Xie Yuhong, Wang Xiaojie, Chen Zhifen, Chi Pan, Guan Guoxian, Lin Huiming, Lu Xingrong, Huang Ying, Wang Zhengqiong, Wang Mingxing, Chen Jie, Li Xiuying, Wang Min, Zheng Xuezhen, Zheng Ximei, Li Ran, Lin Qianqian
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.Email:
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 25;21(11):1255-1260.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of the bladder training in male patients before urinary catheter removal after mid-low rectal cancer surgery.
This was a prospective, open, randomized controlled study.
male patients; pathologically diagnosed as mid-low rectal adenocarcinoma; distance from tumor lower edge to anal margin ≤10 cm; standard radical surgery for rectal cancer, including intestinal resection and regional lymph node dissection.
previous history of benign prostatic hyperplasia or history of prostate surgery; bladder dysfunction such as dysuria and urinary retention before surgery; local resection of rectal tumor or extended resection. According to the above criteria, 92 patients who underwent colorectal surgery at the Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University from June to December 2016 were prospectively included. The patients were randomly divided into bladder training group (n=43) and bladder non-training group (n=49) according to the random number table method. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University (ethical approval number: 2016KY005) and registered with the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR) (registration No.ChiCTR-IOR-16007995). The implementation of patient's treatment measures, the data collection and analysis were based on the three-blind principle, using envelopes for distribution concealment. In the bladder training group, bladder training was routinely performed from the first day after operation to catheter removal, and in bladder non-training group the catheter was kept open till its removal. The catheter was removed in the early morning at the 5th day after surgery, and the spontaneous urine output was recorded and the residual urine volume of the bladder was measured after the first urination. The international prostate symptom score (IPSS) was applied to evaluate the patient's urinary function before and after surgery.
The age of whole group was (58.6±10.9) years old, the body mass index was (22.4±2.7) kg/m , and the distance from tumor lower edge to anal margin was (6.5±1.9) cm. The baseline data, such as age, body mass index, distance from tumor lower edge to anal margin, preoperative IPSS score, preoperative bladder residual urine volume, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, preventive ileostomy and surgical procedure were not significantly different between two groups (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in IPSS scores evaluated at the second day (3.6±4.0 vs. 3.5±3.4, t=0.128, P=0.899) and one month (3.7±2.9 vs. 3.0±3.1, t=1.113, P=0.269) after catheter removal between the bladder training group and bladder non-training group. No significant difference in the postoperative residual urine volume of bladder (media 44 ml vs. 24 ml, Z=-1.466, P=0.143), the first spontaneous urination volume (median 200 ml vs. 150 ml, Z=-1.228, P=0.219) after catheter removal, and postoperative hospital stay [(8.2±4.5) days vs. (9.1±5.5) days, t=-0.805, P=0.423] was found. Urinary infection rate was 20.9%(9/43) in the training group, which was even higher than 8.2%(4/49) in the non-training group, but the difference was not significant(χ²=3.077, P=0.079). No patient needed re-catheterization in either group.
The routine bladder training after mid-low rectal cancer surgery does not improve the urinary function, and can not reduce the residual urine volume of bladder after catheter removal. This routine clinical practice is not helpful for the bladder function recovery after rectal cancer surgery.
探讨中低位直肠癌术后男性患者拔除尿管前膀胱训练的有效性和安全性。
这是一项前瞻性、开放性、随机对照研究。
男性患者;经病理诊断为中低位直肠腺癌;肿瘤下缘距肛缘≤10 cm;行直肠癌标准根治手术,包括肠切除及区域淋巴结清扫。
既往有良性前列腺增生病史或前列腺手术史;术前存在排尿困难、尿潴留等膀胱功能障碍;直肠肿瘤局部切除或扩大切除。根据上述标准,前瞻性纳入2016年6月至12月在福建医科大学附属协和医院行结直肠手术的92例患者。根据随机数字表法将患者随机分为膀胱训练组(n = 43)和膀胱非训练组(n = 49)。本研究经福建医科大学附属协和医院伦理委员会批准(伦理批准号:2016KY005),并在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR)注册(注册号:ChiCTR-IOR-16007995)。患者治疗措施的实施、数据收集及分析均基于三盲原则,采用信封进行分配隐藏。膀胱训练组从术后第1天至拔除尿管常规进行膀胱训练,膀胱非训练组则保持尿管开放直至拔除。术后第5天清晨拔除尿管,记录首次排尿后的自主尿量并测量膀胱残余尿量。应用国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)评估患者术前及术后的排尿功能。
全组患者年龄为(58.6±10.9)岁,体重指数为(22.4±2.7)kg/m²,肿瘤下缘距肛缘为(6.5±1.9)cm。两组患者的年龄、体重指数、肿瘤下缘距肛缘距离、术前IPSS评分、术前膀胱残余尿量、新辅助放化疗、预防性回肠造口及手术方式等基线资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。膀胱训练组与膀胱非训练组拔除尿管后第2天(3.6±4.0 vs. 3.5±3.4,t = 0.128,P = 0.899)及1个月(3.7±2.9 vs. 3.0±3.1,t = 1.113,P = 0.269)的IPSS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义。两组患者拔除尿管后膀胱残余尿量(中位数44 ml vs. 24 ml,Z = -1.466,P = 0.143)、首次自主尿量(中位数200 ml vs. 150 ml,Z = -1.228,P = 0.219)及术后住院时间[(8.2±4.5)天 vs. (9.1±5.5)天,t = -0.805,P = 0.423]比较,差异均无统计学意义。训练组的泌尿系统感染率为20.9%(9/43),高于非训练组的8.2%(4/49),但差异无统计学意义(χ² = 3.077,P = 0.079)。两组均无患者需要再次留置尿管。
中低位直肠癌术后常规膀胱训练不能改善排尿功能,也不能减少拔除尿管后的膀胱残余尿量。这种常规临床做法对直肠癌术后膀胱功能恢复无帮助。