• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正/负启动训练改变了肥胖和正常体重个体对食物的评价。

Go/no-go training changes food evaluation in both morbidly obese and normal-weight individuals.

机构信息

Behavioural Science Institute.

Nederlandse Obesitas Kliniek.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Dec;86(12):980-990. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000320.

DOI:10.1037/ccp0000320
PMID:30507224
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Not responding to appetitive food items in the go/no-go training has been shown to reduce the evaluation of these items in normal-weight university students. In this preregistered study, we administered an identical go/no-go training in both morbidly obese individuals and normal-weight university students, to assess whether findings from laboratory studies on go/no-go training performed in university environments can be translated to clinical settings.

METHOD

Obese individuals (N = 59, 14 males, M = 46.10, MBMI = 44.49) and university students (N = 58, 15 males, M = 23.21, MBMI = 22.64) were trained to consistently respond to certain food items (go) and withhold responses to other items (no-go). Evaluations of the go and no-go items, along with items not used in the training (untrained), were measured both before and after the training.

RESULTS

Before the training, evaluations of go, no-go and untrained items were matched; after the training, go items were evaluated more positively than no-go (p = .031 and p = .002 in obese and normal-weight individuals) and untrained items (p = .003 in normal-weight individuals). Only relatively hungry participants rated no-go items as less attractive than both go and untrained items (no-go devaluation effect). More important, effects of the training on food evaluation did not differ between the two participant groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese and normal-weight individuals showed similar responsivity to the go/no-go training on food evaluation, suggesting that insights from laboratory studies may be translated to clinical settings to develop effective interventions to regulate food intake. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

在go/no-go 训练中对开胃食物无反应已被证明可以降低正常体重大学生对这些食物的评价。在这项预先注册的研究中,我们对肥胖个体和正常体重大学生进行了相同的 go/no-go 训练,以评估在大学环境中进行的 go/no-go 训练的实验室研究结果是否可以转化为临床环境。

方法

肥胖个体(N=59,男性 14 人,M=46.10,MBMI=44.49)和大学生(N=58,男性 15 人,M=23.21,MBMI=22.64)接受训练以一致地对某些食物(go)做出反应,并对其他食物(no-go)做出反应。在训练前后,对 go 和 no-go 项目以及未在训练中使用的项目(未训练)进行评估。

结果

在训练之前,go、no-go 和未训练项目的评估是匹配的;训练后,go 项目的评价比 no-go(肥胖和正常体重个体中 p =.031 和 p =.002)和未训练项目(正常体重个体中 p =.003)更积极。只有相对饥饿的参与者将 no-go 项目评为不如 go 和未训练项目有吸引力(no-go 贬值效应)。更重要的是,训练对食物评价的影响在两个参与者组之间没有差异。

结论

肥胖和正常体重个体在食物评价的 go/no-go 训练中表现出相似的反应性,这表明实验室研究的见解可以转化为临床环境,以开发有效的干预措施来调节食物摄入。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2018 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Go/no-go training changes food evaluation in both morbidly obese and normal-weight individuals.正/负启动训练改变了肥胖和正常体重个体对食物的评价。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Dec;86(12):980-990. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000320.
2
Do impulsive individuals benefit more from food go/no-go training? Testing the role of inhibition capacity in the no-go devaluation effect.冲动个体是否从食物 Go/No-Go 训练中获益更多?抑制能力在 No-Go 贬抑效应中的作用检验。
Appetite. 2018 May 1;124:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
3
The role of attention in explaining the no-go devaluation effect: Effects on appetitive food items.注意在解释非-go 减值效应中的作用:对食欲性食物的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Aug;45(8):1119-1133. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000659. Epub 2019 May 30.
4
What Is Trained During Food Go/No-Go Training? A Review Focusing on Mechanisms and a Research Agenda.在食物“去/不去”训练中训练的是什么?一项聚焦机制和研究议程的综述。
Curr Addict Rep. 2017;4(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s40429-017-0131-5. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
5
When mere action versus inaction leads to robust preference change.当仅仅是行动与不作为就导致了强烈的偏好改变时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Oct;117(4):721-740. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000158. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
When not responding to food changes food value: The role of timing.当食物变化不被响应时:时机的作用。
Appetite. 2023 Aug 1;187:106583. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106583. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Explicit and Implicit Devaluation Effects of Food-Specific Response Inhibition Training.特定食物反应抑制训练的显性和隐性贬值效应
J Cogn. 2023 Jan 17;6(1):10. doi: 10.5334/joc.256. eCollection 2023.
8
How does not responding to appetitive stimuli cause devaluation: Evaluative conditioning or response inhibition?对欲求性刺激无反应是如何导致价值贬低的:评估性条件作用还是反应抑制?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Dec;145(12):1687-1701. doi: 10.1037/xge0000236. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
9
Generalization of food devaluation following food-specific go/no-go training.食物特异性 Go/No-Go 训练后食物贬值的泛化。
Eat Behav. 2024 Aug;54:101902. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101902. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
10
How can food choice best be trained? Approach-avoidance versus go/no-go training.如何最好地培养食物选择?趋近回避与趋近-回避训练。
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105226. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105226. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Tuning the value of sweet food: Blocking sweet taste receptors increases the devaluation effect in a go/no-go task.调节甜食的价值:阻断甜味受体可增强“去/不去”任务中的贬值效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb 25. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02666-w.
2
Stimulus variability improves generalization following response inhibition training.刺激变异性可提高反应抑制训练后的泛化能力。
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):786-802. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01913-w. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Response inhibition training as an intervention to modify liking and wanting for foods based on energy density: a proof of concept study.
基于能量密度的食物喜好和欲求的反应抑制训练干预:概念验证研究。
J Behav Med. 2024 Apr;47(2):271-281. doi: 10.1007/s10865-023-00453-3. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
4
Efficacy of a combined food-response inhibition and attention training for weight loss.食物反应抑制与注意力联合训练对减肥的疗效
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2022 Aug;46. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101168. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
5
Explicit and Implicit Devaluation Effects of Food-Specific Response Inhibition Training.特定食物反应抑制训练的显性和隐性贬值效应
J Cogn. 2023 Jan 17;6(1):10. doi: 10.5334/joc.256. eCollection 2023.
6
Differential Orbitofrontal Cortex Responses to Chocolate Images While Performing an Approach-Avoidance Task in the MRI Environment.在 MRI 环境中进行趋近-回避任务时,巧克力图像引起的眶额皮质差异反应。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 3;15(1):244. doi: 10.3390/nu15010244.
7
Efficacy of a food response and attention training treatment for obesity: A randomized placebo controlled trial.食物反应和注意力训练治疗肥胖的疗效:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
Behav Res Ther. 2022 Nov;158:104183. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104183. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
8
Are commonly used lab-based measures of food value and choice predictive of self-reported real-world snacking? An ecological momentary assessment study.常用的基于实验室的食物价值和选择测量方法是否可预测自我报告的真实世界中的零食摄入?一项生态瞬时评估研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Feb;28(1):237-251. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12622. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
9
Food-Specific Inhibition Training for Food Devaluation: A Meta-Analysis.食物特异性抑制训练对食物贬抑的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2022 Mar 24;14(7):1363. doi: 10.3390/nu14071363.
10
Pilot study of food-specific go/no-go training for overweight individuals: brain imaging data suggest inhibition shapes food evaluation.超重人群食物特异性 Go/No-Go 训练的初步研究:脑成像数据表明抑制作用影响食物评价
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Feb 6;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab137.