• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏分配的优化:移植风险评分。

Optimization of heart allocation: The transplant risk score.

机构信息

Agence de la Biomédecine, Direction Prélèvement Greffe Organes-Tissus, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France.

Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation II, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2019 May;19(5):1507-1517. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15201. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1111/ajt.15201
PMID:30506840
Abstract

The new French heart allocation system is designed to minimize waitlist mortality and extend the donor pool without a detrimental effect on posttransplant survival. This study was designed to construct a 1-year posttransplant graft-loss risk score incorporating recipient and donor characteristics. The study included all adult first single-organ recipients transplanted between 2010 and 2014 (N = 1776). This population was randomly divided in a 2:1 ratio into derivation and validation cohorts. The association of variables with 1-year graft loss was determined with a mixed Cox model with center as random effect. The predictors were used to generate a transplant-risk score (TRS). Donor-recipient matching was assessed using 2 separate recipient- and donor-risk scores. Factors associated with 1-year graft loss were recipient age >50 years, valvular cardiomyopathy and congenital heart disease, previous cardiac surgery, diabetes, mechanical ventilation, glomerular filtration rate and bilirubin, donor age >55 years, and donor sex: female. The C-index of the final model was 0.70. Correlation between observed and predicted graft loss rate was excellent for the overall cohort (r = 0.90). Hearts from high-risk donors transplanted to low-risk recipients had similar survival as those from low-risk donors. The TRS provides an accurate prediction of 1-year graft-loss risk and allows optimal donor-recipient matching.

摘要

新的法国心脏分配系统旨在最大限度地降低候补者死亡率并扩大供体库,同时不会对移植后存活率造成不利影响。本研究旨在构建一个包含受者和供者特征的移植后 1 年移植物丢失风险评分。研究纳入了 2010 年至 2014 年间所有接受首次单器官移植的成年受者(N=1776)。该人群被随机分为 2:1 的比例分为推导和验证队列。采用混合 Cox 模型,以中心为随机效应,确定变量与 1 年移植物丢失的相关性。使用移植风险评分(TRS)生成预测因子。通过使用 2 个独立的受者和供者风险评分来评估供者-受者匹配。与 1 年移植物丢失相关的因素包括受者年龄>50 岁、瓣膜性心肌病和先天性心脏病、既往心脏手术、糖尿病、机械通气、肾小球滤过率和胆红素、供者年龄>55 岁以及供者性别:女性。最终模型的 C 指数为 0.70。整个队列的观察与预测移植物丢失率之间的相关性极好(r=0.90)。高风险供体移植到低风险受者的心脏与低风险供体移植的心脏具有相似的存活率。TRS 可准确预测 1 年移植物丢失风险,并实现最佳供者-受者匹配。

相似文献

1
Optimization of heart allocation: The transplant risk score.心脏分配的优化:移植风险评分。
Am J Transplant. 2019 May;19(5):1507-1517. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15201. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
2
Prediction of Waitlist Mortality in Adult Heart Transplant Candidates: The Candidate Risk Score.成人心脏移植候选者等待名单死亡率的预测:候选者风险评分
Transplantation. 2017 Sep;101(9):2175-2182. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001724.
3
Impact of "increased-risk" donor hearts on transplant outcomes: A propensity-matched analysis.“高风险”供心对移植结局的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Feb;157(2):603-610. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.120. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
Rethinking Donor and Recipient Risk Matching in Europe and North America: Using Heart Transplant Predictors of Donor and Recipient Risk.重新思考欧洲和北美的供体和受体风险匹配:使用心脏移植预测供体和受体风险。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 May;16(5):e009994. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.009994. Epub 2023 May 16.
5
Towards a cardiac allocation score: a retrospective calculation for 73 patients from a German transplant center.迈向心脏分配评分:对一家德国移植中心的73例患者进行回顾性计算
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar 7;12(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0575-7.
6
A Bayesian methodology to improve prediction of early graft loss after liver transplantation derived from the liver match study.一种源自肝脏匹配研究的用于改善肝移植后早期移植物丢失预测的贝叶斯方法。
Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Apr;46(4):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.11.004. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
7
Donor-recipient race mismatch and graft survival after pediatric heart transplantation.小儿心脏移植术后供受者种族不匹配与移植物存活情况
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jan;87(1):204-9; discussion 209-10. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.09.074.
8
The UK DCD Risk Score: A new proposal to define futility in donation-after-circulatory-death liver transplantation.英国 DCD 风险评分:一种定义脑死亡后捐献肝脏移植中无效性的新提案。
J Hepatol. 2018 Mar;68(3):456-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.034. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Outcomes of Early Adolescent Donor Hearts in Adult Transplant Recipients.青少年供体心脏在成人体器官移植受者中的应用结局。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Dec;5(12):879-887. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Heart Transplantation: An In-Depth Survival Analysis.心脏移植:深入的生存分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jul;8(7):557-568. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Previous Conventional Cardiac Surgery on the Clinical Outcomes After Heart Transplantation.既往常规心脏手术对心脏移植后临床结局的影响。
Transpl Int. 2023 Oct 3;36:11824. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11824. eCollection 2023.
2
Frailty and solid-organ transplant candidates: a scoping review.虚弱与实体器官移植候选者:范围性回顾。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):864. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03485-7.
3
Donor heart selection: Evidence-based guidelines for providers.供心选择:供者评估的循证临床实践指南
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Jan;42(1):7-29. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.08.030. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
4
Alterations in the kallikrein-kinin system predict death after heart transplant.激肽释放酶-激肽系统的改变可预测心脏移植后的死亡。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 19;12(1):14167. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18573-2.
5
Heart Transplant Donor Selection Guidelines: Review and Recommendations.心脏移植供体选择指南:综述与建议
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Feb;24(2):119-130. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01631-y. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
6
Validation of existing risk scores for mortality prediction after a heart transplant in a Chinese population.验证现有的风险评分模型在中国人心脏移植术后死亡率预测中的准确性。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 May 2;34(5):909-918. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab380.
7
Donor-recipient risk assessment tools in heart transplant recipients: the Bad Oeynhausen experience.心脏移植受者供者风险评估工具:巴德奥因豪森经验。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;8(6):4843-4851. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13673. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
8
Outcome Predictors and Safety of Home Dobutamine Intravenous Infusion in End Stage Heart Failure Patients.终末期心力衰竭患者家庭静脉注射多巴酚丁胺的预后预测因素及安全性
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 10;10(12):2571. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122571.
9
Eudaimonia: An Aristotelian approach to transplantation.幸福论:一种亚里士多德式的器官移植观
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jun;21(6):2014-2017. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16487. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
Better Is the Enemy of Good: Ever-changing Heart Transplant Allocation.“更好”是“好”的敌人:不断变化的心脏移植分配
Transplant Direct. 2020 Dec 15;7(1):e645. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001089. eCollection 2021 Jan.