Suppr超能文献

用于诊断沙眼患者衣原体感染的非培养方法:该疾病发病机制的线索?

Nonculture methods for diagnosing chlamydial infection in patients with trachoma: a clue to the pathogenesis of the disease?

作者信息

Schachter J, Moncada J, Dawson C R, Sheppard J, Courtright P, Said M E, Zaki S, Hafez S F, Lorincz A

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 1988 Dec;158(6):1347-52. doi: 10.1093/infdis/158.6.1347.

Abstract

We studied five different tests for diagnosing conjunctival Chlamydia trachomatis infection in specimens obtained from 100 children with moderate-to-severe trachoma. The tests were Giemsa stain, isolation in cell culture, direct fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibody, enzyme immunoassay, and a DNA probe. The Giemsa stain was least sensitive at 29%. The other tests gave essentially equivalent performances: sensitivity ranged from 73% to 84% and specificity from 93% to 100%. Seven of the 45 positive specimens were only positive in cell culture, whereas 11 of the 45 were negative in culture but positive in at least two nonculture tests. We speculate that these discordant results actually reflect the biologic status of the chlamydial infection. There appears to be a stage in the infection where chlamydial antigens and nucleic acids can be detected in the absence of infectivity. This stage of infection may contribute to the pathogenesis of trachoma by providing a source of sensitizing antigen.

摘要

我们对从100名中重度沙眼患儿获取的标本进行了5种不同的检测,以诊断结膜沙眼衣原体感染。这些检测方法包括吉姆萨染色、细胞培养分离、直接荧光素结合单克隆抗体、酶免疫测定和DNA探针。吉姆萨染色的敏感性最低,为29%。其他检测方法的表现基本相当:敏感性在73%至84%之间,特异性在93%至100%之间。45份阳性标本中有7份仅在细胞培养中呈阳性,而45份中有11份在培养中呈阴性,但在至少两种非培养检测中呈阳性。我们推测这些不一致的结果实际上反映了衣原体感染的生物学状态。在感染过程中似乎存在一个阶段,在此阶段衣原体抗原和核酸在无传染性的情况下仍可被检测到。感染的这个阶段可能通过提供致敏抗原源而有助于沙眼的发病机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验