Sheppard J D, Kowalski R P, Meyer M P, Amortegui A J, Slifkin M
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Eye & Ear Hospital.
Ophthalmology. 1988 Apr;95(4):434-42. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33166-0.
This study presents data from a prospective comparison of four currently available diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Seventy-six patients clinically suspicious for chlamydial conjunctivitis were all tested with Giemsa stain cytology, direct monoclonal fluorescent antibody (DFA) microscopy, enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) for chlamydial antigens, and standard McCoy cell culture. When compared with primary cell culture, diagnostic Giemsa inclusions had a sensitivity and specificity of 43 and 100%, respectively, supportive Giemsa cytology 71 and 67%, the enzyme immunoassay 71 and 97%, and the monoclonal fluorescent antibody 57 and 81%. Each nonculture method has distinct advantages in terms of cost, technical difficulty, speed, and accuracy, which dictate selection of the most appropriate test for office or laboratory diagnosis of chlamydial conjunctivitis.
本研究展示了对目前可用的四种沙眼衣原体感染诊断测试进行前瞻性比较的数据。76例临床上疑似衣原体性结膜炎的患者均接受了吉姆萨染色细胞学检查、直接单克隆荧光抗体(DFA)显微镜检查、衣原体抗原酶免疫测定(EIA)和标准 McCoy 细胞培养。与原代细胞培养相比,诊断性吉姆萨包涵体的敏感性和特异性分别为43%和100%,支持性吉姆萨细胞学检查为71%和67%,酶免疫测定为71%和97%,单克隆荧光抗体为57%和81%。每种非培养方法在成本、技术难度、速度和准确性方面都有不同的优势,这些优势决定了为衣原体性结膜炎的门诊或实验室诊断选择最合适的测试方法。