Suppr超能文献

引导式反思对糖尿病自我护理的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of Guided Reflection on Diabetes Self-Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Rhode Island College, Providence, Rhode Island.

Department of Adult Nursing, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2019 Feb;45(1):66-79. doi: 10.1177/0145721718816632. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of guided reflection on self-care behaviors, confidence scores, and diabetes knowledge among adults with diabetes. A randomized controlled trial with a pre/posttest design was used to generate data from a convenience sample of 62 adults with diabetes recruited from a single site. After viewing a 30-minute video on how to manage diabetes, participants were randomized to a control group (CG) (usual care) or an intervention group (IG). The IG further engaged in a reflection educational session. For 8 weeks, the IG isolated diabetes-related events weekly, critically analyzed them using Gibbs's reflective questions, and recorded their analysis in a journal. They also shared their perspective relative to using the journal in an audiotaped interview. Main measures included baseline and 8-week clinical outcomes (self-care maintenance, monitoring, management, and confidence scores and diabetes knowledge scores) and intervention acceptability. Compared to the CG, the IG had no statistically significant difference in self-care measures over time, although scores trended in the anticipated direction. Importantly, both groups had statistically significant improvement in self-care scores. Furthermore, there was statistically significant improvement in diabetes knowledge among IG participants. Informatively, IG critically analyzed 147 diabetes-related events concentrating on blood glucose, diet, exercise, monitoring, medication, sleep pattern, and health care visits. Participants found the guided reflection activity highly acceptable. Combined educational and reflection interventions are effective approaches for improving self-care outcomes and diabetes knowledge among adults with diabetes. Research concentrating on purposeful patient reflection is warranted in a larger sample paying careful attention to study limitations.

摘要

本研究旨在评估引导式反思对糖尿病患者自我护理行为、信心评分和糖尿病知识的影响。采用随机对照试验和前后测试设计,从一个单一地点招募的 62 名糖尿病患者中获得了便利样本的数据。在观看了 30 分钟关于如何管理糖尿病的视频后,参与者被随机分配到对照组(CG)(常规护理)或干预组(IG)。IG 进一步参与了反思教育课程。在 8 周的时间里,IG 每周都会隔离与糖尿病相关的事件,使用 Gibbs 的反思问题对其进行批判性分析,并在日记中记录他们的分析。他们还在录音采访中分享了他们使用日记的观点。主要测量指标包括基线和 8 周的临床结果(自我护理维持、监测、管理以及信心和糖尿病知识评分)和干预可接受性。与 CG 相比,IG 在自我护理措施方面没有随时间的显著差异,尽管分数呈预期方向发展。重要的是,两组的自我护理评分都有显著的提高。此外,IG 组的糖尿病知识也有统计学意义上的提高。有趣的是,IG 对 147 个与糖尿病相关的事件进行了批判性分析,重点关注血糖、饮食、运动、监测、药物、睡眠模式和医疗保健访问。参与者发现引导式反思活动非常可接受。综合教育和反思干预是改善糖尿病患者自我护理结果和糖尿病知识的有效方法。在更大的样本中,需要对有目的的患者反思进行研究,同时要仔细注意研究的局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验