• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 PlanIQ 分析前列腺强度调制和容积调制弧形放射治疗计划质量。

Analysis of prostate intensity- and volumetric-modulated arc radiation therapy planning quality with PlanIQ.

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.

Toyo Medic Co.,Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Apr;22(4):132-142. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13233. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1002/acm2.13233
PMID:33768648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8035557/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of treatment planning using the PlanIQ software and to investigate whether it is possible to improve the quality of treatment planning using the "Feasibility dose-volume histogram (DVH) " implemented in the PlanIQ software.

METHODS

Using the PlanIQ software, we retrospectively analyzed the learning curve regarding the quality of the treatment plans for 148 patients of prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated radiation therapy performed at our institution over the past eight years. We also sought to examine the possibility of improving treatment planning quality by re-planning in 47 patients where the quality of the target dose and the dose limits for organs at risk (OARs) were inadequate. The re-planning treatment plans referred to the Feasibility DVH implemented in the PlanIQ software and modified the treatment planning system based on the target dose and OAR constraints.

RESULTS

Analysis of the learning curve of the treatment plans quality using PlanIQ software retrospectively showed a trend of improvement in the treatment plan quality from year to year. The improvement in the treatment plans quality was more influenced by dose reduction in the OARs than by target coverage. In all cases where re-planning was performed, the improvement in the treatment plan's quality resulted in a better treatment plan than the one adopted for delivery to patients in the clinical plan.

CONCLUSIONS

The PlanIQ provided insights into the quality of the treatment plans at our institution and identified problems and areas for improvement in the treatment plans, allowing for the development of appropriate treatment plans for specific patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用 PlanIQ 软件进行治疗计划的质量,并探讨是否可以通过在 PlanIQ 软件中实施“可行性剂量-体积直方图(DVH)”来提高治疗计划的质量。

方法

我们使用 PlanIQ 软件,对过去 8 年来在我院进行的 148 例前列腺调强放疗和容积调强放疗患者的治疗计划质量进行了回顾性学习曲线分析。我们还试图通过在 47 例靶区剂量和危及器官(OAR)剂量限制不足的患者中重新计划,来检查提高治疗计划质量的可能性。重新计划的治疗计划参考了 PlanIQ 软件中实施的可行性 DVH,并根据靶区剂量和 OAR 限制修改了治疗计划系统。

结果

使用 PlanIQ 软件对治疗计划质量的学习曲线进行回顾性分析,显示出治疗计划质量逐年提高的趋势。OAR 剂量减少对治疗计划质量的改善影响大于靶区覆盖率。在所有进行重新计划的病例中,治疗计划质量的改善导致了比临床计划中用于治疗患者的治疗计划更好的治疗计划。

结论

PANIQ 为我们机构的治疗计划质量提供了深入了解,并确定了治疗计划中的问题和改进领域,从而为特定患者制定了适当的治疗计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe0/8035557/580319176d6c/ACM2-22-132-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe0/8035557/34ee7dfc1752/ACM2-22-132-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe0/8035557/79388d8d4f71/ACM2-22-132-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe0/8035557/a374aaaaaf47/ACM2-22-132-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe0/8035557/0f74aaa5a83a/ACM2-22-132-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe0/8035557/580319176d6c/ACM2-22-132-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe0/8035557/34ee7dfc1752/ACM2-22-132-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe0/8035557/79388d8d4f71/ACM2-22-132-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe0/8035557/a374aaaaaf47/ACM2-22-132-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe0/8035557/0f74aaa5a83a/ACM2-22-132-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe0/8035557/580319176d6c/ACM2-22-132-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of prostate intensity- and volumetric-modulated arc radiation therapy planning quality with PlanIQ.利用 PlanIQ 分析前列腺强度调制和容积调制弧形放射治疗计划质量。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Apr;22(4):132-142. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13233. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Impact of treatment planning quality assurance software on volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans for prostate cancer patients.治疗计划质量保证软件对前列腺癌患者容积调强弧形治疗计划的影响。
Med Dosim. 2021;46(4):e1-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.03.013. Epub 2021 May 8.
3
Assessment of PlanIQ Feasibility DVH for head and neck treatment planning.对头颈部治疗计划进行PlanIQ可行性剂量体积直方图评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Sep;18(5):245-250. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12165. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
4
Comparative analysis of two dose-volume histogram prediction tools for treatment planning in volumetric-modulated arc therapy: A multi-planner study.两种剂量-体积直方图预测工具在容积旋转调强弧形治疗计划中的对比分析:一项多计划者研究。
Med Dosim. 2024;49(3):271-275. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2024.02.002. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
5
Knowledge-based model building for treatment planning for prostate cancer using commercial treatment planning quality assurance software tools.使用商业治疗计划质量保证软件工具进行前列腺癌治疗计划的基于知识的模型构建。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2024 Mar;17(1):337-345. doi: 10.1007/s12194-023-00759-6. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
6
Refining complex re-irradiation dosimetry through feasibility benchmarking and analysis for informed treatment planning.通过可行性基准测试和分析优化复杂再照射剂量测定法,以制定明智的治疗计划。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Dec;21(12):263-271. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13102. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
7
Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.分析影响调强放疗计划中危及器官受照剂量个体差异的因素的定量研究。
Med Phys. 2012 Nov;39(11):6868-78. doi: 10.1118/1.4757927.
8
F-Fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography/CT-guided volumetric-modulated arc therapy-based dose escalation for hypoxic subvolume in nasopharyngeal carcinomas: A feasibility study.基于F-氟米索硝唑正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描引导的容积调强弧形放疗对鼻咽癌缺氧亚体积进行剂量递增的可行性研究。
Head Neck. 2017 Dec;39(12):2519-2527. doi: 10.1002/hed.24925. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
9
A knowledge-based quantitative approach to characterize treatment plan quality: Application to prostate VMAT planning.基于知识的定量方法来描述治疗计划质量:在前列腺 VMAT 计划中的应用。
Med Phys. 2021 Jan;48(1):94-104. doi: 10.1002/mp.14564. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
10
Personalized setting of plan parameters using feasibility dose volume histogram for auto-planning in Pinnacle system.使用可行性剂量体积直方图在 Pinnacle 系统中进行自动规划时,通过个性化设置计划参数。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jul;21(7):119-127. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12897. Epub 2020 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of two dose-volume histogram prediction tools for treatment planning: Treatment planning quality and dose verification accuracy.两种用于治疗计划的剂量体积直方图预测工具的比较评估:治疗计划质量和剂量验证准确性。
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 Dec 13;33:100297. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100297. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Improvement of plan quality in whole-breast radiation following BCS using feasibility DVH by less-experienced planners.经验较少的计划者使用可行性剂量体积直方图(DVH)改善保乳手术后全乳放疗的计划质量。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025 Mar;48(1):103-110. doi: 10.1007/s13246-024-01493-y. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Personalized setting of plan parameters using feasibility dose volume histogram for auto-planning in Pinnacle system.使用可行性剂量体积直方图在 Pinnacle 系统中进行自动规划时,通过个性化设置计划参数。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jul;21(7):119-127. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12897. Epub 2020 May 4.
2
Evaluation of plan quality improvements in PlanIQ-guided Autoplanning.评估PlanIQ引导的自动计划中计划质量的改进。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019 Nov-Dec;24(6):533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
3
Comprehensive Intra-Institution stepping validation of knowledge-based models for automatic plan optimization.
Treatment Optimization in Linac-Based SBRT for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Arc versus Dual-Arc Plan Comparison.
基于直线加速器的立体定向体部放疗治疗局限性前列腺癌的治疗优化:单弧与双弧计划比较
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;16(1):13. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010013.
4
Differences between professionals in treatment planning for patients with stage III lung cancer using treatment-planning QA software.使用治疗计划质量保证软件对III期肺癌患者进行治疗计划时专业人员之间的差异。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023 Nov 16;28(5):671-680. doi: 10.5603/rpor.97511. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparing breath hold versus free breathing irradiation for left-sided breast radiotherapy by PlanIQ™.采用 PlanIQ™ 比较左侧乳腺癌放疗中屏气与自由呼吸照射。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Dec 14;18(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02386-2.
6
Knowledge-based model building for treatment planning for prostate cancer using commercial treatment planning quality assurance software tools.使用商业治疗计划质量保证软件工具进行前列腺癌治疗计划的基于知识的模型构建。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2024 Mar;17(1):337-345. doi: 10.1007/s12194-023-00759-6. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
7
Estimation of the risk of secondary cancer in rectum and bladder after radiation therapy for prostate cancer using a feasibility dose-volume histogram.利用可行性剂量体积直方图评估前列腺癌放疗后直肠和膀胱发生继发性癌症的风险。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jul 5;27:100468. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100468. eCollection 2023 Jul.
8
[Quantitative evaluation of radiotherapy plan in precise external beam radiotherapy process management for cervical cancer].[宫颈癌精确体外放疗过程管理中放疗计划的定量评估]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2023 Jun 20;43(6):1035-1040. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.06.21.
9
Multi-isocenter VMAT craniospinal irradiation using feasibility dose-volume histogram-guided auto-planning technique.使用可行性剂量体积直方图引导自动计划技术的多中心容积调强弧形放疗全脑全脊髓照射
J Radiat Res. 2023 May 4;64(3):612-21. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrad026.
10
Toward Systematic Assessment and Improvement of Radiation Therapy Plan Quality of Cooperative Group Trial Submissions: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.针对协作组试验提交的放射治疗计划质量的系统评估和改进:来自儿童肿瘤学组的报告。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jul-Aug;13(4):e374-e382. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
基于知识的模型自动计划优化的全机构内分步验证。
Phys Med. 2019 Jan;57:231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
4
Analysis of a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) single phase prostate template as a class solution.作为一种类解决方案的容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)单相前列腺模板分析。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019 Jan-Feb;24(1):92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
Clinical outcomes of hypofractionated image-guided multifocal irradiation using volumetric-modulated arc therapy for brain metastases.采用容积调强弧形放疗技术进行大分割影像引导多焦点照射治疗脑转移瘤的临床疗效
J Radiat Res. 2019 Jan 1;60(1):134-141. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rry091.
6
Reducing inter- and intra-planner variability in radiotherapy plan output with a commercial knowledge-based planning solution.利用商业化的基于知识的计划解决方案,减少放疗计划输出中的计划者间和计划内变异性。
Phys Med. 2018 Sep;53:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
7
Comparison of the progressive resolution optimizer and photon optimizer in VMAT optimization for stereotactic treatments.立体定向治疗VMAT优化中渐进式分辨率优化器与光子优化器的比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Jul;19(4):155-162. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12355. Epub 2018 May 20.
8
Knowledge-based treatment planning and its potential role in the transition between treatment planning systems.基于知识的治疗计划及其在治疗计划系统之间转换中的潜在作用。
Med Dosim. 2018;43(3):251-257. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
9
Photon optimizer (PO) vs progressive resolution optimizer (PRO): a conformality- and complexity-based comparison for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans.光子优化器(PO)与渐进式分辨率优化器(PRO):基于适形性和复杂性的调强弧形治疗计划比较
Med Dosim. 2018;43(3):267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
10
Assessment of PlanIQ Feasibility DVH for head and neck treatment planning.对头颈部治疗计划进行PlanIQ可行性剂量体积直方图评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Sep;18(5):245-250. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12165. Epub 2017 Aug 30.