• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Analysis of a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) single phase prostate template as a class solution.作为一种类解决方案的容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)单相前列腺模板分析。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019 Jan-Feb;24(1):92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
2
Evaluation of an automated template-based treatment planning system for radiotherapy of anal, rectal and prostate cancer.基于模板的自动化治疗计划系统在肛管癌、直肠癌和前列腺癌放射治疗中的评估
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr 12;22:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.04.001. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.容积旋转调强弧形治疗与常规调强适形放疗在食管癌中的比较:一项治疗计划的比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 7;18(37):5266-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5266.
4
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.容积旋转调强弧形治疗技术在胸段食管癌大靶区中的应用。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 May 6;14(3):4269. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i3.4269.
5
A prospective trial of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy in advanced head and neck cancer.容积调强弧形放疗与传统调强放疗治疗晚期头颈癌的前瞻性试验。
World J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 10;3(4):57-62. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v3.i4.57.
6
VMAT partial arc technique decreases dose to organs at risk in whole pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer when compared to full arc VMAT and IMRT.与全弧容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)和调强放疗(IMRT)相比,VMAT部分弧形技术可降低前列腺癌全盆腔放疗中危及器官的剂量。
Med Dosim. 2023;48(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
7
A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)与非共面调强放疗(IMRT)治疗鼻腔和鼻窦癌的剂量学比较
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Aug 30;9:193. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-193.
8
Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer.左侧早期乳腺癌的混合容积调强弧形放疗、容积调强弧形放疗和调强放射治疗的剂量学比较
Med Dosim. 2015 Autumn;40(3):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
9
Dosimetric and radiobiological characterizations of prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy: A single-institution review of ninety cases.前列腺调强放疗和容积调强弧形放疗的剂量学与放射生物学特征:单机构90例病例回顾
J Med Phys. 2016 Jul-Sep;41(3):162-8. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.189479.
10
Software-based evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning.基于软件的前列腺调强放疗计划类解决方案评估。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2017 Nov-Dec;22(6):441-449. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvement of plan quality in whole-breast radiation following BCS using feasibility DVH by less-experienced planners.经验较少的计划者使用可行性剂量体积直方图(DVH)改善保乳手术后全乳放疗的计划质量。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025 Mar;48(1):103-110. doi: 10.1007/s13246-024-01493-y. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
2
Predicting the complexity of head-and-neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using a radiation therapy planning quality assurance software.使用放射治疗计划质量保证软件预测头颈部容积调强弧形放疗计划的复杂性。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022 Dec 29;27(6):963-972. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0122. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of anatomically informed class solution template trajectories with patient-specific trajectories for stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy.解剖学指导的分类解模板轨迹与立体定向放射外科和放疗的个体化轨迹比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Nov;23(11):e13765. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13765. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
4
Systematic quantitative evaluation of Plan-IQ for intensity-modulated radiation therapy after modified radical mastectomy.改良根治性乳房切除术后调强放疗中 Plan-IQ 的系统定量评估。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 8;11(1):21879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01305-3.
5
Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.基于磁共振直线加速器的调强放射治疗(IMRT)与传统容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)前列腺癌治疗计划的剂量学比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jul 21;16(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01858-7.
6
Analysis of prostate intensity- and volumetric-modulated arc radiation therapy planning quality with PlanIQ.利用 PlanIQ 分析前列腺强度调制和容积调制弧形放射治疗计划质量。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Apr;22(4):132-142. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13233. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
7
Automated planning through robust templates and multicriterial optimization for lung VMAT SBRT of lung lesions.通过稳健模板和多准则优化实现肺部病变 VMAT SBRT 的自动计划。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jun;21(6):114-120. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12872. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
8
A fast deep learning approach for beam orientation optimization for prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.一种用于强度调制放射治疗前列腺癌的射束方向优化的快速深度学习方法。
Med Phys. 2020 Mar;47(3):880-897. doi: 10.1002/mp.13986. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy.全自动容积调强弧形治疗计划在全盆腔前列腺放射治疗中的应用。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Apr;194(4):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1246-2. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
2
Treatment plan comparison between Tri-Co-60 magnetic-resonance image-guided radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.钴-60磁共振图像引导放射治疗与容积调强弧形治疗前列腺癌的治疗计划比较
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 8;8(53):91174-91184. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20039. eCollection 2017 Oct 31.
3
Software-based evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning.基于软件的前列腺调强放疗计划类解决方案评估。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2017 Nov-Dec;22(6):441-449. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
4
Volumetric modulated arc therapy for treatment of solid tumors: current insights.容积调强弧形放疗治疗实体瘤:当前见解
Onco Targets Ther. 2017 Jul 26;10:3755-3772. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S113119. eCollection 2017.
5
Clinical implementation of a knowledge based planning tool for prostate VMAT.基于知识的前列腺容积调强弧形放疗计划工具的临床应用
Radiat Oncol. 2017 May 8;12(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0814-z.
6
Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.前列腺病例的调强质子治疗(IMPT)、容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)和4π放疗的治疗计划比较
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0761-0.
7
Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.前列腺癌患者调强放射治疗与容积调强弧形放疗的剂量学比较:一项荟萃分析
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Nov 8;17(6):254-262. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6464.
8
Prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning in seven mouse clicks: Development of a class solution for cancer.七步轻松搞定前列腺调强放疗计划:癌症分级解决方案的开发
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):567-570. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
9
Dosimetric and radiobiological characterizations of prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy: A single-institution review of ninety cases.前列腺调强放疗和容积调强弧形放疗的剂量学与放射生物学特征:单机构90例病例回顾
J Med Phys. 2016 Jul-Sep;41(3):162-8. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.189479.
10
Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer: Analysis of interfractional errors and acute toxicity.图像引导的前列腺癌调强放射治疗:分次间误差及急性毒性分析。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2016 Feb;192(2):109-17. doi: 10.1007/s00066-015-0919-y. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

作为一种类解决方案的容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)单相前列腺模板分析。

Analysis of a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) single phase prostate template as a class solution.

作者信息

Hoffmann Matthew, Pacey Jacqueline, Goodworth Josie, Laszcyzk Andrea, Ford Richard, Chick Brendon, Greenham Stuart, Westhuyzen Justin

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019 Jan-Feb;24(1):92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.rpor.2018.10.009
PMID:30505239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6251366/
Abstract

AIM

To assess a class solution template for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer using plan analysis software.

BACKGROUND

VMAT is a development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with potential advantages for the delivery of radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer. Class solutions are increasingly used for facilitating RT planning. Plan analysis software provides an objective tool for evaluating class solutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The class solution for VMAT was based on the current static field IMRT template. The plans of 77 prostate cancer patients were evaluated using a set of in-house plan quality metrics (scores) (PlanIQ™, Sun Nuclear Corporation). The metrics compared the class solution for VMAT planning with the IMRT template and the delivered clinical plan (CP). Eight metrics were associated with target coverage and ten with organs-at-risk (OAR). Individual metrics were summed and the combined scores were subjected to non-parametric analysis. The low-dose wash for both static IMRT and VMAT plans were evaluated using 40 Gy and 25 Gy isodose volumes.

RESULTS

VMAT plans were of equal or better quality than the IMRT template and CP for target coverage (combined score) and OAR combined score. The 40 Gy isodose volume was marginally higher with VMAT than IMRT (4.9%) but lower than CP (-6.6%)( = 0.0074). The 25 Gy volume was significantly lower with VMAT than both IMRT (-32.7%) and CP (-34.4%)( < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Automated VMAT planning for prostate cancer is feasible and the plans are equal to or better than the current IMRT class solution and the delivered clinical plan.

摘要

目的

使用计划分析软件评估用于前列腺癌容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)的类解决方案模板。

背景

VMAT是调强放疗(IMRT)的一种发展形式,在前列腺癌放疗(RT)中具有潜在优势。类解决方案越来越多地用于促进放疗计划制定。计划分析软件为评估类解决方案提供了一个客观工具。

材料与方法

VMAT的类解决方案基于当前的静态野IMRT模板。使用一组内部计划质量指标(分数)(PlanIQ™,太阳核公司)评估77例前列腺癌患者的计划。这些指标将VMAT计划的类解决方案与IMRT模板和已交付的临床计划(CP)进行比较。八个指标与靶区覆盖相关,十个指标与危及器官(OAR)相关。对各个指标进行求和,并对综合分数进行非参数分析。使用40 Gy和25 Gy等剂量体积评估静态IMRT和VMAT计划的低剂量冲洗情况。

结果

在靶区覆盖(综合分数)和OAR综合分数方面,VMAT计划的质量与IMRT模板和CP相当或更好。VMAT的40 Gy等剂量体积略高于IMRT(4.9%),但低于CP(-6.6%)(P = 0.0074)。VMAT的25 Gy体积显著低于IMRT(-32.7%)和CP(-34.4%)(P < 0.00001)。

结论

前列腺癌的自动化VMAT计划是可行的,并且这些计划等同于或优于当前的IMRT类解决方案和已交付的临床计划。