Suppr超能文献

成人衣原体性结膜炎的免疫诊断

Immunodiagnosis of adult chlamydial conjunctivitis.

作者信息

Sheppard J D, Kowalski R P, Meyer M P, Amortegui A J, Slifkin M

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Eye & Ear Hospital.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 1988 Apr;95(4):434-42. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33166-0.

Abstract

This study presents data from a prospective comparison of four currently available diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Seventy-six patients clinically suspicious for chlamydial conjunctivitis were all tested with Giemsa stain cytology, direct monoclonal fluorescent antibody (DFA) microscopy, enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) for chlamydial antigens, and standard McCoy cell culture. When compared with primary cell culture, diagnostic Giemsa inclusions had a sensitivity and specificity of 43 and 100%, respectively, supportive Giemsa cytology 71 and 67%, the enzyme immunoassay 71 and 97%, and the monoclonal fluorescent antibody 57 and 81%. Each nonculture method has distinct advantages in terms of cost, technical difficulty, speed, and accuracy, which dictate selection of the most appropriate test for office or laboratory diagnosis of chlamydial conjunctivitis.

摘要

本研究展示了对目前可用的四种沙眼衣原体感染诊断测试进行前瞻性比较的数据。76例临床上疑似衣原体性结膜炎的患者均接受了吉姆萨染色细胞学检查、直接单克隆荧光抗体(DFA)显微镜检查、衣原体抗原酶免疫测定(EIA)和标准 McCoy 细胞培养。与原代细胞培养相比,诊断性吉姆萨包涵体的敏感性和特异性分别为43%和100%,支持性吉姆萨细胞学检查为71%和67%,酶免疫测定为71%和97%,单克隆荧光抗体为57%和81%。每种非培养方法在成本、技术难度、速度和准确性方面都有不同的优势,这些优势决定了为衣原体性结膜炎的门诊或实验室诊断选择最合适的测试方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验