School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Department of Construction Management, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 29;15(12):2696. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122696.
Previous research has recognized the importance of eliminating safety violations in the context of a social group. However, the social contagion effect of safety violations within a construction crew has not been sufficiently understood. To address this deficiency, this research aims to develop a hybrid simulation approach to look into the cognitive, social, and organizational aspects that can determine the social contagion effect of safety violations within a construction crew. The hybrid approach integrates System Dynamics (SD) and Agent-based Modeling (ABM) to better represent the real world. Our findings show that different interventions should be employed for different work environments. Specifically, social interactions play a critical role at the modest hazard levels because workers in this situation may encounter more ambiguity or uncertainty. Interventions related to decreasing the contagion probability and the safety⁻productivity tradeoff should be given priority. For the low hazard situation, highly intensive management strategies are required before the occurrence of injuries or accidents. In contrast, for the high hazard situation, highly intensive proactive safety strategies should be supplemented by other interventions (e.g., a high safety goal) to further control safety violations. Therefore, this research provides a practical framework to examine how specific accident prevention measures, which interact with workers or environmental characteristics (i.e., the hazard level), can influence the social contagion effect of safety violations.
先前的研究已经认识到在社会群体背景下消除安全违规行为的重要性。然而,建筑工地上安全违规行为的社会传染效应尚未得到充分理解。为了解决这一不足,本研究旨在开发一种混合模拟方法,研究可以决定建筑工地上安全违规行为的社会传染效应的认知、社会和组织方面。混合方法将系统动力学(SD)和基于代理的建模(ABM)结合起来,以更好地反映现实世界。我们的研究结果表明,不同的干预措施应适用于不同的工作环境。具体而言,社会互动在中等危险水平下起着关键作用,因为在这种情况下的工人可能会遇到更多的模糊性或不确定性。应优先考虑与降低传染概率和安全-生产力权衡相关的干预措施。对于低危险情况,在发生伤害或事故之前需要采取高强度的管理策略。相比之下,对于高危险情况,高强度的主动安全策略应辅以其他干预措施(例如,高安全目标),以进一步控制安全违规行为。因此,本研究提供了一个实用的框架,用于研究特定的事故预防措施如何与工人或环境特征(即危险水平)相互作用,从而影响安全违规行为的社会传染效应。