• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging-magnetic resonance in differentiating functional from non-functional pituitary macro-adenoma and classification of tumor consistency.磁共振扩散加权成像在鉴别功能性与非功能性垂体大腺瘤及肿瘤质地分类中的准确性。
Neuroradiol J. 2019 Apr;32(2):74-85. doi: 10.1177/1971400918809825. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
2
Pituitary macroadenoma: Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient magnetic resonance imaging in grading tumor aggressiveness.垂体大腺瘤:表观扩散系数磁共振成像在评估肿瘤侵袭性分级中的准确性
Neuroradiol J. 2019 Apr;32(2):86-91. doi: 10.1177/1971400919825696. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
3
Analysis of 7-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the prediction of pituitary macroadenoma consistency.7 特斯拉弥散加权成像分析在预测垂体大腺瘤质地中的应用。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Feb 28;134(3):771-779. doi: 10.3171/2019.12.JNS192940. Print 2021 Mar 1.
4
Prediction of the consistency of pituitary adenoma: A comparative study on diffusion-weighted imaging and pathological results.垂体腺瘤一致性的预测:弥散加权成像与病理结果的对比研究
J Neuroradiol. 2016 Jun;43(3):186-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
5
ADC histogram analysis for adrenal tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating adrenal adenoma from pheochromocytoma.肾上腺肿瘤的表观扩散系数(ADC)直方图分析:用于鉴别肾上腺腺瘤与嗜铬细胞瘤的表观扩散系数直方图分析
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Apr;45(4):1195-1203. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25452. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
6
Role of PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the evaluation of pituitary adenomas.垂体腺瘤 PROPELLER 扩散加权成像和表观扩散系数的作用评估。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.05.023. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
7
Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.脑胶质瘤:标准或高 b 值扩散加权磁共振成像表观扩散系数图的直方图分析——与肿瘤分级的相关性。
Radiology. 2011 Dec;261(3):882-90. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110686. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
8
Differentiating skull base chordomas and invasive pituitary adenomas with conventional MRI.运用传统磁共振成像鉴别颅底脊索瘤和侵袭性垂体腺瘤。
Acta Radiol. 2018 Nov;59(11):1358-1364. doi: 10.1177/0284185118757576. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
9
Differentiating glioblastoma multiforme from cerebral lymphoma: application of advanced texture analysis of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients.鉴别多形性胶质母细胞瘤与脑淋巴瘤:定量表观扩散系数的高级纹理分析的应用。
Neuroradiol J. 2020 Oct;33(5):428-436. doi: 10.1177/1971400920937382. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Diagnostic value of early postoperative MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging following trans-sphenoidal resection of non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas.经蝶窦切除无功能垂体大腺瘤术后早期MRI及弥散加权成像的诊断价值
Clin Radiol. 2018 Jun;73(6):535-541. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning Prediction of Pituitary Macroadenoma Consistency: Utilizing Demographic Data and Brain MRI Parameters.垂体大腺瘤质地的机器学习预测:利用人口统计学数据和脑部MRI参数
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Feb 7. doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01417-6.
2
The current state of MRI-based radiomics in pituitary adenoma: promising but challenging.基于 MRI 的脑垂体瘤放射组学的现状:前景广阔但极具挑战。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 20;15:1426781. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1426781. eCollection 2024.
3
Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of pituitary region tumors.弥散加权成像在垂体区肿瘤诊断中的作用。
Neuroradiology. 2025 Feb;67(2):437-447. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03467-z. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
4
Diffusion-weighted imaging does not seem to be a predictor of consistency in pituitary adenomas.弥散加权成像似乎不能预测垂体腺瘤的一致性。
Pituitary. 2024 Apr;27(2):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s11102-023-01377-6. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
5
The Party Wall: Redefining the Indications of Transcranial Approaches for Giant Pituitary Adenomas in Endoscopic Era.《共用墙:重新定义内镜时代经颅入路治疗巨大垂体腺瘤的适应症》
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 10;15(8):2235. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082235.
6
Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: Diagnosis, Post-Treatment Changes, and Advanced Sequences-An Updated Review.神经肿瘤学中的扩散加权成像:诊断、治疗后变化及高级序列——最新综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 19;15(3):618. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030618.
7
Image-driven classification of functioning and nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma by deep convolutional neural networks.基于深度卷积神经网络的功能性和无功能性垂体腺瘤的图像驱动分类
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021 May 14;19:3077-3086. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.023. eCollection 2021.
8
Prediction of pituitary adenoma surgical consistency: radiomic data mining and machine learning on T2-weighted MRI.基于 T2 加权 MRI 的影像组学数据挖掘和机器学习预测垂体腺瘤手术一致性
Neuroradiology. 2020 Dec;62(12):1649-1656. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02502-z. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
9
Differentiating glioblastoma multiforme from cerebral lymphoma: application of advanced texture analysis of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients.鉴别多形性胶质母细胞瘤与脑淋巴瘤:定量表观扩散系数的高级纹理分析的应用。
Neuroradiol J. 2020 Oct;33(5):428-436. doi: 10.1177/1971400920937382. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Prediction of high proliferative index in pituitary macroadenomas using MRI-based radiomics and machine learning.基于 MRI 的放射组学和机器学习预测垂体大腺瘤的高增殖指数。
Neuroradiology. 2019 Dec;61(12):1365-1373. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02266-1. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Routine and Advanced Diffusion Imaging Modules of the Salivary Glands.唾液腺的常规与高级扩散成像模块
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2018 May;28(2):245-254. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2018.01.010.
2
Differentiation of residual/recurrent gliomas from postradiation necrosis with arterial spin labeling and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging-derived metrics.利用动脉自旋标记和扩散张量磁共振成像衍生指标鉴别残留/复发性胶质瘤与放射性坏死。
Neuroradiology. 2018 Feb;60(2):169-177. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1955-3. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
3
ADC-derived spatial features can accurately classify adnexal lesions.ADC 衍生的空间特征可准确分类附件病变。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Apr;47(4):1061-1071. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25854. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
4
Improved visual acuity after microsurgical clipping of a symptomatic anterior cerebral artery aneurysm: case report.症状性大脑前动脉动脉瘤显微手术夹闭术后视力改善:病例报告
Br J Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;33(3):278-280. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2017.1332337. Epub 2017 May 31.
5
Concomitant Primary CNS Lymphoma and FSH-Pituitary Adenoma Arising Within the Sella. Entirely Coincidental?鞍区内同时发生原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤和促卵泡激素垂体腺瘤。纯属巧合?
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):E170-E175. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw003.
6
Computer aided diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Infarction and carotid atherosclerosis using ultrasound images: A review.利用超声图像对冠状动脉疾病、心肌梗死和颈动脉粥样硬化进行计算机辅助诊断:综述
Phys Med. 2017 Jan;33:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
7
Apparent diffusion coefficient and pituitary macroadenomas: pre-operative assessment of tumor atypia.表观扩散系数与垂体大腺瘤:肿瘤异型性的术前评估
Pituitary. 2017 Apr;20(2):195-200. doi: 10.1007/s11102-016-0759-5.
8
Predictive role of dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MR sequences in pre-surgical evaluation of macroadenomas consistency.动态对比增强T1加权磁共振序列在垂体大腺瘤质地术前评估中的预测作用。
Pituitary. 2017 Apr;20(2):201-209. doi: 10.1007/s11102-016-0760-z.
9
Oriented collagen fibers direct tumor cell intravasation.定向排列的胶原纤维引导肿瘤细胞进入血管。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 4;113(40):11208-11213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610347113. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
10
Evaluation of Aggressive Behavior and Invasive Features of Pituitary Adenomas Using Radiological, Surgical, Clinical and Histopathological Markers.使用放射学、手术、临床和组织病理学标志物评估垂体腺瘤的侵袭性行为和侵袭特征
Turk Neurosurg. 2016;26(5):671-7. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.13161-14.2.

磁共振扩散加权成像在鉴别功能性与非功能性垂体大腺瘤及肿瘤质地分类中的准确性。

Accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging-magnetic resonance in differentiating functional from non-functional pituitary macro-adenoma and classification of tumor consistency.

作者信息

Sanei Taheri Morteza, Kimia Farnaz, Mehrnahad Mersad, Saligheh Rad Hamidreza, Haghighatkhah Hamidreza, Moradi Afshin, Kazerooni Anahita Fathi, Alviri Mohammadreza, Absalan Abdorrahim

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

2 Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group (QMISG), Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

出版信息

Neuroradiol J. 2019 Apr;32(2):74-85. doi: 10.1177/1971400918809825. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1177/1971400918809825
PMID:30501465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6410455/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of selected first or second-order histogram features in differentiation of functional types of pituitary macro-adenomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Diffusion-weighted imaging magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 32 patients (age mean±standard deviation = 43.09 ± 11.02 years; min = 22 and max = 65 years) with pituitary macro-adenoma (10 with functional and 22 with non-functional tumors). Histograms of apparent diffusion coefficient were generated from regions of interest and selected first or second-order histogram features were extracted. Collagen contents of the surgically resected tumors were examined histochemically using Masson trichromatic staining and graded as containing <1%, 1-3%, and >3% of collagen.

RESULTS

Among selected first or second-order histogram features, uniformity ( p = 0.02), 75th percentile ( p = 0.03), and tumor smoothness ( p = 0.02) were significantly different between functional and non-functional tumors. Tumor smoothness > 5.7 × 10 (area under the curve = 0.75; 0.56-0.89) had 70% (95% confidence interval = 34.8-93.3%) sensitivity and 33.33% (95% confidence interval = 14.6-57.0%) specificity for diagnosis of functional tumors. Uniformity ≤179.271 had a sensitivity of 60% (95% confidence interval = 26.2-87.8%) and specificity of 90.48% (95% confidence interval = 69.6-98.8%) with area under the curve = 0.76; 0.57-0.89. The 75th percentile >0.7 had a sensitivity of 80% (95% confidence interval = 44.4-97.5%) and specificity of 66.67% (95% confidence interval = 43.0-85.4%) for categorizing tumors to functional and non-functional types (area under the curve = 0.74; 0.55-0.88). Using these cut-offs, smoothness and uniformity are suggested as negative predictive indices (non-functional tumors) whereas 75th percentile is more applicable for diagnosis of functional tumors.

CONCLUSION

First or second-order histogram features could be helpful in differentiating functional vs non-functional pituitary macro-adenoma tumors.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定所选的一阶或二阶直方图特征在鉴别垂体大腺瘤功能类型方面的准确性。

材料与方法

对32例垂体大腺瘤患者(年龄均值±标准差 = 43.09 ± 11.02岁;最小22岁,最大65岁)进行了扩散加权成像磁共振成像检查,其中10例为功能性肿瘤,22例为无功能性肿瘤。从感兴趣区域生成表观扩散系数直方图,并提取所选的一阶或二阶直方图特征。对手术切除肿瘤的胶原含量采用Masson三色染色进行组织化学检查,并分级为胶原含量<1%、1 - 3%和>3%。

结果

在所选的一阶或二阶直方图特征中,功能性和无功能性肿瘤之间的均匀性(p = 0.02)、第75百分位数(p = 0.03)和肿瘤平滑度(p = 0.02)存在显著差异。肿瘤平滑度>5.7×10(曲线下面积 = 0.75;0.56 - 0.89)对功能性肿瘤诊断的敏感性为70%(95%置信区间 = 34.8 - 93.3%),特异性为33.33%(95%置信区间 = 14.6 - 57.0%)。均匀性≤179.271时,敏感性为60%(95%置信区间 = 26.2 - 87.8%),特异性为90.48%(95%置信区间 = 69.6 - 98.8%),曲线下面积 = 0.76;0.57 - 0.89。第75百分位数>0.7时,对肿瘤分为功能性和无功能性类型的敏感性为80%(95%置信区间 = 44.4 - 97.5%),特异性为66.67%(95%置信区间 = 43.0 - 85.4%)(曲线下面积 = 0.74;0.55 - 0.88)。使用这些临界值,平滑度和均匀性被建议作为阴性预测指标(无功能性肿瘤),而第75百分位数更适用于功能性肿瘤的诊断。

结论

一阶或二阶直方图特征有助于鉴别功能性与无功能性垂体大腺瘤。