School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Department of Construction Management, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 17;15(4):773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040773.
This research developed and tested a model of the social contagion effect of coworkers’ safety violations on individual workers within construction crews. Both situational and routine safety violations were considered in this model. Empirical data were collected from 345 construction workers in China using a detailed questionnaire. The results showed that both types of safety violations made by coworkers were significantly related to individuals’ perceived social support and production pressure. Individuals’ attitudinal ambivalence toward safety compliance mediated the relationships between perceived social support and production pressure and both types of individuals’ safety violations. However, safety motivation only mediated the effects of perceived social support and production pressure on individuals’ situational safety violations. Further, this research supported the differences between situational and routine safety violations. Specifically, we found that individuals were more likely to imitate coworkers’ routine safety violations than their situational safety violations. Coworkers’ situational safety violations had an indirect effect on individuals’ situational safety violations mainly through perceived social support and safety motivation. By contrast, coworkers’ routine safety violations had an indirect effect on individuals’ routine safety violations mainly through perceived production pressure and attitudinal ambivalence. Finally, the theoretical and practical implications, research limitations, and future directions were discussed.
本研究开发并检验了一个模型,用于描述建筑工人团队中同事的安全违规行为对个体工人的社会传染效应。该模型考虑了情境性违规和习惯性违规。通过详细的问卷,从中国的 345 名建筑工人那里收集了实证数据。结果表明,同事的两种类型的安全违规行为都与个体感知到的社会支持和生产压力显著相关。个体对安全合规的态度矛盾在感知到的社会支持和生产压力与个体的两种安全违规行为之间起到了中介作用。然而,安全动机仅在感知到的社会支持和生产压力对个体的情境性安全违规行为的影响中起到了中介作用。此外,本研究支持了情境性违规和习惯性违规之间的差异。具体而言,我们发现个体更有可能模仿同事的习惯性安全违规行为,而不是情境性安全违规行为。同事的情境性安全违规行为主要通过感知到的社会支持和安全动机对个体的情境性安全违规行为产生间接影响。相比之下,同事的习惯性安全违规行为主要通过感知到的生产压力和态度矛盾对个体的习惯性安全违规行为产生间接影响。最后,讨论了理论和实践意义、研究限制以及未来的研究方向。