group and 254 days and 147 days for the CAF group, respectively. The median survival times for the CNF group and the CAF group were 377 and 385 days, respectively. The major dose-limiting toxicity for both regimens was leukopenia, manifested as granulocytopenia. The incidence of stomatitis/mucositis was 10% in the CNF group and 19% in the CAF group. Alopecia occurred in 49% of CNF patients (severely for 4%) and in 86% of CAF patients (severely for 39%). Nausea/vomiting occurred in 80% of CNF patients and in 81% of CAF patients; the degree of severity was also comparable. There was significantly less cardiotoxicity observed in the CNF group compared with the CAF group. Although CNF is somewhat less effective in overall response rate, survival curves are identical. CNF can be offered to patients who reject anthracycline-containing regimens because of fear of alopecia.
331名转移性乳腺癌女性被随机分为两组,分别接受环磷酰胺、诺维本(米托蒽醌;美国新泽西州韦恩市莱德利实验室)和氟尿嘧啶(CNF)联合化疗,或环磷酰胺、阿霉素(多柔比星;美国俄亥俄州哥伦布市阿德里亚实验室)和氟尿嘧啶(CAF)联合化疗。患者此前未接受过化疗,但辅助化疗是可以接受的。初始剂量为环磷酰胺500mg/m²、氟尿嘧啶500mg/m²,同时联合10mg/m²米托蒽醌或50mg/m²多柔比星,于第1天静脉注射,每3周重复一次。两组患者的预处理或既往治疗特征无统计学显著差异。分别分配至CNF组和CAF组的患者中,25名(18%)为绝经前患者,39名(40%)雌激素受体(ER)阴性,39名(38%)无病间期小于1年,24名(26%)接受过辅助化疗。比较了所有患者的缓解率、缓解持续时间、疾病进展或死亡时间、治疗失败时间(TTF)和生存率。这些参数均无统计学显著差异表明一种方案优于另一种方案。CNF组的缓解率(完全缓解[CR]和部分缓解[PR])为29%(95%置信区间为22%至37%),CAF组为37%(95%置信区间为29%至45%)。CNF组的中位缓解持续时间和TTF分别为171天和125天,CAF组分别为254天和147天。CNF组和CAF组的中位生存时间分别为377天和385天。两种方案的主要剂量限制性毒性均为白细胞减少,表现为粒细胞减少。CNF组口腔炎/粘膜炎的发生率为10%,CAF组为19%。49%的CNF患者出现脱发(4%为严重脱发),86%的CAF患者出现脱发(39%为严重脱发)。80%的CNF患者和81%的CAF患者出现恶心/呕吐;严重程度也相当。与CAF组相比,CNF组观察到的心脏毒性明显较少。尽管CNF在总体缓解率方面略低,但生存曲线相同。对于因担心脱发而拒绝含蒽环类方案的患者,可以提供CNF方案。