• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗医生慢性疼痛管理实践模式评估。

Evaluation of Primary Care Physician Chronic Pain Management Practice Patterns.

机构信息

Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Sewickley, Pennsylvania.

School of Pharmacy and Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences Division of Pharmaceutical, Administrative and Social Sciences Duquesne University, Duquesne University.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2018 Nov;21(6):E593-E602.

PMID:30508990
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of chronic pain is complex and often involves the integration of multiple clinical, humanistic, and economic factors. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are often at the forefront of managing chronic pain and often initiate pharmacological pain management therapy. To date little is known surrounding the pain management practices of PCPs.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to assess the knowledge and practice of PCPs in management of chronic pain.

STUDY DESIGN

A survey.

SETTING

Western region of Pennsylvania, US.

METHODS

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey evaluated PCPs pain management treatment practices including assessment of chronic pain, procedural activities surrounding therapy, decision-making input, and knowledge for therapeutic pain management including the 5 main classes of medications. The questionnaire was developed based on a review of the literature including published chronic pain guidelines. The questionnaire was mailed to a convenience sample of 300 PCPs practicing in Western Pennsylvania. The study was approved by the University Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

The survey had a response rate of 16%. The respondents on average treated 30 chronic pain patients per month predominately in a community setting. The most common conditions treated included osteoarthritis, back and neuropathic pain. Although the major reported source of education was published literature, only 67% respondents referred to pain management guidelines. Multiple knowledge and practice gaps were identified surrounding pharmacological treatment, medication management including compliance practices, and pain assessment.

LIMITATIONS

Although low, the response rate is comparable to response rates for other chronic pain management topics including anticoagulation and prescription patterns for chronic pain physicians. Also, greater than 50% of the respondents were from private practice, therefore, the results may not pertain to other practice settings including academic and hospital-based practices.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey provided significant insight into PCP practices and highlights areas for future educational efforts. Further opioid prescribing education would be beneficial especially regarding the utilization of opioid risk assessment tools, the selection of opioids, and opioid end organ effects. Furthermore, patient education on the realities of chronic pain management and the importance of nonpharmacological treatment are needed in order to reduce the challenges faced by PCPs surrounding chronic pain management.

KEY WORDS

Chronic pain, primary care physician, pain management, survey questionnaire.

摘要

背景

慢性疼痛的管理较为复杂,通常需要综合考虑多种临床、人文和经济因素。初级保健医生(PCP)通常处于管理慢性疼痛的最前线,并且经常会启动药物治疗疼痛管理。迄今为止,人们对 PCP 管理疼痛的实践知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在评估 PCP 管理慢性疼痛的知识和实践。

研究设计

调查。

设置

美国宾夕法尼亚州西部地区。

方法

横断面问卷调查评估了 PCP 疼痛管理治疗实践,包括对慢性疼痛的评估、治疗相关的程序活动、决策投入以及治疗疼痛管理的知识,包括 5 大主要类别的药物。问卷基于文献综述和已发表的慢性疼痛指南制定。该问卷以便利抽样的方式寄给了在宾夕法尼亚州西部地区执业的 300 名 PCP。该研究得到了大学机构审查委员会的批准。

结果

调查的回复率为 16%。受访者平均每月治疗 30 名慢性疼痛患者,主要在社区环境中进行治疗。最常见的治疗疾病包括骨关节炎、背部和神经病理性疼痛。尽管主要的教育来源是已发表的文献,但只有 67%的受访者参考了疼痛管理指南。在药物治疗、药物管理(包括依从性实践)和疼痛评估方面,发现了多种知识和实践差距。

局限性

尽管回复率较低,但与其他慢性疼痛管理主题(包括抗凝和慢性疼痛医生的处方模式)的回复率相当。此外,超过 50%的受访者来自私人诊所,因此,结果可能不适用于其他实践环境,包括学术和医院实践。

结论

该调查提供了对 PCP 实践的深入了解,并突出了未来教育努力的方向。进一步的阿片类药物处方教育将是有益的,特别是在使用阿片类药物风险评估工具、选择阿片类药物和阿片类药物终末器官效应方面。此外,需要对患者进行慢性疼痛管理的现实和非药物治疗重要性的教育,以减少 PCP 在慢性疼痛管理方面面临的挑战。

关键词

慢性疼痛,初级保健医生,疼痛管理,问卷调查。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Primary Care Physician Chronic Pain Management Practice Patterns.基层医疗医生慢性疼痛管理实践模式评估。
Pain Physician. 2018 Nov;21(6):E593-E602.
2
Primary care providers' views on chronic pain management among high-risk patients in safety net settings.基层医疗服务提供者在安全网环境下对高风险患者慢性疼痛管理的看法。
Pain Med. 2012 Sep;13(9):1141-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01443.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
3
Comparison of Opioid Prescribing Patterns in the United States and Japan: Primary Care Physicians' Attitudes and Perceptions.美国和日本阿片类药物处方模式的比较:初级保健医生的态度和认知
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;30(2):248-254. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160299.
4
[Patterns of prescription of opioid analgesics in Hôtel-Dieu de France of Beyrouth].[贝鲁特法国主宫医院阿片类镇痛药的处方模式]
Encephale. 2016 Dec;42(6):511-516. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
5
Chronic noncancer pain management in primary care: family medicine physicians' risk assessment of opioid misuse.基层医疗中的慢性非癌性疼痛管理:家庭医学医生对阿片类药物滥用的风险评估
Postgrad Med. 2015 Jan;127(1):22-6. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2015.993572. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
6
Structured Management of Chronic Nonmalignant Pain with Opioids in a Rural Primary Care Office.农村基层医疗机构中阿片类药物治疗慢性非恶性疼痛的结构化管理。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;31(1):57-63. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170163.
7
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Survey of Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain in Taiwan-Comparison of Pain and Non-Pain Physicians.台湾慢性非癌性疼痛处方阿片类药物的知识、态度与实践调查——疼痛科与非疼痛科医生的比较
Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):2397-2410. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw189.
8
Beliefs and attitudes about opioid prescribing and chronic pain management: survey of primary care providers.关于阿片类药物处方和慢性疼痛管理的信念与态度:初级保健提供者调查
J Opioid Manag. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):375-82. doi: 10.5055/jom.2014.0234.
9
What are Future Pain Physicians Learning? A Survey of Opioid Prescribing Practices Among US Pain Fellowship Programs.未来的疼痛医师在学习什么?对美国疼痛专业住院医师培训项目中阿片类药物处方实践的调查。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):549-554.
10
Multimodal Local Opioid Prescribing Intervention Outcomes in Chronic Noncancer Pain Management.多模式局部阿片类药物处方干预在慢性非癌性疼痛管理中的效果。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):559-566. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180296.

引用本文的文献

1
A short-duration telementoring pain management programme for Medicaid: impact on clinician outcomes.一项针对医疗补助计划的短期远程指导疼痛管理项目:对临床医生结果的影响
Health Educ Res. 2025 May 15;40(3). doi: 10.1093/her/cyaf019.
2
Chronic pain management in primary care: Using population-based data to examine family physician practice patterns.基层医疗中的慢性疼痛管理:利用基于人群的数据考察家庭医生的实践模式。
Can Fam Physician. 2024 Sep;70(9):570-579. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7009570.
3
Meeting high-risk patient pain care needs through intensive primary care: a secondary analysis.
通过强化初级保健满足高风险患者的疼痛护理需求:二次分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):e080748. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080748.
4
Raising Awareness on the Clinical and Social Relevance of Adequate Chronic Pain Care.提高对充分慢性疼痛护理的临床和社会相关性的认识。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):551. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010551.
5
A cross-sectional survey exploring clinician perceptions of a novel Medicaid back pain policy.一项探索临床医生对新的医疗补助腰痛政策看法的横断面调查。
J Complement Integr Med. 2022 Oct 31;20(2):438-446. doi: 10.1515/jcim-2022-0213. eCollection 2023 Jun 1.
6
"It feels like an endless fight": a qualitative study exploring healthcare utilization of persons with rheumatic conditions waiting for pain clinic admission.“感觉像是一场无休止的战斗”:一项定性研究,探讨了等待疼痛诊所入院的风湿性疾病患者的医疗保健利用情况。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Sep 22;23(1):878. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05808-6.
7
Influence of Primary Care Provider Type on Chronic Pain Management Among Veterans.初级保健提供者类型对退伍军人慢性疼痛管理的影响。
J Nurs Regul. 2022 Apr;13(1):35-44. doi: 10.1016/s2155-8256(22)00032-1. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
8
Influence of provider type on chronic pain prescribing patterns A systematic review.医疗服务提供者类型对慢性疼痛处方模式的影响:一项系统评价
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2022 Mar 1;34(3):474-488. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000673.
9
Tools, Time, Training, and Team-Military Primary Care Providers' Perspectives on Improving Chronic Pain Assessment and Management.工具、时间、培训和团队——军队初级保健提供者改善慢性疼痛评估和管理的观点。
Mil Med. 2023 Mar 20;188(3-4):e731-e738. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab367.
10
Pain and Function in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain-Treating the Whole Person.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛中的疼痛与功能——治疗完整的人。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Feb 10;14:335-347. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S288401. eCollection 2021.