Radboud University, Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University, Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105226. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105226. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
Behavior toward appetitive stimuli can be changed by motor response training procedures in which participants approach or respond to some stimuli and avoid or inhibit behavior to other stimuli. There is discussion in the literature whether effects are different when participants approach versus avoid stimuli during approach-avoidance training compared to when they respond versus not respond to stimuli during go/no-go training. Here, we directly compared effects of approach-avoidance training and go/no-go training on food choice within the same rigorous experimental protocol. Results showed that both training procedures influence food choice such that participants preferred Approach over Avoidance food items, and Go over NoGo food items, and these training effects were not statistically different. The present work suggests any inconsistencies in the literature on possible differences in effectiveness of these training procedures may be explained by differences in methods employed. The present work also raises new theoretical and applied questions about motor response training as a means to change behavior.
行为的欲望刺激可以改变运动反应训练程序，其中参与者接近或响应某些刺激，并避免或抑制行为的其他刺激。有讨论在文献中是否效果不同时，参与者接近与避免刺激在接近回避训练相比，当他们回应与不回应的刺激在go / no - go 训练。在这里，我们直接比较影响的接近回避训练和 go / no - go 训练的食物选择在相同的严格的实验方案。结果表明，两种训练程序都影响食物选择，使参与者更喜欢接近回避食物项目，和去不去食物项目，和这些训练效果没有统计学差异。目前的工作表明，任何不一致的文献中可能的差异的有效性，这些培训程序可能是由于在不同的方法。目前的工作也提出了新的理论和应用问题关于运动反应训练作为一种改变行为的手段。
