Liu Zhifeng, Liu Qingyu, Wu Gongfa, Li Haigang, Wang Yue, Chen Rui, Wen Cai, Ling Qin, Yang Zhengfei, Tang Wanchun
Zengcheng District People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou 511300, China.
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018 Oct;8(9):946-956. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.10.04.
Utilize quantitative computed tomography (QCT) to detect and evaluate the severity of lung injury after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a porcine cardiac arrest (CA) model with different downtimes.
Twenty-one male domestic pigs weighing 38±3 kg were randomized into 3 groups: the sham group (n=5), the ventricular fibrillation (VF) 5 min (VF5) group (n=8), and the VF 10 min (VF10) group (n=8). VF was induced and untreated for 5 (VF5 group) or 10 (VF10 group) min before the commencement of manual CPR. Eight animals (8/8, 100%) in VF5 and 6 (6/8, 75%) in VF10 were successfully resuscitated. Chest QCT scans and arterial blood gas tests were performed at baseline and 6 h post-resuscitation. The QCT score, volume, and weight of ground-glass opacification (GGO), which was defined as poorly aerated regions with a CT value ranging from -500 Hounsfield units (HU) to -100 HU, and intense parenchymal opacification (IPO), which was defined as a non-aerated area with a CT value greater than -100 HU, were quantitatively measured.
Significantly shorter durations of CPR and fewer defibrillations were observed in the VF5 group compared with the VF10 group [duration of CPR: VF5 (6±0 minutes) versus VF10 (8.3±1.5 minutes), P<0.05; numbers of defibrillation: VF5 (1±0) versus VF10 (2.2±0.8), P<0.05]. Compared with the baseline or sham animals, declining gas exchanges (end-tidal CO, PO, oxygen index) were observed in both VF groups; however, there were no significant differences in gas exchanges between the VF groups. Compared with the VF5 group, the GGO QCT score, volume, and weight were significantly greater in the VF10 group (P=0.002, 0.001, and 0.002 respectively), while no significant differences were found in the IPO QCT score, volume, or weight between two the VF groups (P=0.354, 0.447, and 0.512 respectively).
QCT analysis enables unique non-invasive assessments of different lung injuries (IPO and GGO lesions) that can clearly distinguish heterogeneous lesions and allow for early detection and quantitative monitoring of the severity of lung injury following CPR. QCT could provide a basis for clinical early ventilation strategy management after CPR.
利用定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)检测和评估不同停搏时间的猪心脏骤停(CA)模型中成功实施心肺复苏(CPR)后肺损伤的严重程度。
将21只体重38±3 kg的雄性家猪随机分为3组:假手术组(n = 5)、心室颤动(VF)5分钟(VF5)组(n = 8)和VF 10分钟(VF10)组(n = 8)。在开始手动CPR前诱导VF并分别持续5分钟(VF5组)或10分钟(VF10组)不予处理。VF5组8只动物(8/8,100%)和VF10组6只动物(6/8,75%)成功复苏。在基线和复苏后6小时进行胸部QCT扫描和动脉血气检测。定量测量QCT评分、磨玻璃样混浊(GGO)的体积和重量,GGO定义为CT值范围在-500亨氏单位(HU)至-100 HU的通气不良区域,以及实变影(IPO),IPO定义为CT值大于-100 HU的无气区域。
与VF10组相比,VF5组观察到CPR持续时间明显缩短且除颤次数减少[CPR持续时间:VF5组(6±0分钟)对VF10组(8.3±1.5分钟),P<0.05;除颤次数:VF5组(1±0)对VF10组(2.2±0.8),P<0.05]。与基线或假手术动物相比,两个VF组均观察到气体交换(呼气末CO₂、PO₂、氧合指数)下降;然而,VF组之间的气体交换无显著差异。与VF5组相比,VF10组的GGO QCT评分、体积和重量显著更高(分别为P = 0.002、0.001和0.002),而两个VF组之间的IPO QCT评分、体积或重量无显著差异(分别为P = 0.354、0.447和0.512)。
QCT分析能够对不同的肺损伤(IPO和GGO病变)进行独特的非侵入性评估,可清晰区分异质性病变,并能早期检测和定量监测CPR后肺损伤的严重程度。QCT可为CPR后临床早期通气策略管理提供依据。