Alonso M C, Tabernero J M, Ojeda B, Llanos M, Solà C, Climent M A, Seguí M A, López J J
Medical Oncology Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hospital de Sant Pau, Spain.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995 Apr;34(1):15-24. doi: 10.1007/BF00666487.
One hundred patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomly selected to receive combined chemotherapy treatment with adriamycin (50 mg/m2) or mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2) associated with 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 21 days with a maximum of ten cycles. All patients included in this study were under 75 years of age and had ECOG performance status of less than 4. They had not been treated previously with chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, which could not have included anthracyclines, had to have relapsed at least 12 months after the completion of therapy. There were no statistically significant differences in pretreatment characteristics or metastatic disease location between the two groups. Ninety-four patients were assessable for response. No differences were observed in response rate or in survival between the groups. The response rate (complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)) was 68% (13% CR and 55% PR for CAF; 0% CR and 68% PR for CNF). Median survival for all patients was 19 months (18 months with CAF and 19 months with CNF). All patients were assessable for toxicity. There were no differences in gastrointestinal and cardiac toxicity. More grade I-II hematologic toxicity episodes (p < 0.001) and treatment delays (p = 0.05) due to leucopenia were observed with the CNF group, and more grade III alopecia (p < 0.001) was observed with the CAF group. Patients received further therapeutic manoeuvres after finishing the study with a sequential treatment consisting of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy with mitomycin (M) -vinblastine (Vbl) (M 10 mg/m2 day 1, Vbl 5 mg/m2 days 1, 15 and 29; maximum 5 cycles). This chemotherapy treatment was received by 32 patients, with a response rate of 34% and grade III-IV hematologic toxicity of 37%. Treatment with CNF can be considered a good alternative to CAF for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. M-Vbl treatment is useful as second-line treatment in patients with prior adriamycin exposure.
一百例转移性乳腺癌患者被随机选取,接受阿霉素(50mg/m²)或米托蒽醌(12mg/m²)联合5-氟尿嘧啶(600mg/m²)及环磷酰胺(600mg/m²)的联合化疗,每21天静脉给药一次,最多进行十个周期。本研究纳入的所有患者年龄均在75岁以下,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分小于4分。他们之前未接受过针对转移性疾病的化疗。接受过辅助化疗(且辅助化疗未包含蒽环类药物)的患者,必须在治疗结束后至少12个月复发。两组患者的预处理特征或转移性疾病部位无统计学显著差异。94例患者可评估疗效。两组在缓解率或生存率方面未观察到差异。缓解率(完全缓解(CR)和部分缓解(PR))为68%(CAF方案中CR为13%,PR为55%;CNF方案中CR为0%,PR为68%)。所有患者的中位生存期为19个月(CAF方案为18个月,CNF方案为19个月)。所有患者均可评估毒性。胃肠道和心脏毒性无差异。CNF组观察到更多的I-II级血液学毒性事件(p<0.001)和因白细胞减少导致的治疗延迟(p = 0.05),CAF组观察到更多的III级脱发(p<0.001)。患者在完成研究后接受了进一步的治疗措施,采用由激素治疗和丝裂霉素(M)-长春碱(Vbl)化疗组成的序贯治疗(M 10mg/m²第1天,Vbl 5mg/m²第1、15和29天;最多5个周期)。32例患者接受了这种化疗治疗,缓解率为34%,III-IV级血液学毒性为37%。对于转移性乳腺癌的一线治疗,CNF方案可被视为CAF方案的良好替代方案。M-Vbl治疗对于曾接触过阿霉素的患者作为二线治疗是有用的。