Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 May;71(5):696-702. doi: 10.1002/art.40791. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
To determine if the baseline presence of autoantibodies to peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) predicts therapeutic response to biologic and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy was unsuccessful.
Baseline serum from 282 RA patients in whom MTX monotherapy was unsuccessful was screened for the presence of anti-PAD4 antibodies by immunoprecipitation. Clinical response to either triple DMARD (MTX, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine) or MTX/etanercept combination therapy was determined at 24 and 48 weeks post-treatment initiation. Disease activity was measured using the Disease Activity Score 28-joint assessment (DAS28), and erosive disease was quantified using the Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to model the clinical responses to treatment in patients with and those without baseline anti-PAD4 antibodies.
Anti-PAD4 antibody positivity was associated with male sex, a history of never smoking, and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies. At baseline, patients with anti-PAD4 antibodies had longer disease duration and significantly more radiographic joint damage than anti-PAD4-negative patients, but did not differ in disease activity according to the DAS28. In unadjusted analyses and multivariable GEE models, patients with anti-PAD4 antibodies exhibited greater improvements in DAS28 (adjusted P = 0.02 and P = 0.008, respectively) and less radiographic progression (adjusted P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively) compared to anti-PAD antibody-negative patients, independent of treatment received.
Although anti-PAD4 antibodies were associated with worse baseline radiographic joint damage, suggesting a history of active or undiagnosed disease, treatment escalation therapy was more effective in reducing disease activity and slowing the progression of joint damage in this patient subset.
确定在甲氨蝶呤(MTX)单药治疗失败的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中,抗肽基精氨酸脱亚氨酶 4(PAD4)抗体的基线存在是否预测生物制剂和传统疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)的治疗反应。
通过免疫沉淀法筛选 282 例 MTX 单药治疗失败的 RA 患者的基线血清,以检测抗 PAD4 抗体的存在。在治疗开始后 24 周和 48 周时,分别用三联 DMARD(MTX、柳氮磺胺吡啶和羟氯喹)或 MTX/依那西普联合治疗来确定临床反应。使用疾病活动评分 28 关节评估(DAS28)测量疾病活动,使用 Sharp/van der Heijde 评分方法量化侵蚀性疾病。使用广义估计方程(GEE)来模拟基线时存在或不存在抗 PAD4 抗体的患者对治疗的临床反应。
抗 PAD4 抗体阳性与男性、从不吸烟史和抗瓜氨酸蛋白抗体有关。在基线时,抗 PAD4 抗体阳性的患者疾病持续时间较长,放射影像学关节损伤明显多于抗 PAD4 抗体阴性的患者,但 DAS28 评估的疾病活动无差异。在未调整的分析和多变量 GEE 模型中,与抗 PAD4 抗体阴性的患者相比,抗 PAD4 抗体阳性的患者 DAS28(调整后的 P=0.02 和 P=0.008)改善更大,放射影像学进展更少(调整后的 P=0.01 和 P=0.002),而与所接受的治疗无关。
尽管抗 PAD4 抗体与更差的基线放射影像学关节损伤相关,提示存在活跃或未诊断的疾病,但在这一患者亚组中,治疗升级疗法更能有效降低疾病活动度并减缓关节损伤的进展。