Suppr超能文献

低温保存同种异体移植物在天然和人工主动脉感染管理中的应用

Cryopreserved Allograft in the Management of Native and Prosthetic Aortic Infections.

作者信息

Masabni Khalil, Weaver Mitchell R, Kandagatla Pridvi, Shepard Alexander D, Huang Jordan, Al Adas Ziad, Liang Liang, Balraj Praveen, Nypaver Timothy J, Kabbani Loay S

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Edith and Benson Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, MI.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Edith and Benson Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, MI.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Apr;56:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with aortic native and prosthetic infections is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We describe a single-center experience with the use of cryopreserved allografts for the treatment of aortic infections, and compare outcomes with rifampin-soaked grafts and extra-anatomic bypass.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent an operative intervention for aortic infection at our tertiary care center from August 2007 to August 2017. Demographic data, preoperative work-up, procedural details, and outcomes were collected for each treatment modality.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients had aortic revascularization for aortic infection. Seventeen patients had cryopreserved allografts, 10 had rifampin-soaked grafts, and 5 had extra-anatomic bypass. Sixteen patients (50%) had native aortic infection and 16 patients (50%) had prosthetic aortic infection. Eighteen had involvement of the infrarenal abdominal aorta, 12 of the paravisceral aorta, and 2 of the descending thoracic aorta. Early mortality was 5.9% (1/17) for the cryopreserved group, 10% (1/10) for the rifampin-soaked group, and 40% (2/5) for the extra-anatomic bypass group. Early graft-related complications occurred in 1 patient (cryopreserved group). Mean follow-up was 34.8 months. Late death occurred in 4 patients with cryopreserved allografts, 2 with rifampin-soaked grafts and none with extra-anatomic bypass. Late graft-related complications occurred in 4 patients (cryopreserved group). Only 1 patient had recurrence of aortic infection (cryopreserved group) and 2 patients had limb loss (1 from the cryopreserved group and 1 from the rifampin-soaked group). At 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years, estimated survival for patients with cryopreserved allografts was 94%, 82%, 75%, and 64%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of aortic infections is challenging. In patients who do not need immediate intervention, in situ aortic reconstruction with cryopreserved allografts is a viable treatment modality with relatively low morbidity and mortality.

摘要

背景

主动脉原发性和人工血管感染患者的治疗与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。我们描述了在单中心使用冷冻保存同种异体移植物治疗主动脉感染的经验,并将结果与利福平浸泡移植物和解剖外旁路手术进行比较。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2007年8月至2017年8月在我们三级医疗中心接受主动脉感染手术干预的所有患者。收集每种治疗方式的人口统计学数据、术前检查、手术细节和结果。

结果

32例患者因主动脉感染接受了主动脉血管重建术。17例患者使用冷冻保存同种异体移植物,10例使用利福平浸泡移植物,5例进行解剖外旁路手术。16例患者(50%)为原发性主动脉感染,16例患者(50%)为人工血管主动脉感染。18例累及肾下腹主动脉,12例累及内脏旁主动脉,2例累及胸降主动脉。冷冻保存组早期死亡率为5.9%(1/17),利福平浸泡组为10%(1/10),解剖外旁路组为40%(2/5)。冷冻保存组有1例患者发生早期移植物相关并发症。平均随访34.8个月。冷冻保存同种异体移植物组有4例患者发生晚期死亡,利福平浸泡移植物组有2例,解剖外旁路组无晚期死亡。冷冻保存组有4例患者发生晚期移植物相关并发症。仅1例患者(冷冻保存组)发生主动脉感染复发,2例患者发生肢体缺失(1例来自冷冻保存组,1例来自利福平浸泡组)。在1个月、6个月、1年和3年时,冷冻保存同种异体移植物患者的估计生存率分别为94%、82%、75%和64%。

结论

主动脉感染的治疗具有挑战性。对于不需要立即干预的患者,使用冷冻保存同种异体移植物进行原位主动脉重建是一种可行的治疗方式,发病率和死亡率相对较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验