VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):814-822. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.035. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is hampered by side effects that may have a serious impact on quality of life, particularly stress urinary incontinence. Continence rates may be improved by surgical reconstruction of the pelvic floor.
Video illustrations of different surgical techniques may be particularly worthwhile for practicing urologists in understanding the pelvic-floor anatomy and in the training of residents and fellows in urology.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We describe and video-illustrate commonly performed pelvic reconstructive techniques in RARP, as performed by experts in the field.
Surgical techniques have been described, such as posterior musculofascial reconstruction, anterior reconstruction and periurethral suspension, preservation of membranous urethral lengthening, bladder-neck reconstruction, and combinations.
An overview of continence rates of the different techniques is given.
All reconstructive surgical techniques result in similar short-term continence rates and good-to-excellent outcomes 1yr after surgery. There are only a few randomized clinical trials comparing a reconstructive technique with "no reconstruction" or a different reconstructive technique, and outcomes are conflicting.
Although many of the procedures report a benefit with respect to early continence, benefits seem to diminish with longer follow-up. Whether any of the reconstructive techniques is superior to another is a matter of study.
Early continence rates might be improved by surgical reconstruction of the pelvic floor.
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)受到副作用的阻碍,这些副作用可能对生活质量产生严重影响,尤其是尿失禁。通过对盆底进行手术重建,控尿率可能会得到提高。
不同手术技术的视频演示对于实践泌尿科医生理解盆底解剖结构以及泌尿科住院医师和研究员的培训可能特别有价值。
设计、地点和参与者:我们描述并视频演示了 RARP 中常见的盆底重建技术,由该领域的专家进行。
已经描述了手术技术,如后肌筋膜重建、前重建和尿道周围悬吊、保留膜性尿道延长、膀胱颈重建以及组合技术。
给出了不同技术的控尿率概述。
所有重建手术技术在短期控尿率和术后 1 年的良好至优秀结果方面均具有相似的效果。只有少数随机临床试验比较了重建技术与“无重建”或另一种重建技术,结果存在冲突。
尽管许多手术程序在早期控尿方面报告有获益,但随着随访时间的延长,获益似乎会减少。任何重建技术是否优于另一种技术仍有待研究。
通过对盆底进行手术重建,可能会提高早期控尿率。